this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2025
1004 points (98.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

9868 readers
2271 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sharlot@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Chekhov’s dog: if it shows up in Act 1, it’s definitely not just going for a walk.

[–] bless@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 hours ago

If you listen carefully, there's someone speaking in Norwegian in that scene. If you translate it it says: watch the movie and information is revealed

[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I'm never watching Mulholland Drive with that bitch.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 hours ago

Or Momento.

yeah, physicists can't make good movie...

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 19 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

I didn’t find TENET confusing at all. I feel like it makes perfect sense if you actually pay attention.

[–] happyfullfridge@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 hours ago

It wasn't confusing but the logic of its mechanics weren't consistent. I think some people thought there was logic to follow, hence the confusion.

[–] chris@l.roofo.cc 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I could follow just fine. I just found it a not very good movie. It was convoluted for the sake of being convoluted.

[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

good guy save pretty girl good movie

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I said that after watching it.

The sci-fi element really didn't add anything to the story it could have just been a fun blockbuster action flick and it would have worked fine.

[–] bless@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

But then it would be any other film, not a Christopher Nolan one ;)

[–] chris@l.roofo.cc 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The movie was Christopher Nolan saying "Look how hard I can Christopher Nolan this movie. No one has ever Christopher Nolaned so hard." At least for me.

[–] bless@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago
[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 5 points 17 hours ago

Conceptually, sure. But the last big setpiece made no sense from a visual perspective. I feel like you would need to show an overhead view of the map simultaneously, to actually keep track of what was happening.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Yeah that scene where he's needlessly fighting himself made complete sense. If you see yourself coming up to you with an intent to fight a battle you've already fought, confront yourself nevertheless as it's way easier than just showing your identity.

BWAAAAHM

[–] thirstyhyena@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I have always found it weird whenever people say they don't get TENET, Inception or Interstellar on their first watch. I thought the plot were simple enough to understand.

[–] 2xar@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Right? They were pretty easy to follow. So easy that I've noticed about a dozen plotholes in them. Maybe these plotholes were confusing people, because they thought there would be a good explanation to them, that they are not getting. Nope, there aren't. They are just full of plotholes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 3 points 14 hours ago

ME: I dunno Hon, let's watch and find out.

THE HON: [Pulls out phone to look it up] Siri says it's because ...

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Everybody talking about Tenet and I'm just here wondering when the hell there was a theatrical screening of The Thing that I missed. 🫤

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 day ago (6 children)

There are types of Tenet watchers

One who doesn't know what the fuck is happening.

And the other who doesn't want to admit that they don't know what the fuck is happening.

Then there's Christopher Nolan laughing at us, because he made the movie as confusing as possible, because one upon a time, he witnessed someone committing the horrific sin of watching Interstellar on a 720p 4.5" Android Phone¹, so he decides to enact this revenge arc by making a movie in the 5th dimention that nobody but his 5d brain can understand.

¹Yes I did that 👀

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Idk, Tenet didn't seem that complex to me?

If anything, it's decent at hiding things from you at first and then providing explanations later. And if you watch again, some things suddenly make more sense now that you know about the inverted people.

At the end of the day, remember that temporal pincer movement that they explained in the part in Tallinn? Where you send people in both forwards and backwards into some point so one group has information from the other (or it's the same people going into the same time multiple times)? The whole movie is temporal pincer movements encompassed within each other so there's shorter periods of people going inverted, but also longer ones - towards the end they go several days if not weeks inverted so they can go back to when Sator's on the boat with his wife around the same time as the attack in the "Kyiv Opera House" (actually filmed in Tallinn City Hall) at the beginning of the movie.

I'm sure there's details I've missed, and for sure I don't remember the exact order of each inversion and what happened exactly when. But broad strokes, it's easy to understand and doesn't take a superior 5d brain at all. My average ADHD brain can handle it.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

It’s not complex; it’s convoluted. That’s how Nolan works. It’s a good thing that he’s a great director, because he’s a terrible writer.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It took me three viewings but I was finally able to follow the plot. I honestly loved it.

I watched the first time and was utterly confused, but I was sure there was a narrative that I just wasn't following so a couple weeks later I watched it again. This time I figured out the mechanics of the plot but I did lose the continuity. So, I watched it like 2 days later and literally took notes (like 3 sentances, not an academic study), and was able to follow the entire plotline.

Probably doesn't sound like fun to many, but for me it was an ideal movie watching experience. It provided the experience Inception promised but never lived up to (I did enjoy it as well, but it was not challenging to follow).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Damage@feddit.it 2 points 16 hours ago

sin of watching Interstellar on a 720p 4.5" Android Phone

I wached it on a plane's entertainment system, I'm not even sure it was 720p, I used the airline's headphones and there were no subtitles.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I watched Tenet while sick in bed on my phone. Some people are traveling backwards through time. there's a conspiracy. some ex soviet dickhead wants money.

it's not worth MAKING THE PANDEMIC WORSE YOU PRETENTIOUS TWAT

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MBech@feddit.dk 6 points 21 hours ago

The second time I watched Interstellar (The first time being in the cinema), I paused the movie as they launched the rocket, went and bought a surround sound system because I had a pretty good paycheck that month, and resumed the movie. Haven't regretted it a bit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When this happens to me, I think it’s a bit of a mental decision between “They’re going to explain it, it’s meant to be mysterious now.” and “They explained it poorly”.

Biggest pet peeve is when the plot centers on one key character that people only talk about, and you never see. Or when one key piece of information is muttered in a heavy accent during five other things happening.

I of course love the former. I’ve been burnt by the latter many times, like “Oh, I should’ve rewound the movie.”

[–] trublu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago

The scene in question is the opening scene of the film. It is fully explained pretty early in the second act. Definitely intended to be the "mysterious" option in this case.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 11 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

My wife is the worst about asking a question during a movie or TV show that gets answered within like 30 seconds of her asking. We call it pulling a [wife's name]

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 1 points 15 hours ago

I am familiar with the move. and from now on I'm going to call it "pulling a wife's name"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 28 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Tenet is an anti-film. You watch it and lose information as it goes on.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Tenet isn't terribly difficult to explain, though it's been too long since I've seen it for me to do it now. I remember watching it and being able to say, ok, it's not airtight, but I know what Nolan was trying to do with the movie at least. It's a very interesting idea, but while the execution has a normal amount of plot holes, they're exacerbated by a story that uses what seem like plot holes as a story device.

It hurts our brains because effect is preceding cause, and because most sci-fi stories with time travel use it in the same way as they might use a space ship: to travel to a different place that has only tangential effects on the main location (even though they may make a big noise about the Butterfly Effect, in reality it's rarely that severe) or to make nonsense shenanigans happen (things that have no basis in logic from any direction). Tenet actually did come up with a really interesting concept, and tried to give it interesting stakes, but got distracted by the shiny of "backwards bullets" and so let the logic suffer.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 124 points 1 day ago (7 children)

In that lady's defense, I'm pretty sure the opening scene of The Thing was intentionally written to make people go "what the fuck? why are they shooting at that dog?!"

[–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 8 points 20 hours ago

Yes, but that's supposed to be your inner monologue.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 209 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, and in the guy's defense, the rest of the movie is written to reveal more info.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In that lady's defense, some people seem to have their internal monologue tuned to the wrong frequency, and usually blurt it out instead.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 9 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Should switch that off at the movie tbh

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 day ago

Prosecution: ...uh, the prosecution rests, m'lud.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] apex32@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Tenet reminds me of the game Braid.

Braid is a platformer where you can reverse time on demand. At first it seems so easy. Just reverse time any time you make a mistake. But then you encounter items that don't get reversed in time. At first this seems like an annoyance, but you have to learn how to utilize this odd behavior to advance in the game. It's a clever mechanic that's difficult to fully grasp.

It turns out that having some things exempt from the normal flow of time gets really complicated.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I had a friend once who, if I'd seen a film and they hadn't, would ask me questions every few minutes throughout the movie about things it was foreshadowing but hadn't fully shown yet. If not being omniscient is that painful, run to the bathroom, read the plot summary on Wikipedia, and come back – ruin the film for yourself on your own time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›