this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2025
113 points (100.0% liked)

news

24485 readers
637 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body.

If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include not just the twitter.com URL but also Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source (archive.today, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org). Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed.

Mass-tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken Markov chain bot will result in a comm ban.

Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.

Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned.

Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 49 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The next amendment also calls for protecting the children with tamper-proof, system-wide monitoring software watching all devices' internet and file usage.

Such a software would both technically infeasible and stricter than the worst and fakest 'North Korea surveillance' accusations I've ever seen.

[–] Esoteir@hexbear.net 42 points 2 days ago (3 children)

how would you even enforce this lmao

[–] PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net 41 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Suppressing the technology is impossible. Targeting the payment processors is trivial.

[–] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Friendly reminder that Mullvad encourages payment in cash. Can't target that payment processor

[–] Blep@hexbear.net 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean the mail probably could intercept packages to mullvads addresses

[–] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Admittedly true, but way more work, and probably infeasible unless the UK restarted arbitrarily inspecting all mail

[–] darkcalling@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They don't do that there? I mean not open and inspect but inspect outside. In the US all pieces of mail are photographed for tracking people down after the fact.

Anyways as mail sorting is done automatically with computers blocking mailed payments to their address would be beyond trivial. Just have machines sort it straight to MI6 or the London Police or a special naughty bin. True I suppose people could use re-mailer services though those are kind of hard to find, kind of expensive, and most of them are for package forwarding for people buying from abroad so not the types of companies who would resist pressure on a front like this as this group of people would be more trouble than they're worth making up a fraction of their business.

[–] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes, blocking to certain addresses is probably feasible (though international mail pretty much exclusively ignores the address, so would be extra work).

But remailing here is a pretty cheap service, about 1 dollar per package. I daresay it'd be much more available and cheap if mail was being blocked for such things. And I fail to see why overseas remailers would ever feel at all "under pressure", they wouldn't care about UK laws.

Obviously yes at the end of the day there's a whole arms race to be had. My point really is just that paying in cash is exceptionally harder to seriously stop, it'd take new laws and major investment. Whereas card payments to all VPN providers can be stopped overnight with just like.. a private word from a government official.

[–] IncensedCedar@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago

Proton VPN and rise up VPN both offer free VPN options

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They'll block access to the VPN service's main webpage that sells the product, same as they block any other online service that does not comply with laws.

[–] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Get one VPN where you identify yourself. Then use it to bypass the block and get another VPN. Bam.

One kid with a VPN could make a lotta playground moolah by enabling others.

[–] whatdoiputhere12@hexbear.net 17 points 2 days ago

yeah if a vpn has no actual business in the uk, and they obviously tell the government to fuck off, what next?

[–] BeanisBrain@hexbear.net 38 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Why are all the Western countries trying to build their own Great Firewalls lately?

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 47 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Socialism had to isolate itself in order to survive in a world where capitalism surrounded it and sought to destroy it from all sides.

Capitalism is preparing for a world where China is the hegemony, where they have to isolate themselves in a capitalist bubble in order to survive.

It is the bourgeois state protecting itself in much the same way the socialist state protected itself.

[–] Sam@hexbear.net 39 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 23 points 2 days ago

Yeah exactly.

[–] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 15 points 2 days ago

Damn, that's going to suck

[–] sexywheat@hexbear.net 31 points 2 days ago

A number of reasons, one of them being that they lost control of the narrative and most young people all hate Pissreal and imperialism now

[–] JustSo@hexbear.net 24 points 2 days ago

Cuz we're winning and they're losing.

[–] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 18 points 2 days ago

Information control?

[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 16 points 2 days ago

In a way, they're sabotaging their future technological capabilities. Teens that are prohibited from using a VPN are not going to explore the field of networking as much.

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 37 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

In Soviet North China they ban vpns for underage kids they also paved over all the parks and made all public spaces pay to play yeonmi-park

[–] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Also this decision is made by a small cadre of largely unelected functionaries who have become so out of touch with the people because they're so privileged.

[–] Cysioland@lemmygrad.ml 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Some of them literally call themselves Lords

[–] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 24 points 2 days ago

Over half of them actually. There's way more Lords than MPs

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This would require proving your age to the VPN provider, which de-anonymises VPN usage.

[–] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 20 points 2 days ago

Regulations under subsection (1)—

(c) must make provision for the monitoring and effective enforcement of the child VPN prohibition.

I don't think that's a side effect. The law pretty explicitly requires monitoring of any kind that the Secretary of State decides.

[–] PaulSmackage@hexbear.net 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's the House of Lords. I could ask them to spell VPN and they'd start counting their fingers.

[–] XxFemboy_Stalin_420_69xX@hexbear.net 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

you will NOT jack off, so HELP me GOD!!!!!

Privacy is not to be permitted. Under 16s are not to be permitted encryption. No one is to have anything to hide except for the Government who will hide everything.