this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2025
345 points (97.5% liked)

People Twitter

8676 readers
883 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Nice apartment! I see you even hot parking space. And how's the rent?

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

Just keep the volume up and we're cool

[–] shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

How big are the stalls in the US? That looks absolutely massive compared to any I've seen here.

[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Stalls of this size are meant for wheelchair users to be able to maneuver their chairs and get on and off of them.

If there are multiple stalls usually only one of them will be this size. If there is only one then it will be like this.

[–] Bongles@lemmy.zip 1 points 16 minutes ago

Not to brag but I used to work in an office that had TWO of these bad boys.

[–] shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

Makes sense. I've only seen accessibility toilets be dedicated rooms, and without a stall since they usually aren't big enough anyway.

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Its probably just a single-person restroom.

There's been a trend to put those walls around the toilet in those restrooms, despite that you'd be the only one in there.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago (2 children)
[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Seems like a good day to make bathroom friends

[–] renrenPDX@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 hours ago

Or faulty latch, and door opened while seated…

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 7 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

My dude been skipping leg day every day.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Are those not women's legs?

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Sure looks like jeans and black Hanes boxer briefs. Balance of probability to me suggested dude, but obviously I have no inside knowledge.

[–] PeacefulForest@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Um, my legs look like this

And how rigorous are you about leg day?

[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 42 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Suspicious magnifying glass placement

Suspicious that you noticed it

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Four jobs ago, I worked at a location that had generally inadequate bathroom stalls. One of them entirely lacked the lock on the stall throughout my entire tenure there, meaning that sometimes taking this (metaphorical) position wasn't optional. Everyone avoided that stall when possible, but there weren't always other choices.

Fortunately it was a smaller stall, unlike the one pictured, so taller people could brace the door manually, but not everyone had the endurance or reach for that. In fact I once, in a moment of desperation, was convinced no one was in there and burst into it to the mutual surprise of the unexpected occupant and myself. (Totally my fault.)

Leaning into the stall to close the door for their subsequent privacy was one of the more awkward experiences of my life.

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You should have stood there, staring them in the eyes. Waiting. 

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

In this case, I was the intruder. Had I been the one who was interrupted, I might have considered that strategy.

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

As the intruder, that's what you should have done. Waited your turn 

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

After my last few posts I'm in a sentimental mood. I'm gonna tell a barely related story.

Apparently, when my mother was a kid some seventy to eighty years ago, her sisters had a stalker. As a result, their parents switched the rooms of their daughters. (Probably not the approach I would take, but since I didn't exist at this point I wasn't consulted.) My mom got a new room but was understandably worried about the stalker. She talked to her adopted sister - whom she liked much better than her biological ones - about her fears, saying "what if I wake up and he's at the window, staring at me? What would you do?"

The sister in question said "I'd stare right back at him!"

So, for the third time in my lemmy career, one time very recent: thanks for reminding me of my mom. Most recently I said thanks for doing so in an unconventional manner, but at this point I'm inclined to say thank you for reminding me she was unconventional.

[–] HairyHarry@lemmy.world 30 points 23 hours ago (10 children)

Is there any reasons you guys there over the atlantic prefer those creepy gaps under the stall doors / walls?

[–] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago

No, none of us do. Well, probably a small amount of us do, but they would be the exception that proves the rule.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 8 points 15 hours ago

Users of bathrooms don't prefer them. Bathroom owners do. Privacy would allow people to feel comfortable, which is the last thing the bathroom owners want.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 50 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

We all hate them. Please help.

[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 30 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Indeed.
Sometimes my back gets wet sliding under them.

[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

One of our airports had a large mixed-gender bathroom with fully-private stalls and it was the best public bathroom I’ve ever used, I assume to appeal to the international crowd.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Amazingly, McDonald's has pretty consistently provided the best public restroom experience for me. They're almost always clean and usually provide either a private room or at least a fully protected stall. Wal-Mart would be second best (in terms of consistent acceptability across locations). Though Wal-Mart toilet paper often has little embedded specks that make me uncomfortable (observed before use, not after).

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Couple months ago I found myself needing to stop at a McDonald's in probably one of the worst neighborhoods you can find outside of the inner city. Nature was calling and it seemed like my best option.

It was for paying customers only, fair enough, I made a token purchase of a McChicken and some fries, and got an employee to unlock the door for me.

I was greeted with that eerie blue light that bathrooms in places like this use to deter drug use because it makes it harder to find a vein.

It gave off an all-around really unsettling vibe, but I will admit that, at least as far as I could tell given the lighting, it seemed to be immaculately clean.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

As unsettling as that can be, I certainly prefer it to what I've seen at some rest stops - mostly in Pennsylvania, but I'm not well traveled - where, to discourage drug use, they have half (at best) stall doors which (by design) provide no privacy at all.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I once was in a McDonald's washroom in the very dirty city of Regina while traveling and it was life changing. While in the washroom this person comes storming in, drops trow and pushes their ass up to the stall wall (not the door but next to it) and just starts ass blasting. Very much liquid human waste is now spraying everywhere (due I assume to the pressure seal they have made with their ass on the wall). I was lucky and was washing my hands near the door and was able to exit without incident, but I do remember that there was another person in the very stall getting a colon pressure wash. I went to the counter and told the staff about it (hoping in vain they might be able to save the person trapped with nothing but that very open gap stall as their defense) and to my shock they did not seem at all surprised but just said, "oh them again". When I somewhat shaken ask what they mean by "them" they explain that its not just one ass blaster but a couple that both regularly run into the "wrong" bathroom at the same time (the gender of the ass blaster did not even occur to me, let alone rank high on my list of issues) and just, as they put it "make a bad mess" of the washroom. At this point I asked about what can be done about the person trapped in shit land, and the staff just looked at me like I grew a second head. They did not see the issue at hand, they just went "well that is where shit happens" and they can always clean off.

Now by this point the ass blasters have finished and left (no one seemed to even look at ether of them) and my food was ready (I ordered then went to the washroom). The staff member grabs my food and tells me not to worry too much about the event as it "only happens a few times a month". I get my food and leave passing by another staff member white in the face pushing a cleaning bucket towards the rooms "where shit happened". As I drive away eating my food I have the thought, I really should not be eating this, and I never saw the person in the stall leave.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I ... Don't know that I would have been eating that food, so agreed with you there.

Hopefully the person to whom shit happened is okay!

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It was years ago at this point, I hope they made it out. Wonder if it happened to anyone more then once.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

If that happened to me in that room, I might never go to the bathroom again; if I did, it would certainly not be in that room.

[–] skooma_king@piefed.social 25 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

We don’t prefer them. The people that own the buildings do because they are cheaper.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 3 points 14 hours ago

I think maybe it also makes it easier for the cleaners/security to see if there's someone hiding in the stall at closing time.

[–] HairyHarry@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

because they are cheaper

Not to give some rich idiot an idea, but so are no locks, no doors, no walls.

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 12 hours ago

How do i delete someone elses' post

[–] leverage 9 points 21 hours ago

I've seen one interpretation of our fire code result in each enclosed stall requiring their own flashing light and siren. So the expense to build really does add up. Every contractor knows how to do it the cheap way, anything else they charge a much higher rate to make it worth the trouble. Maybe some shit related to sex or drug use in bathrooms as well, I'd imagine the more secure it feels the more likely someone might see that as a safe thing to try, not saying that's a real thing but shit gets talked about on the news enough for it to be something the decision maker has in their head to be influenced one way.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago

No one prefers them

[–] Gobbel2000@programming.dev 4 points 19 hours ago

The gaps on the bottom and the top serve the important purpose of ventilation. It's a really effective design allowing vertical airflow. So yes, I do prefer air gaps over stinky boxes, and I have personally never seen a creep sticking their head under the gap.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Vile_port_aloo@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

Waiting for a John?

[–] SantasMagicalComfort@piefed.world 14 points 22 hours ago

Very smooth legs.

[–] MiDaBa@lemmy.ml 5 points 18 hours ago

Make sure you're friendly and provide a warm greeting to anyone who enters after you

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›