this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
222 points (98.3% liked)

PC Gaming

12821 readers
1097 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's going to be such a hack job with this takeover.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 5 points 7 hours ago

Man, they must really like soccer. I mean holy shit.

[–] Lazer365@feddit.nl 5 points 8 hours ago

I just figured out yesterday that you can ignore publishers on Steam, never again will I have to see an EA game in my recommendations.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

SA has a soon to be deady economy, because OIL doesnt last forever so they buy into whatever to keep thier country alive. SPORTSWASHIng , gamewashing.

[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I've been hearing it's running out for over 30 years. Is it actually almost gone now?

[–] MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

I don't think anybody really knows. My understanding is the problem is KSA reports unaudited reserve numbers, so you have to take them at their word. There's a lot of skepticism because they would report unchanged reserve numbers for years despite high exploitation. While they can certainly discover new reserves, it seems unlikely it would consistently be about equal to what they pumped out. I've read some analysts think they have less than half of what they report.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

people are buying EA games? Why tho?

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 3 points 7 hours ago

It’s a fucked up world.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 14 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Don't ever buy EA products again. No problem really.

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago

I know at the very least 1 person who plays FIFA. I wouldn't say that I am friends with this person, quite the opposite. But he is a classmate of my friends so they are friends with him. Even they wonder why would he keep buying FIFA each year.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

I wonder what they'll do with IPs like The Sims. I can't imagine they'll allow same-sex relationships, naturally, but I don't think they'll allow divorce, either. :S

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Doesn't matter, other games will replace them. Like InZoi.

Same happened with Rollercoaster Tycoon (Planet Coaster), SimCity (Cities Skylines)

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Yeah, I have those games, but I want to know what direction they'll take. I want to know how bold they would be if they wanted to.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

They might just sell the IP. I imagine they are mostly interested in the sports franchises.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 12 hours ago

soccer, WWE, maybe UFC in the future is where all the money is at.

[–] COASTER1921@lemmy.ml 3 points 13 hours ago

I suspect that they'd be more hands off than you may expect (if they chose to keep that IP at all). The sovereign wealth fund is first and foremost interested in growing their investment value. And this has only been further cemented as MBS has continued to stripped wahabists of power to the point that they have almost no state involvement anymore.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Why? Literally why would they give a shit? This only makes sense if you assume that they spent billions of dollars to export religious conservativism outside of Saudi Arabia. I dunno if you've noticed, but Saudi Arabia has been spending trillions of dollars to present a totally different, modern image to the world. The people spending the money don't actually give a shit about Allah. They only care what other people will submit to in Allah's name, and they know that's not going to fly outside their borders.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Saudi Arabia is a country with one of the strictest laws in the world. Why shouldn't anyone be suspicious of what they say or do? Why can't people have a healthy amount of distrust and skepticism of their actions if, as you said, they're trying to portray a different image of themselves to the world? Who says the mask can't come off under the right circumstances, like the shameless right-wing downturn of the US?

The Sims IP has always been one of the most welcoming and famous platforms for non-traditional values that directly contradict their country's principles. Because I don't know if you know, but homosexuality in Saudi Arabia is currently punishable by death. It's fair to imagine that some company-wide policy changes would take place when it's acquired to align with its own views, which also align with the Trump administration's crusade to eliminate liberal ideas. I mean, didn't they recently bribe him with a luxury jet? Don't you think they could have a broader joint interest at heart?

If franchises like Call of Duty have been targets of military marketing, it doesn't take much to imagine how a corporation from an authoritarian country like SA would at least attempt to rein in social values in The Sims if given the chance.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Okay, but why? The hypothesis that they bought an extremely successful business because they want to make money doesn't need any further explanation. What is the motivation for them to try to export their strict laws to other countries? You act like it gives them so much personal joy at taking away our gay kissing, that's reason enough.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 7 minutes ago* (last edited 2 minutes ago)

try to export their strict laws

No, not laws, but religious views and values. That's what their laws reflect. Religious people are famous for trying to proselytize, convert, and meddle because they have a very fundamental belief that they're dealing with larger forces of good and evil.

gives them so much personal joy at taking away our gay kissing

Again, please don't reduce my argument to absurdity. That is not a productive or respectful way of making your point.

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 10 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

If it's over 51% it's all of it for all practical reasons.

[–] C8r9VwDUTeY3ZufQRYvq@sopuli.xyz 3 points 16 hours ago

Agreed. I was already not buying EA games, so this doesn't change much at all.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 52 points 1 day ago (5 children)

They might as well. I can't avoid buying EA games any harder than I already do.

[–] Agent_Karyo@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Haven't bought an EA game since the SimCity 2013 reboot. They straight up lied about the nature of the game.

[–] watson@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

I remember that. Everyone was so fucking pissed.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] northendtrooper@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Its shockingly sad how what EA was back in the early 90s to what it is now.

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 7 points 14 hours ago (2 children)
[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

early 2000s EA was also on the horse. It used to be that when you hear "EA Games, challenge everything" upon opening a game, you knew that you are up for a good time. By the end of 00s that would drastically change

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

Disagree. They were more tolerable but very evil.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 13 hours ago

Not to mention prominently featuring transgender developers -- in the 80s!

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I remember when Skate 3 came out and people actually had positive opinions of EA and were excited about the games they made.

[–] djsaskdja@reddthat.com 5 points 16 hours ago

Dead Space too. They had a solid run in the late 2000s/early 2010s before doubling down on shit.

[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They always butchered games. What you're remembering are the games made by studios that EA purchased, made before they were gutted for IP.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I'll never forgive them for killing the Dungeon Keeper franchise when they bought Bullfrog. That was such a great game. Even today, I still play the original DK which came out in the 90s.

[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 3 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Yea. There have been a few spiritual successors that are pretty good, but none match the raw... villainy? No crazy, hyperstylized parody of itself, just pure calm confidence from the narrator while you play the bad guys in an otherwise normal fantasy setting? It's always great when a game just goes for it, and DK nailed it.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 14 hours ago

I played war for the overworld, but it wasn’t the same. Nothing can capture the magic of the actual games. The first one was the best, but dk2 was also decent

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Narrated by Tony Jay, the voice of Megabyte! Thurl Ravencroft tier, for sure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pistcow@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"So we're like, evil evil now" EA, probably.

[–] watson@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

When regular evil isn’t enough

[–] TotallyHuman@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If EA, having been purchased, is milked for cash, strip-mined for IP, and then unceremoniously abandoned, it will be very funny.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Journalists are about to become a playable faction in battlefield

[–] SaneMartigan@aussie.zone 6 points 18 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)

Or just part of the destructible environment.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

You can sell it all you want, you're not going to make me hate EA any more than I already do.

load more comments
view more: next ›