this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2025
46 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23177 readers
183 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/39552562

top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Vostok_@hexbear.net 10 points 23 hours ago

The tendency of the rate of profit to fall.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I have hope that the decline of the empire will enable revolutions around the world. We could see "global communism" by default as global capitalism collapses, while actually existing socialist states and new revolutionary governments form a new world system.

I... don't have a lot of hope inside the imperial core. I think it's gonna be barbarism.

[–] huf@hexbear.net 32 points 1 day ago

yeah, the europe and the US are probably going to have to go through like 7 collapses before there's any kind of societal consensus on reviewing white supremacy as a foundational idea

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago

I think it's gonna be barbarism.

already is, always was

[–] Blakey@hexbear.net 12 points 1 day ago

Nothing. The approaching climate catastrophe is civilization ending at best, we'll be doing well if humanity as a species makes it out of the 21st century. "Just" wide scale civilizational collapse would have been extremely likely even with the ~3 degrees of warming we would have gotten if we had pulled out all the stops ~2 years ago, but we didn't and we're getting a lot more than that.

Humanity is fucked and we seem determined to take a LOT of other life with us.

[–] trabpukcip@hexbear.net 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In our lifetime, we will be subjected to climate catastrophes that will make the previous hurricanes, floods, fire storms, heat domes, etc look like tutorial levels. These events will cause major internal and international migrations, and the western world will crack down on its populations while letting fewer desperate migrants in. Meanwhile, the younger generations, who are inheriting this vile shitshow, will have the opportunity to reject the system that brought them to this point. After they pick fascism, a whole lot of people will die, the fascists will eventually be defeated, and two or three generations from now, our grandchildren will build communism from the ashes

[–] Blakey@hexbear.net 5 points 20 hours ago

You are making the honestly very optimistic assumption that Homo sapiens isn't one of the victims of the ongoing mass extinction event.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 12 points 1 day ago

there are a lot of countries i don't live in

[–] moss_icon@hexbear.net 13 points 1 day ago

The fact that capitalism is collapsing faster than we had anticipated. People are going to get sick of this shit eventually.

[–] theoryenjoyer@hexbear.net 2 points 17 hours ago

Even a little bit of community can do a lot, sometimes it just helps you speak a few words in the right ears at the right time to make things happen. And making one or two new friends isn't that hard. If all of us on here can do that with principles and theory behind us, things can change faster than we think

I think it feels hopeless because we don't really see the widespread revolutionary potential until it all comes together (in the context of a well alienated society). Go join something, anything really and you'll meet some people waiting to become comrades

[–] Azarova@hexbear.net 7 points 23 hours ago

absolutely nothing lol. even if a global communist revolution erupted yesterday and won instantly and bloodlessly, we'd still be fucked by a collapsing biosphere. that hasn't happened, so we're fucked^2^. if things don't change extremely soon, i think we're far more likely to see eco-fascism grip the West than even just tepid social democracy (which is objectively the moderate wing yadda yadda) as the climate refugee crisis kicks in to full gear. but also lenin didnt think he'd see revolution either, so im open to being surprised, it's just impossible to keep actual hope alive given the circumstances. as other people said, no reason to give up trying though when the literal fate of humanity and most species is at stake this late in the game.

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 19 points 1 day ago

The stupidity and feebleness of modern capitalists

[–] RedSturgeon@hexbear.net 13 points 1 day ago

I don't see it happening in my lifetime. Maybe in another place. What keeps me hopeful is seeing socialist thought appearing through the cracks of the continuously fading away neoliberal order, despite everything they've tried to extinguish it.

My goal is to leave something, for those who come after me, one day they are going to succeed. That's what gives me hope. People have told me that my emotions make me weak and that's why I am a loser, but if that's true then why have the winners failed to accomplish anything? Endless wars doesn't seem like an accomplishment to me.

[–] someone@hexbear.net 17 points 1 day ago

The internalizing of American capitalism propaganda among wealthy Americans who forgot that it's supposed to be just propaganda and not a how-to.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 19 points 1 day ago

How much more fucked everything has visibly gotten in such a short time and how acutely aware most people are of it

[–] hello_hello@hexbear.net 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

That the DPRK still manages to exist. There's probably no greater proof that communism works than the DPRK surviving the Fukuyama end of history neoliberalism blitz and still being committed to improving the lives of its citizens.

Other than that, climate change.

[–] Confidant6198@lemmy.ml 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] hello_hello@hexbear.net 3 points 19 hours ago

Completely slipped from my mind, yes and Cuba.

Both the DPRK and Cuba have shown the the crushing sanctions (which to me feel like a practice environment for the scarcity post climate change) can be overcome through socialist organization and international solidarity.

nothing. good things do not happen in america

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 12 points 1 day ago
[–] towhee@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I do not think it will. If it does happen it will be unpredictable and triggered by an unrelated factor. All the successful revolutions of the 20th century (except perhaps Cuba's?) came in the wake of reality-overturning events like a world war or successful anti-colonial struggle. In the fiction book Green Mars (spoilers to follow) the Martian independence revolution is kicked off by massive collapse of the Antarctic ice sheet on Earth and subsequent 6 meter sea rise. So mostly it's about being ready to take advantage of events instead of building expressly toward revolution. And that event does not arrive on a schedule.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I do not think it will. If it does happen it will be unpredictable and triggered by an unrelated factor.

This sounds overly pessimistic to me, because unpredictable major events seem to be happening regularly, albeit not on a schedule. Look at COVID-19 for a huge example in all our lifetimes, and look at how much it was compounded in places like the US.

I agree with everything else, especially the last sentence. Building the Party and other summaries of the Russian Revolutions era show just how important and unintuitive or surprising opportunities can be. Father Gapon in the Russian Empire is a great example, the kind of person we collectively would likely (and for good reason) dismiss as a police collaborator/asset and a pro-Tsarist. But their milquetoast protest sparked the 1905 revolution, which in turn is generally considered a major factor in the 1917 revolutions.

[–] towhee@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago

Covid, big as it was, did not have the scale to actually trigger a revolution I don't think. I don't mean to dismiss the scale of suffering and death. But I think an event on the scale necessary to trigger a revolution would probably have to directly imperil and permanently, drastically change the lives of upwards of 25% of fighting-age people.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

But their milquetoast protest sparked the 1905 revolution, which in turn is generally considered a major factor in the 1917 revolutions.

Can you imagine if the No Kings photoshoot somehow inspired a revolution ten years from now?

[–] Bolshechick@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago

Absolutely nothing. There's no reason to be hopeful. BUT, if it doesn't happen pretty soon, it's over for humanity. So there's no reason to give up on trying either.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

Honestly I am expecting communist revolutions within the next decade. Just not in the imperial core. We will go through a significant period of pure barbarism before communism is attempted.

[–] 9to5@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Depends what you mean by that. Revolution in general ? In some parts of the world ? In some countries ? I think that is absolutely possible. Global communist revolution (and I dont mean to be a doomer) I dont think that is going to happen in the next 20 years. Its totally possible im wrong mind you im literally just going with my gut feeling here.

[–] Confidant6198@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wait, but I said "lifetime". Are you 70 already, my guy since you said "in 20 years" 😜

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think it's not a good idea to get your hopes up or to be certain about anything involving intelligent life much further than 2050.

I don't think people will be wiped out before 2100 barring nuclear war. Just lots and lots of death and suffering

[–] Confidant6198@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's not necessarily about extinction (though we're headed for, optimistically, at least +4C warming this century) but also about the incredibly uncertain future given the volatility of the current neoliberal order. I don't think anything is certain, nothing negative or positive. I guess that could be reason to have hope (better to be uncertain than certain of having no prospects) but I think you also have to acknowledge there's no reason to be optimistic either.

[–] BountifulEggnog@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

at least +4C warming

Yea this pretty much, everyone who's optimistic is ignoring climate change. Like always.

[–] InappropriateEmote@hexbear.net 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yes, this. I've been called doomer for talking like this before, but I don't think even most leftists, many of whom I look up to and defer to on all things historical and political, really grasp how fundamental and existential climate change really is as a threat to humanity and to much of the biosphere. A lot of times I see otherwise cogent and thoughtful conversation about potential future trajectories, discussing how climate change is going to throw an extra wrench in the machinations of the evolving material conditions, adding more variables that could slow or speed sociopolitical development towards communism, basically make geopolitics more chaotic and unpredictable for a while, but that ultimately, communism will emerge the dominant form in the next couple centuries. And it's like... my siblings and comrades, the shit that's coming down the pipe is a lot bigger of a game changer than a wrench and some extra variables. It's a mass extinction event we've only just barely entered.

I would agree, given enough time, communism will win. But that "given enough time" piece is the load-bearing part of that phrase. What we are looking at from realistic projections right now for what is locked in to happen over the next couple centuries is literal civilizational collapse. Not just the collapse of an empire, but a total destruction of the systems we rely on to maintain, for example, intercontinental interaction, let alone global trade and complex distribution of labor. That means no global communism. IF our species survives, which is also by no means a guarantee and also teeters on the precipice of exactly how much average global heat ends up increasing, it means primitive communism in small pockets if we're lucky. Our only hope of avoiding this is large scale revolution basically immediately. It may not have to start in the imperial core (which I think we all agree is extremely unlikely), but it will have to quickly subdue the imperial core which is responsible for the vast majority of climate change, and obviously is the biggest threat to revolution anywhere. The imperial core will have to be forced into rapid degrowth. The fucking clock is ticking here, and it's not looking promising. But that's no excuse to be "doomer," (and by that, I mean "give up") it's the opposite, it's all the more reason we need to do everything we can no matter how significant the sacrifice to tear down capitalism and imperialism now.

[–] Blakey@hexbear.net 4 points 20 hours ago

The imperial core will have to be forced into rapid degrowth.

The imperial core has nukes. We are in fact screwed beyond any hope of redemption.

[–] WideningGyro@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I once had a heart-to-heart with my sister, who is a kind, intelligent and perceptive person, who set me on the path that led me to communism, but is now a comfortable suburban lib, and I tried to explain this to her- the gravity of climate change. She looked at me and just said "I have two kids. I need to believe that things will get better." There was such a pleading, desperate look in her eye that I just had to drop it. If I'm right, she's going to have to face it someday anyway, and if I'm wrong - well, then the future is better than I can imagine right now.

Same with my parents, who are at their best well-meaning libs. There's just no point in trying to get them to understand what's happening. They'll be long gone by the time everything truly breaks down. I don't really feel like I have the right to force the realization that the world they've inhabited all of their life won't really be there for their grand-kids.

[–] Blakey@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She looked at me and just said "I have two kids. I need to believe that things will get better."

I totally get it but at the same time this is a great example of why we're fucked. Anyone with the power to change anything flatly refuses to. Anyone decent enough to want to change anything refuses to acknowledge the necessity, because it's depressing. But refusing to admit it's happening doesn't make it not happen. And so humanity as a whole has their head wedged firmly up their ass and we march straight into hell.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago

I think we're deeply steeped in a moral code that makes the proposition that the kind, most loving thing to do right now is to form an armed guerilla secret army absolutely unthinkable.

I deeply sympathize with both your position and your sister's. But I also can't help but remember that the only thing that can possibly save us from the worst outcome is the full recognition of how bad the situation is, how immediate it is. That desperation in your kind-hearted sister's eye is the only thing, on a mass scale, that has a chance of mitigating the worst of the apocalyptic scenarios. I know it's easy for me to say, and I'd be lying if I claimed to be doing everything within my power to stop capitalism, but I think confronting reality must happen if we are to have any hope at all for a world worth living in for our children. Because confronting it and truly recognizing the unimaginable horror of it is the only way that people will ever get mobilized to do something about it (beyond the bullshit pressure-release-valve feel-good non-solution pablum like "green capitalism"). If she let down that wall of pretense that things will be ok for her kids, that wall she already knows at least on some level is a lie, and actually internalizes the hell that her children are going to have to face (whether she acknowledges it or not), then what's left to do but to fight against it? Fight it for their sake, because there will come a time for them when they will have no choice but to fight it. Existential-scale climate catastrophe is coming either way, but even as merciful as the sand is, the longer we keep our heads buried in it in lieu of action, the worse the catastrophe will be. And by worse, it could even be the difference between extinction or survival.

They're murdering our children. It is absolutely understandable that we would want to look away and deny this. But if staring that fact in the face is the only way to get them to stop murdering our children, then aren't we obligated to look? There's no easy answer here, but I do think there is an answer.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago

and just said "I have two kids. I need to believe that things will get better." There was such a pleading, desperate look in her eye that I just had to drop it.

jesus christ having kids is a horrible thing to do to kids

[–] 9to5@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well I agree with Funkystuff that there is little point in trying to look too far into the future. We dont know whats gonna happen in the grand scope of things. Im not that old but I also dont plan for much further then the next 2-3 years and I take my life a day at a time.

[–] UmbraVivi@hexbear.net 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Nothing ever happens until it does.

[–] Blakey@hexbear.net 3 points 23 hours ago

The problem isn't that "nothing will happen" it's that it no longer matters what happens because we have already fucked the environment so entirely.