Disbar the whole bunch
this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
237 points (99.6% liked)
politics
26466 readers
2356 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Sound like there will me more criminal indictments tossed.
LOONY Judges are IGNORING our legal and legitimate court filings. I always said the judicial branch is the very least good branch of government. Totally redundant to our very most good system of EXTRA-Judicial. Get rid of these crooked judges. Thank you for your attention to this matter
At this point, why are they even showing up in court? They're just going to do what they want against court orders anyway.
You know how rapists force themselves on others? This same mentality seems to be shared by trump, his cabinet, and a lot of the gop.
I mean, a good chunk of higher level trump admin stooges are rapists, sooooo no surprise.
Only a good chunk?
There's gotta be a token non-rapist in there somewhere, right?
Considering how incompetent they are, it wouldn't surprise me at all if a staffer or two missed their Epstein Island onboarding without their supervisor noticing.
SCOTUS anointed a king.
Dang it! That's ALL we can Do! If ONLY she was Poor we could Enforce our Ruling!
-Judges!
Does double jeopardy come into play if a prosecution is thrown out for not being a validly appointment AG, or is it like an annulment where it kind of never happened?
Double jeopardy is not a factor in this situation, because the first jeopardy "does not attach" until a jury is seated and sworn in for trial, or when a guilty plea is accepted. The trial by jury is the "jeopardous" part of the criminal justice process. If the case is tossed before that point for any reason, then there is no jeopardy bar to refiling.
If a trial starts, but ends in a mistrial, then it is usually possible to go to another trial, even though jeopardy "has attached". A mistrial ruling effectively "unwinds" the entire trial like it never happened.
or is it like an annulment where it kind of never happened?
This is what Judge Currie said in her opinion. The indictments didn't happen because they were run entirely by a pretend US attorney.
Well weren’t they falsely indicted on the very last day of the statute of limitations for the crimes in question?
I don’t think double jeopardy would apply, but that would…
(…this is just the opinion of regular guy without formal education or training in the field in question …)
There's like a 6 month grace period after the SoL if there's a problem with the indictment, where they could refile. I'm not sure what issues they're allowed to fix with that grace period, but there is some time there.
Is there not being an indictment a problem with the indictment?
A question I certainly feel pretty much answers itself. Though, with this administration and how they have bent judges to their will before, I haven't the foggiest fucking idea how the courts will answer it.
For Comey's. I was more concerned with these new ones. Like if whatever this power play was they were pulling, if it was hurting their revenge scheme or of it really didn't matter much more than wasted time.
The third box failed about a month ago, if not earlier.