this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
327 points (99.1% liked)

News

33299 readers
2175 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new feature meant to boost transparency on Elon Musk’s platform relies on data that researchers say can be inaccurate or easily spoofed.

Advocates for transparency on social media cheered this weekend when X, the app owned by tech billionaire Elon Musk, rolled out a new feature that disclosed what the company said were the country locations of accounts.

The feature appeared to unmask a number of accounts that were portraying themselves as belonging to Americans but in reality were based in countries such as India, Thailand and Bangladesh.

But by Monday, the effectiveness and accuracy of the feature were already in question, as security experts, social media researchers and two former X employees said the location information could be inaccurate or spoofed using widely available technology, such as virtual private networks (VPNs), to hide their locations.

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 57 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Well now that it got out in the open, I doubt troll accounts will get caught off guard like that again. At least not the smart / state sponsored ones

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

I mean if it's based on the time of creation it would to me that's the idea of it though. IE the troll accounts that have spent 5 years building up a following, the only way to salvage them if their creation location was bad, is to delete them and start a new one from a VPN in the country they are supposed to be from. At which point smart people are going to note "the wave of accounts made in 2025-2026 and note that timing".

Course unless Elon works to change that rule, not tie in the original country etc, or make a blue checkmark feature "anti-doxing" to protect your private information like country.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don’t like how there’s a bunch of misinformation mixed into this whole situation. Lots of fake accounts got passed around as legit ones.

It almost feels like an exercise in sowing confusion and muddying the waters to me.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Absolutely. Release something to sow discord, while revealing truth. Confusion, acceleration, anger, fear.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah Xwitter has shut the feature off temporarily so that the accounts that were exposed by it can set up VPNs and look like they totally come from the United States and not the countries that they were discovered to have been coming from.

[–] heavyboots@lemmy.ml 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Honestly, I would be very much down to see this on Lemmy too. "This account was registered from country X" "Last post from country Y" (Or alternatively, "Last post from known VPN" so you at least know it's happening.)

It adds some interesting context at the very least.

[–] VeganBtw@piefed.social 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Trolls and troll farms will circumvent this as soon as it becomes a feature.

[–] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Naaaaaaaah, as if any comment could contain BS
This User commented from Ilha da Queimada Grande

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Posted from the Thaumasia Quadrangle

[–] survirtual@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Did you know Americans (and other nationals of any country) also live in other countries? Personally, I could be in several different countries at any given time, not accounting for VPN use.

The feature doesn't reveal much.

That said, I also support the feature because it is data held by privileged users already. Make all privileged data public. No one should have more rights than anyone else, besides the greater rights we have over ourselves.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Did you know Americans (and other nationals of any country) also live in other countries? Personally, I could be in several different countries at any given time, not accounting for VPN use.

So what? So for every 1 in 100 times an "American" account is revealed to be posting from overseas it's actually an American? 1% false positives, I'll take that, fine. This still seems useful to me.

[–] survirtual@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I already said it is useful to know. It isn't useful to take drastic action with, however.

"That it is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer."

  • Benjamin Franklin
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I travel constantly and use Lemmy. I don’t know what I’d do if someone attacked any opinion or statement I made because of the country I posted from. Have to explain each time why my IP says whatever country?

[–] survirtual@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Right. It is a bad mechanism if used for that purpose.

The correct way to do what they actually want is to have a global, anonymous nationality verification. There are all kinds of ways to do this that aren't dystopian. Then, if desired, there can be attestation to nationality without disclosure of personal information.

That would allow us to appropriately measure the national origins of content, and I could see the use of that.

Instead, people are supporting a deeply flawed mechanism as "good enough," as they always do. It is lazy, sloppy, and dangerous.

To that end, if it continues to go that way, there are countless ways to undermine it. That's also what makes it so stupid. Dishonest actors will easily circumvent it, and honest actors will once again be left suffering.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

bots. I wonder how many are here ?

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This made me momentarily miss TOTALLYNOTROBOTS

[–] Infinite@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

HAVE YOU PROCESSED UPGRADING YOUR TARGETING ALGORITHM TO INCREASE YOUR HIT RATIO?

[–] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And then the guy says, "Well, it's a hell of an act. What do you call yourselves?" He says, "The Aristocrats."

Truly you are a connoisseur...

[–] big_slap@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

did not read the article ywt, but I have this pic floating around in a group chat im in, no idea if its true but lmao

[–] rainwall@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] DoYouNot@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Snoops was unable to verify it. Do you have a source for that claim that it's real?

I think a feature like this should really be part of an internet transparency law...

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Glad Elon revealed so much.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Anyone have a theory for why he's doing this now?

[–] chuckd@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (4 children)

My theory: I doubt Musk had any hands on direct control in the decision. If he did, the feature would probably still be active. My guess is one of the developers quietly pushed the update because, looks around, reasons. It was reversed so quickly I have a feeling Musk was blindsided like most of us.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 days ago

I bet, musk demanded a thing, was told it would be a bad idea, he fired that guy, the next guy just does what he says, musk is completely shocked that the entire movement telling him he's cool were just foreign psyops and he ordered it shut off. Fired the guy who listened to him, for good measure.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If he did, the feature would probably still be active.

I have a feeling he would never approve it to begin with.

[–] chuckd@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Exactly my point. Once he found out about the change it was squashed.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

Oh shit, I didn't realize they reversed it. That makes sense now.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

"oops I accidentally introduced a bug that caused it show up, my bad, I'll fix it riiiiiiiiiight after my break"

I say, it should be mandatory to show the country of origin on social media. Including if it’s via vpn