this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
328 points (99.1% liked)

News

35962 readers
3090 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new feature meant to boost transparency on Elon Musk’s platform relies on data that researchers say can be inaccurate or easily spoofed.

Advocates for transparency on social media cheered this weekend when X, the app owned by tech billionaire Elon Musk, rolled out a new feature that disclosed what the company said were the country locations of accounts.

The feature appeared to unmask a number of accounts that were portraying themselves as belonging to Americans but in reality were based in countries such as India, Thailand and Bangladesh.

But by Monday, the effectiveness and accuracy of the feature were already in question, as security experts, social media researchers and two former X employees said the location information could be inaccurate or spoofed using widely available technology, such as virtual private networks (VPNs), to hide their locations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] heavyboots@lemmy.ml 29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Honestly, I would be very much down to see this on Lemmy too. "This account was registered from country X" "Last post from country Y" (Or alternatively, "Last post from known VPN" so you at least know it's happening.)

It adds some interesting context at the very least.

[–] VeganBtw@piefed.social 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Trolls and troll farms will circumvent this as soon as it becomes a feature.

[–] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Naaaaaaaah, as if any comment could contain BS
This User commented from Ilha da Queimada Grande

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Posted from the Thaumasia Quadrangle

[–] survirtual@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Did you know Americans (and other nationals of any country) also live in other countries? Personally, I could be in several different countries at any given time, not accounting for VPN use.

The feature doesn't reveal much.

That said, I also support the feature because it is data held by privileged users already. Make all privileged data public. No one should have more rights than anyone else, besides the greater rights we have over ourselves.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Did you know Americans (and other nationals of any country) also live in other countries? Personally, I could be in several different countries at any given time, not accounting for VPN use.

So what? So for every 1 in 100 times an "American" account is revealed to be posting from overseas it's actually an American? 1% false positives, I'll take that, fine. This still seems useful to me.

[–] survirtual@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I already said it is useful to know. It isn't useful to take drastic action with, however.

"That it is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer."

  • Benjamin Franklin
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I travel constantly and use Lemmy. I don’t know what I’d do if someone attacked any opinion or statement I made because of the country I posted from. Have to explain each time why my IP says whatever country?

[–] survirtual@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Right. It is a bad mechanism if used for that purpose.

The correct way to do what they actually want is to have a global, anonymous nationality verification. There are all kinds of ways to do this that aren't dystopian. Then, if desired, there can be attestation to nationality without disclosure of personal information.

That would allow us to appropriately measure the national origins of content, and I could see the use of that.

Instead, people are supporting a deeply flawed mechanism as "good enough," as they always do. It is lazy, sloppy, and dangerous.

To that end, if it continues to go that way, there are countless ways to undermine it. That's also what makes it so stupid. Dishonest actors will easily circumvent it, and honest actors will once again be left suffering.