this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
315 points (99.1% liked)

News

36891 readers
2510 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Design flaws caused a Tesla Model 3 to suddenly accelerate out of control before it crashed into a utility pole and burst into flames, killing a woman and severely injuring her husband, a lawsuit filed in federal court alleges.

Another defect, with the door handle design, thwarted bystanders who were trying to rescue the driver, Jeff Dennis, and his wife, Wendy, from the car, according to the lawsuit filed Friday in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington.

Wendy Dennis died in the Jan. 7, 2023, crash in Tacoma, Washington. Jeff Dennis suffered severe leg burns and other injuries, according to the lawsuit.

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 39 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Yea I love EVs but wtf, stop making the handles recessed. It doesn't add much to range and it only makes using the car harder. I have an EV9 and I hate the handles. Just let us push the handle to pop it out like old entertainment center glass doors.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

There’s also no reason that it’s a software handle. The interior “handles” on the model 3 I’m led to believe are a button with no connection to the handle and there’s an emergency release buried somewhere in the back seat. Saving $0.50 per car just like GM. “The lawsuits are cheaper.”

The rapid acceleration is fun but the average person who’s trying to take off their sweater or reach for their water bottle or whatever in the car is going to accidentally jam the pedal down and kill themselves. I suspect all these “unintended sudden acceleration” are just someone mashing the pedal and not having the reaction time to lift off. Almost every gas car will give you time and audible indication to react. Electric cars - people carriers, with screaming toddlers and pets, not sporty ones - simply reach 100mph in 7 seconds.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Oh yes I agree, the acceleration without a way to limit it is crazy. At least with the EV9 I can set it to eco and not have an accidental warp speed but it's still too much sometimes. Mine came with the boost feature enabled and no way to disable it. I refuse to allow my teenage son to learn to drive in it without a way to limit its torque. I am gonna go out and get him an old fashioned beater. EVs need a training mode that forces it to act more like a ICE car. Might get worse efficiency but it's safer.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Perhaps an unpopular opinion but I think that the one-pedal kinda leads into this as well. You don’t remove your foot from the pedal to decelerate - in fact you keep pressure on it but less than while maintaining speed - and a twitch the wrong way makes it take off.

I am reminded that hand controls for driving are one-pedal, but they’re built backwards from the one-pedal in EVs. Push to stop, pull to start. That means that momentum pushes you into the brakes.

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Wait, evs don’t have a separate brake pedal?

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

https://youtu.be/U0YW7x9U5TQ?t=195

They do, but many EVs offer a mode (“one-pedal mode”) in which lift-off enters regeneration mode, and it is possible to drive entirely without touching the brake pedal. I think most do a “blended brake” which means that pressing the brake partway uses regen and then pressing harder uses actual brakes.

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago

Thanks for the info. That’s horrifying.

People can’t even drive properly with both pedals..

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

no, they have a brake pedal. One pedal driving just means the car slows more using regeneration and you less frequently need to brake.

[–] midnight@lemmy.today 1 points 4 months ago

they do. EVs just have regenerative braking built-in, so lifting your foot off the accelerator slows the car down considerably because the spinning of the motor is used to charge the battery. Several carmakers include various levels of regenerative braking as options.

[–] gramie@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

In the Hyundai ionx 6, you can set the driving mode you prefer. Regular mode with accelerator and brake, and four different levels of regenerative braking, or a special mode that only uses one pedal.

You can also select the driving mode, so the extreme acceleration is only available if you choose "sports mode".

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (4 children)

There’s also no reason that it’s a software handle.

There is a reason. It would be easy to argue its not worth it though.

When you pull the door handle the glass window retracts below the rubber weather stripping, then the door latch unlocks and you open the door. When you close the door and it latches, the window moves back up into the weather stripping creating a tight seal.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

Mustangs have been using a window-retract feature with mechanical handles since at least 2015 (S550 generation). I've had to open them with dead batteries and they opened fine without the retraction, though I'm sure it wears the rubber strip faster. I believe the Audi A5/A7 family has done the same for years. While frameless doors have been around for decades, the seal IS different on auto-drop doors to improve sealing. Regardless, as you said, "removing the mechanical handle" has a reason, and it's incredibly easy to argue against. Like many other Tesla design decisions, it's a cost-saving measure disguised as a functional necessity.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

BMW has been doing this with mechanical handles for 30 years just fine.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

GM killed a few Boomers in Corvettes. Roasted to death because they could not figure out how to get out of the car when the battery died. No one reads the fucking manual.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

which is something every designer knows. if your design requires someone to read the manual, you're a bad designer.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

Ain’t that the truth.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

People built this into the Smart Fortwo with a couple chips and wires. I can’t find a reference because it was about 15 years ago they did it, but it wasn’t complicated and the door latch remained entirely mechanical. I think that it was, in turn, a replication of another car’s feature which did this back in the 80s.

I think it’s 99% cost savings.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

Tony stark did it in a cave. With a box of scraps.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

it's also safety, mechanical releases can open under strong crash Gs.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

That is not a good reason, that is software built to compensate for a stupid hardware design

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

That is not a good reason,

I didn't say it was a good reason. The OP said there was no reason. There is a reason.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

You said there was no reason. There is a reason. You didn't ask for a good reason. It's also by absolutely no means unique to Tesla, despite how it is portrayed in articles like this.

Tesla isn't the first manufacturer to use frameless windows by any means. Audi, Toyota, Honda, Mercedes, Volkswagen, Mini, and Subaru just to name a few, have all used them in various "luxury" or higher end models over the years. It's perceived as luxury vehicle design, so it gets used quite a bit.

The handle not physically manipulating a latch also isn't unique. Corvette's have done this for years. Many recent vehicles from Lexus, Audi, Ferrari, Fiat, Lincoln, and Dodge again to name a few also use them, regardless of the flush exterior handle design. The handle design itself isn't the issue with these deaths, it's the electrical system failing. The flush handles causes issues with things like ice build-up, not being unable to open the door after a crash.

Articles like this always point to these issues, and act like they're unique to Tesla, but they're not. It's the same as it's always been, Tesla headlines get clicks, which drives interaction and sharing exactly like here, which all lead to increased advertising revenue.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Corvette’s have done this for years.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/man-his-dog-found-dead-after-becoming-trapped-inside-corvette-n373316

This is America, you don't sue for any reason other than the company has a lot of money and will likely settle.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

No I didn't, I am not the person the previous post replied to

[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

If it’s a choice between having the car look sleeker and not killing a few dozen people, I’m sure Musk is going to choose the former.

[–] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

They should stop with all these funky handles. Took a BYD cab the other day and it took me almost a minute to figure out how to open the door from inside to get off.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 28 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is a reminder that if you own a car, get a window breaker/seat belt cutter tool, and keep it in an easy-to-reach location in your car. They cost less than $10. After a crash, doors can get stuck or they may be locked, and seat belts may be hard to disengage. These tools are not only useful for your own car. If any bystander had that tool, they could have assisted regardless of the car model.

[–] seiniku@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

Teslas have laminated side windows, so they break more like a windshield. They would still need to be cut away somehow after breaking them

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Tesla tests in production. People die. This is super simple.

[–] jdredbeard@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And "Special K" Musk broke the agencies regulating his products while at doge

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Yep, and got all his active investigations quashed. Because nothing matters and what if it did.

[–] 18107@aussie.zone 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Move fast and break people

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 months ago

Man, imagine if Musk could just tell his fleet of cars to accelerate into the nearest utility pole or off the nearest bridge. He could just push that patch down to anybody he wants. Probably completely untracked.

Eh, he most likely could do that. Reason#253 why I wouldn't buy a Tesla.

[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

I will never assosiatr Tesla with actual company name. Tesla (OG) did invent bunch of things. Company should be named Edison at least.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

How do we know its a "design flaw" and not a murder via remote car control? These kind of crashes should be treated as potential murders until it can be shown otherwise.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Another defect, with the door handle design, thwarted bystanders who were trying to rescue the driver, Jeff Dennis, and his wife, Wendy, from the car

I don't get this argument. In most cars door lock automatically and don't unlock in case of a crash. The bystanders wouldn't be able to open the door in vast majority of modern cars. In Tesla you may not be able to open to door from the inside as well which is worse but I don't know what defect they are talking about.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago

They are talking about the defect that will make the most money. All cars autolock and cannot be opened regardless of handle or not. This is why firemen just jam an axe and twist or use a Halligan.