this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
286 points (98.3% liked)

Fuck AI

4652 readers
1391 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 days ago

If chat control was supposed to save the children then why is this still alive?

It was never about the children

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 day ago

Is this some covert advertising for nudify? I wonder how much search activity for it increased with these articles.

[–] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This new tech means we need to get over nudity and what even is real vs fake in all media. Causing harm due to bodies, let alone fake ones is a societal and cultural failure.

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is why futurama and starship troopers both have mixed showers

[–] atx_aquarian@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

No, Fry, you're just in the women's shower.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Okay, I'm not in pro, nor opposed to fake nudes. But let's think about why they exist. We want to see people naked having sex. Its a type of entertainment and the performers are real live actors. That industry will collapse as we know it if AI takes over. Either that or Nabisco will add sex pictures on their chocolate wrappers because porn stars will just be another naked person having sex for a few bucks.

I for one really would like normal people having sex for my entertainment. If we let AI get the best of ourselves, porn will be, one day soon, gone forever! Muscle guys will forget how to pose together with another five guys so we can still see their penises going in and out of the actresses vagina. The actresses will not known how to prepare mentally and physically to be stretched in such an extreme way. That requires years of practice. I'm only half joking, it definitely takes some time to stretch out the various orifices in such a way.

I propose to only watch non-AI porn, because that's the only way to preserve our culture. That's the only way to keep the actors practicing their moves, the actresses practicing their orgasms and the talent acquisition team hard at work! They need to keep those audition couches filled and warm! And what about the support teams?

The camera guys need to remember the traditional ways of getting out of the ways of the balls swinging. The make-up girls, the fluffers, the microphone guy, the language translation teams and the special effects guy all need jobs! I mean...waka waka waka, 70's style music doesn't write itself! And the cleanup crue? They need the job! And they are ready with brushes, brooms, spatula, water buckets, stain removers, etc. And the furniture guys? Selling the odd couch or bed at consignment. Same for the dressing teams.

Its an industry we must keep supporting. Porn is us, porn is human. Thank you!

I'll take my check when you guys are done fondling each other.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That was great, thanks.

It does make me wonder if the traditional criticism of porn will go away with AI porn taking over.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

It'll be like having a nack for old art forms...and so we went to the theater and watched them do 7 different classical porn positions... There was doggie, reverse cow girl, spitroast. It looked so real! It was a great play!

[–] EgoNo4@lemmy.world 102 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Billions of dollars poured into AI for... Nudes. The stupidity of humanity has no boundaries...

[–] TriangleSpecialist@lemmy.world 62 points 3 days ago

Techbros trying desperately to solve the very real problem of them not getting any through removing that little obstacle in their way: consent.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

One of the first pieces of recorded video was porn. New same as the old.

[–] EgoNo4@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

I'm fairly certain that one was consensul though.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 37 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I fully understand this girl and I wish her well but this is a genie that left a bottle that it will never again get back in to, I'm afraid

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We can push this so far underground that the only people who use this are 4chan creeps on the dark web, we cant destroy AI but we can push it to the fringes

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No you cannot, not really.

There are hundreds of open and freely available nudifying apps out there that you can run yourself. Even if you get then off the internet, which you can't, they'll still be out there and they'll still be improved.

That genie is long gone, it should simply never have been a thing to begin with. I think it's also the lesser of evils that will be coming from AI, unfortunately, so there is that too.

You can try to make these apps harder to get but that mostly will hide visibility, not availability nor the use either.

Most humans want to see all other humans naked, and we prohibit that. There is a huge market, the tools are there, prohibition will do exactly as much as prohibiting prostitution and alcohol, we all know how well those have worked.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Imagine an app is banned from the app store.

Do you actually think normal people would have any idea how to get around that? They don't know how to do anything.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

It's like cleaning: You'll never get your space 100% spotless, and trying it will yield diminishing returns. Thus, the aim is to do "good enough" for the given context (an operating theatre may have higher standards than a storage room in your basement, for instance).

Likewise, pushing harmful things to the fringes has to be "good enough".

[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Push it on to credit card processors, webhost operators, domain registrars etc proceeds of crime.

Edit: they are getting money from somewhere to run the computers these models run on.

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I don’t want credit card processor being the judge of what I can spend my money on or domain registrars being the judge of what websites I can visit.

The person who did a crime should be taken to court and all the intermediaries should have the excuse of being neutral.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 3 days ago (5 children)

There is no way back on that.

I can run these models on my local machine. It's not even a complex model.

This lawsuit is targeting the profiteers because that's the only reasonable recourse for an individual.

The criminal side of things is something a prosecutor needs to handle. Making this a priority becomes a political situation because it requires specific resources.

[–] Son_of_Macha@lemmy.cafe 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe we need to start pointing out it didn't make people naked, it just fits a naked body it saw in training under the person's head. It's Photoshop but faster.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

Not exactly. Head swaps have been a thing for a while.

These models match the body shape. They are essentially peeling back the layers of clothing. The thinner those layers the more accurate it can be.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] brianpeiris@lemmy.ca 31 points 3 days ago (6 children)

There ought to be a legal fund for these deepfake lawsuits so we can sue every one of these scummy companies out of existence. I'd donate to it.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›