
Venezuela empty airspace at this moment according to the flight tracking website.
😓
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.
All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body.
If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include not just the twitter.com URL but also Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source (archive.today, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org). Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed.
Mass-tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken Markov chain bot will result in a comm ban.
Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.
Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned.
Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society.

Venezuela empty airspace at this moment according to the flight tracking website.
😓
Pete Hegseth has Ordered a Military Strike on a Surviors of a Previously Bombed Vessal , apperently with the verbal order "kill them All" ... Meaning ordering Military Strikes on Helpless survivors. (washington Post) This is a clear Violation of the Hague convention :"it is especially forbidden [...] to declare that no quarter will be given" Article 23 (D).
but even that would first need a "War" to be present , so he simply Ordered the Murder of Survivors (kill them all) . Making the hole commandchain liable for "well not even war crimes / but Murder" and explaining this Democrat video . Crime is Punishable by Death in US Law .
JAG (i know that from this Series) , > UNANIMOUSLY considers both the giving and the execution of these orders constitute war crimes, murder, or both.
(proably connected with the Mark Kelly thing)
I remember JAG for this PowerPoint slide of theirs:

i remeber them from a series "JAG" , and in the Intro of this here where jets Flying , aircraft carriers and all of that , so i watched it to see some cool Military stuff. But it was jsut boring Lawyer stuff..
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Hegseth could kill a truckload of infants in front of the UN and mail their corpses to the ICC and the only thing that would happen to him is a nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize
dude comes from Fox News , he has no Beltway support and he had just started this Political Prosecution of former General Mark Kelly (who certainly has) , while normaly nothing will ever come out of this (
, in the Context of this elite fighting , something might will..
Apparently it was a Seal team six/DEVGRU double tap strike on injured survivors clinging to the burning boat. Which makes sense, DEVGRU and Delta force are really the most sociopathic of all the special forces in the US (they're kind of a "best of the best" of the special forces, so it's a self selection for that) and will kill anyone, no questions asked...
Now, I might be misremembering things, but didn't even the literal fucking Nazis start out still saving maritime survivors? The guys with fucking skulls on their caps?
, but like the US military instead

They (the US media) will just call every strike drug-related. They know it is weak, but what is the job of a journalist if not reprinting US press releases. My guess is that they are begging the government to come up with something better. NYT;

"Venezuelan military units that ... support Mr Maduro."
Imagine! The audacity of these soldiers supporting their democratically elected president!
Reminds of how they used to talk about "security forces" loyal to "Mr Assad".
Reminds of how they used to talk about "security forces" loyal to "Mr Assad".
It's a lot more delusional than that even (though that was already ridiculous), because Maduro is much more popular than Assad.
I agree Maduro enjoys every high levels of popular support but it is a myth that Bashar was unpopular.
In 2009 he was the most popular leader in the Arab world.
Theres a lot of reasons why Venezuela and Syrua situation are not the same buts its just not correct to say Assad was this widely unpopular leader before the al qaeda nato mossad "revolution" started.
Theres a lot of reasons why Venezuela and Syrua situation are not the same buts its just not correct to say Assad was this widely unpopular leader before the al qaeda nato mossad "revolution" started.
I'm not necessarily saying unpopular, just not as popular as Maduro, but I was also talking about near the end. Understandably, I don't think the "revolution" helped his popularity.
Yeah
Syria took 14 years to fall. The "chemical weapons" narratives and Qatari/Emirati/Saudi news outlets smearing Assad 24/7 for 14 years.
And for the last few years the US and Turkey were occupying all the most important natural resources and fertile land.
At the start of the war when the CIA instructed Abu Bakr al Baghdadi to send Jolani into Syria to create al Nusra, the "Syrian opposition" pulled from a large force of well-armed fascist death squads (ISI and AQI) in Iraq that had spent the previous half decade in Iraq practicing how to orchestrate suicide bombings and sectarian mass murders.
Meanwhile the "Venezuelan opposition" cant even gather a thousand people for a rally. Unless the US military secret has secretly mobilized the Colombian paramilitary groups as a proxy army then there is nothing comparable to the scale of the Timber Sycamore operation.
The US could still kill a lot of people and try to destroy the country. I pray that doesn't happen.
Yeah, there's no comparison in scale (or in kind) here with IS/AQ. If the US want to do anything in Venezuela, they'll have to do it themselves.
And for the last few years the US and Turkey were occupying all the most important natural resources and fertile land.
Did anyone get played as bad as the YPG in that war? Kept around by the Amerikkkans to do their dirty work of fragmenting Syria further, then the moment they were no longer needed the ally of their yankee masters (Turkey) moved in.
When will "leftists" learn that yankees are not their friends?
it became an excuse for turkey to move into Kurdistan too. I wonder what YPG could've done instead, what can we learn?
Great Article from Middle East Critique Journal: North and East Syria (Rojava): Liberatory Project or US Proxy?
What to make of the AANES? While democratic confederalism retains theoretical potential as an alternative governance model, this potential remains structurally constrained by material integration into imperial accumulation circuits. With Damascus now incorporated into US–Israeli–Gulf networks through HTS rule, the AANES faces a choice not between Washington and an independent Syria, but between different forms of subordination. The SDF–HTS agreement reached on March 10, 2025, demonstrates this accommodation to the US-backed Damascus government (Rojava Information Center Citation2025). This structural realignment is evident in concrete resource flows: as of February 2025, the SDF delivers 150,000 barrels of crude oil and 1 million cubic meters of gas daily to the HTS-controlled government while having withheld the same resources from the Syrian state as the SAR faced brutal US sanctions (Al-Mayadeen Citation2025).”
...
the criterion for what constitutes liberation must be grounded not in ideological proclamations but in material alignment. A movement’s emancipatory potential is determined not by its political commitments or visionary rhetoric alone, but by whether it materially challenges or reproduces US imperialism on a world scale.
While democratic confederalism’s ideological pillars of jineolojî, social ecology, and direct democracy should be championed, the AANES’s structural integration into US-led imperial circuits fundamentally undermines their liberatory potential. These progressive ideals remain merely a drop in the bucket compared to the tidal wave of destruction unleashed by US-led imperialism, with which the AANES has become structurally aligned. Until genuine delinking occurs, the AANES cannot transcend its structural role in imperial fragmentation.
MoA posted a good Venezuela-related analysis today:
"The whole Trump South America policy is not about drugs or Venezuela but about U.S. control over the whole continent with the help of right-wing proxy leaders.
Meanwhile the U.S. military continues to strike random fisherman near Venezuela (archived) with drones and missiles.
[...]
I still very much doubt that Trump will order military strikes on Venezuela. Chances are high that any such operation would end in a quagmire. It would lessen the chances of any other policy success he might want to have."
https://www.moonofalabama.org/2025/11/trump-pardons-drug-smuggler-threatens-venezuela.html
I still very much doubt that Trump will order military strikes on Venezuela. Chances are high that any such operation would end in a quagmire. It would lessen the chances of any other policy success he might want to have.
I don't really get this, they're very much getting away with strikes on random civilians while posturing and threatening much worse. Unless they do a ground invasion, what risk to the US is there of a quagmire from hitting their mainland with missiles and bombs? Barring any hypersonic missiles that may have been snuck into Venezuela, the US unfortunately seems immune from any significant consequences here.
I think the risk is in Venezuela hitting them back somehow which would cause the US to want to escalate to save face. Not sure on Venezuelan capabilities but if they managed to shoot down anything bombing them or hit a carrier the US would need to escalate and an escalation process would lead to a long conflict
I've been thinking that worst case scenario, Venezuela might try an attack using several small speed boats in a similar fashion to what pirates might try in the red sea. How likely that could end in success is hard to know, it would probably end in a lot of dead people in the boats. They would also need to stage that covertly in a nearer island.
yeah they need to learn from Yemen
huh... what are all those US ships in the Caribbean even doing?
https://archive.ph/JJn1l
Second Russian Tanker Appears Off Venezuela After Seahorse’s Cat-and-Mouse With U.S. Navy
A second vessel tied to Russia’s shadow fleet has joined the sanctioned tanker Seahorse off the coast of Venezuela, days after the Seahorse was involved in a cat and mouse game with U.S. Navy forces, according to people familiar with the ship movements.
more
The newly arrived tanker, the Vasily Lanovoy, has previously been deployed to transport condensate linked to Russia’s sanctioned Arctic LNG 2 project – an operation already under heavy scrutiny from U.S. and European regulators. In this latest instance the vessel departed from the Baltic port of Ust-Luga on October 27 traveling across the Atlantic. It arrived at Venezuela’s oil loading complex at Puerto José on November 22. Its presence near the Seahorse in the Caribbean is raising renewed questions about how Russia’s vast network of opaque shipping assets is skirting international sanctions and maintaining energy flows through unconventional routes. Just two weeks ago Canada imposed sanctions on the Vasily Lanovoy following similar measures by the UK and the EU in September and October 2025. The vessel has repeatedly engaged in spoofing or disengaging its AIS signal.
The U.S. Navy’s encounter with the Seahorse earlier this month underscores the growing friction surrounding this clandestine segment of the global energy trade. American officials have not publicly detailed the nature of the standoff with the U.S. destroyer USS Stockdale, but analysts say the incident highlights escalating efforts by Washington to disrupt Russia’s sanctions-evading logistics. The arrival of the Vasily Lanovoy – a vessel with a well-documented history of conducting high-risk cargo operations – adds an additional layer of complexity. The vessel without an ice classification picked up several loads of condensate from the Arctic LNG 2 project between August and October 2024. The vessel disengaged its AIS transponder for parts of those journeys. Venezuelan waters have increasingly become a crossroads for ships with checkered histories, drawn by the country’s permissive regulatory environment and longstanding energy ties with Moscow.
For U.S. officials and sanction monitors, the latest development is another signal of Russia’s growing reliance on dark-fleet infrastructure—aging, poorly insured tankers operating with minimal transparency—to navigate tightening export restrictions. With China’s help the country recently engaged in the first shadow fleet ship-to-ship transfer of LNG off Malaysia’s coast.
international sanctions
I love how they call unilateral USA sanctions "international". none of that shit is UN approved

They also call this "not an empire"
And calling it "the shadow fleet" because those ships can't be insured internationally because all insurance companies obey US/EU sanctions, so they have to be insured by Russia. THE SHADOW FLEET!
“In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful
Hezbollah’s Message to His Holiness, the Supreme Pontiff of the Catholic Church, Pope Leo XIV
Your Holiness, The Supreme Pontiff of the Catholic Church, Pope Leo XIV — with utmost respect,
Greetings and peace be upon you,
To begin, we express our full welcome and deep appreciation for your honorable presence and your visit to Lebanon — this beautiful country, blessed by God with its unique geographic location and harmonious religious diversity. This diversity, embodied in a shared life and broad consensus, is essential to the stability of its political system and the security of its nation.
Your predecessor, Pope John Paul II, once declared that Lebanon is “not merely a nation, but a message.” Indeed, Lebanon — with its rich mosaic — represents a civilizational bridge between the followers of the two heavenly messages, Christianity and Islam, and among all religious, cultural, and secular traditions across the world.
When human beings are placed at the center of concern for all faiths — and even for secular ideological systems — one can truly hope for the possibility of achieving lasting peace and security.
We read in your guidance and messages a firm commitment to human rights and the imperative to respect and protect them. These rights, however, extend beyond the individual to the broader sphere of peoples and nations.
The conflicts taking place across the world today stem, in large part, from the refusal of some actors — leaders, parties, groups, or states — to acknowledge or respect the rights of others, whether due to differences in religion, race, language, or interests.
It is no secret that the erosion of respect for human rights by certain entities fuels greed, domination, and the use of force instead of justice.
The tragedy witnessed in Gaza over the past two years — and still ongoing — is the result of the Zionist occupiers stripping the Palestinian people of their rights to their land, homeland, and self-determination, as well as the international system’s failure to embrace justice as the basis for resolving the long-standing conflict between an indigenous people and an occupying force.
Similarly, the suffering of the Lebanese people — caused by the Zionist occupation of parts of our land and its continuous aggressions and threats to our security and stability — reflects the enemy’s ambition to control our waters, land, and gas resources, and to impose political, security, and expansionist conditions without limit.
There is no doubt that the Zionist occupation receives — regrettably — unconditional support from major powers that share its ambitions to dominate our region and exploit its resources, with no regard for the rights of our people.
What the “Israeli” enemy has committed in Gaza against the Palestinian people is an act of genocide; and what it continues to commit in Lebanon is an ongoing and condemned aggression.
We, in Hezbollah, seize the opportunity of your blessed visit to reiterate our commitment to shared coexistence, consensual democracy, internal security and stability, and the protection of national sovereignty. We stand alongside our army and our people in confronting any aggression or occupation targeting our land and our nation.
We also hold firmly to our legitimate right to reject foreign interference aimed at imposing tutelage on our country, undermining our national decision-making, and usurping the constitutional authority of our institutions.
If our religious conviction affirms that the followers of Jesus Christ — peace be upon him — are messengers of love, justice, and human dignity, then we rely on your principled stance in rejecting the oppression and aggression inflicted upon Lebanon by the Zionist invaders and their supporters.
This is the message we deliver to Your Holiness during this visit, in which you express your care, affection, and solidarity with all Lebanese. We wish you comfort and safety during your stay, praying to Almighty God to grant justice, security, and relief to the oppressed across the world.
With our sincerest regards,
#Military_Media”
I love flying planes long past their expected retirement! USA! USA!
https://archive.ph/GHJ17
USAF plan to fly C-5, C-17s even longer elicits concern
Service says it needs to hedge against delays to planned Next-Generation Airlift plane.
more
The Air Force aims to keep its aging C-5 and C-17 airlifters flying years longer than planned as it awaits a next-gen replacement, officials said in recently released documents. That’s alarming some former mobility leaders. A Nov. 19 solicitation memo says the C-5 Galaxy will fly until 2045 and the C-17 Globemaster until 2075**, longer than previously planned, to ensure that the Air Force has enough airlift capacity while it waits for the Next-Generation Airlift aircraft. NGAL is to reach production no earlier than 2038 and initial operating capacity three years after that. “To mitigate risks associated with acquisition delays, funding uncertainties, or technological challenges, the existing C-5M and C-17A fleets’ operational viability must be maintained until a fully capable replacement is fielded, which may require extending the service life and associated Military Type Certificate (MTC) of each platform,” the memo states.
The plan is to retire one C-5 as each new NGAL arrives, then do the same with the C-17s. But keeping some of the Air Force’s oldest transport airframes in the skies is already a major effort, former service officials told Defense One. Maintenance hurdles, mission-capability rates, and recent mishap stats add to the concerns. “Why would this approach to this old problem deliver a different result than what has already happened?” said Mike Minihan, who retired last year after leading Air Mobility Command. “Have we done the analysis to ensure that the capability that we're delivering with this upgrade is actually what the warfighter needs?” Minihan said he supports the Air Force’s efforts to field NGAL. (In May, he became an adviser to Radia, which aims to field the world’s largest cargo plane.) He also praised the memo’s acknowledgement that “uninterrupted inter-theater airlift capacity is paramount for global operations,” But Minihan said the service needs to prioritize its future airlift capabilities, not just modernizing aging aircraft. “I'm extremely worried about what I call the equilibrium. The equilibrium between the force that supports and the force that needs supporting, or the strike forces,” Minihan said. “So you're going to have fifth- and sixth-generation bombers and fighters, and you're still on generation-two airlifters and tankers.”
The C-5 entered service in 1970. After the AIr Force concluded in 2004 that the Galaxy still had decades of life, the remaining 52 airframes were re-engined and upgraded between 2006 and 2018. But last year, the type managed only a 48 percent mission-capable rate, thanks to maintenance and supply-chain problems that kept some airframes in the depot for 900 days. The Air Force Life Cycle Management even started a campaign, “Drive to 55.” to boost that rate to 55 percent. Minihan has publicly argued that the Air Force should sell its C-5s to private companies, then charter them from time to time, as a way to “relieve the C-17.” The C-17, which entered service in 1995, has a more reliable mission-capable rate of 75 percent. But in the past four years, Globemasters have been involved in 21 class-A mishaps—the deadliest and costliest incidents—more than any of the military’s most-used planes.
Jessica Ruttenber, a former Air Force pilot and program manager who oversaw the C-5 and C-17 portfolios, said she was unsurprised by the service’s call to extend the life of the two transports, but said the cost of doing so would continue to be high. “It’s a grandfather jet, so it doesn’t surprise me one bit,” Ruttenber said. “The thing that concerns me for the C-5 and the C-17…is the maintenance cost and the upkeep.” Responses to the NGAL solicitation are due in about two months, and the analysis of alternatives is to take place in 2027, the memo said.
As part of the Brandon-ization of America, in addition to every politician now being an ancient husk, we will also make sure that every vehicle in use by the military is ancient too! Every man a Brandon, every plane a Brandon, every ship a Brandon!
Ngl I dont see what is absolutely necessary about replacing these airframes with a new design. Their age is some concern, though that's fixable with airframe rebuilds or purchasing replacements of the same model.
Is there really some shiny gadget or widget that can't be retrofitted to the existing design? Does the US need a higher cargo lift capacity? Would increased capacity not just inflate the weight of systems to meet it like adding lanes to a highway?
If anything, we've seen how newer shit is expensive, unreliable, and reliant on strategic resources/technologies that China can deny relatively easily.
New telegram for DPRK info. I think most of it is kcna reposts but the admin also intends to write original posts on the DPRK.
https://t.me/PyongyangNews/100
“KCNA: New Houses Built at Vegetable Farms in Pyongyang.
New houses have been built at the Ryokpho Vegetable Farm in Ryokpho District and the Oryu Vegetable Farm in Sadong District, the historic places associated with the leadership exploits of the Workers' Party of Korea, in Pyongyang Municipality.
The modern houses demonstrating the validity and vitality of the programme for the rural revolution in the new era picture the future of the countryside thriving day by day along with a new life and civilization.
Present at the ceremonies of moving into new houses held on the spots were officials of the Party and power organs, builders and agricultural workers in Pyongyang Municipality and Ryokpho and Sadong districts.”




In Canadian Indigenous news, here is a story about the relationship between the Tahltan Central Government (TCG) and Skeena resources, owners of the Eskay Creek mining project, which is on Tahltan land in northern BC. This article is not written with a Marxist lense, but it is not hard to see the material forces at work. I encourage reading the whole thing.
As Canada's role in the future world economy is likely to be driven by the resource sector, I believe these issues are worth understanding for news heads. This is where the rubber meets the road with respect to the political economy of Indigenous decision making. Canada is by far the most obvious location for friendshoring to serve American resource needs, and the vast majority of the Canadian resource sector falls under Indigenous consultation obligations.
Questions are being raised inside a B.C. First Nation after $10,000 was offered to each member ahead of a crucial vote on the future of a major gold mine.
Unlike other mines, Eskay Creek is subject to Canada’s first ever consent-based decision-making agreement with a First Nation. Signed in 2022 between the province and the Tahltan Central Government, the agreement explicitly states the project cannot proceed without the nation’s free, prior and informed consent.
The nation's leadership stoked some members’ concerns even further when, on Nov. 20, it said it had negotiated a $40-million “upfront payment” that would be distributed in $10,000 payments to eligible individuals.
The article goes on to describe different financial and ownership relationships between parties as well as potential conflict of interest.
TCG has a lot of capacity compared to most First Nations governments in BC and are located in a highly desirable area for resource extraction, colloquially known as the Golden Triangle. TCG has a strong track record of negotiating agreements with resource extraction companies and the province which give them an unprecedented amount of say in project development, and implementing UNDRIP.
Nisga'a Lisims Government, home of the first modern BC treaty from 2000 (The Nisga'a Final Agreement) and benefactor/partner in the Ksi Lisims gas terminal project is also in the same general area. See my previous post on Ksi Lisims from a few months ago.
One of the key constraints to understand is the size of First Nations governments relative to the economic size of the projects in question. TCG is about 3000 people and Eskay alone is a several billion dollar project, which is one of several major mines in the territory, with more in development. The possibility for regulatory capture increases in these circumstances. It's the regulatory equivalent of the old joke that if you owe the someone a thousand dollars you've got a problem, if you owe someone a million dollars, they've got a problem. This issue is common to anytime a large industry player comes to a small jurisdiction (think of the sway Walmart has in a small town).
There are also limits to what specialized technical expertise exists in a community of 3000. There is tremendous traditional knowledge in First Nations communities, but this experience does not extend to the detailed design and operation of large open pit mines, tailings dams, pipelines, or shipping terminals. It's easy to dunk on technocracy, but the reality is that if a community decision is made to support resource development in a Nation's territory and to use the economic activity associated to support the Nation's community, then there is need for people with a high degree of training to understand, regulate, and make decisions related to these complex resource projects. That kind of person ideally comes from the community itself, but there is a limited local workforce to draw from, especially Indigenous communities that have suffered from genocide, residential schools, poverty etc. in living memory.
The Canadian legal system including the Indian Act is structured to support assimilation. It does so more softly than it did 100 years ago and there is less focus on cultural assimilation, but incentives for economic assimilation are just as strong as ever in a country founded to be hewers of wood and drawers of water.