AlHouthi4President

joined 1 year ago
[–] AlHouthi4President@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago

One of greatest film of all time.

Also noteworthy that during the film (and history) almost all the leadership of resistance was martyred. And yet they still won.

[–] AlHouthi4President@lemmy.ml 19 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Iran has essentially sieged the carriers. Incredible.

Soon the stormtrooper childkillers will be eating each other 😁

[–] AlHouthi4President@lemmy.ml 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)
[–] AlHouthi4President@lemmy.ml 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

What happened to the people like "Iran is so weak why arent they attacking harder right now. I can't believe they are talking about more negotiations. I am smarter than IRGC because I just learned geography of Iran 18 months ago. Iran should be sinking the US carriers and if they do ill convert to Shia islam but id they dont they are cucks."

[–] AlHouthi4President@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For someone that talks about ID pol so much, to say that one’s identity as a minority is political in and of itself is just, blegh. Basically indistinguishable from right-wing talking points.

Yeah... Just another supremacist but because hes "antizionist Jew" he gets a free pass i guess. One of "the good ones."

Someone shared this with me:

Norman Finkelstein is a white supremacist who has a complex where he must seem smarter than palestinians. When jewish zionists blacklisted him from universities, he blamed arab academics and “woke cancel culture” for his explusion. When discussing resistance heroes, he constantly focuses on how they read the Quran when he himself has clearly not read their work, see his disparagment of al-Rantisi below.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/XRNW6OmZkPs

Finkelshit basically thinks Palestinians are too stupid to have a real national liberation project, that the resistance is a losing bet and also incompetent.

What a racist pig.

[–] AlHouthi4President@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I'm very over the racist left glorifying of Norman Finkelshit

From Mujamma Haraket

In his most recent appearance on the “India and Global Left” program, Norman Finkelstein avers that Yahya Sinwar and the Hamas leaders in Gaza who undertook Tufan al-Aqsa were undertaking an impulsive “gamble” rather than a strategic operation. When the interviewer (correctly) observes that there are reasons to believe that the short-term goal was to free prisoners and the long-term objective was to halt regional normalization while galvanizing the Palestine issue globally, Finkelstein vehemently disagrees. Were Finkelstein to familiarize himself with the “Our Narrative” documents produced by Hamas or consider the various testimonies where figures ranging from Mahmoud Mardawi to Jasser al-Barghouti elaborated on Sinwar et al.’s modus operandi, perhaps he would not be so dismissive.

Yet Finkelstein then insists that “like Nat Turner, who had only read the Bible” (a claim that is itself contravened by Christopher Tomlins’s recent scholarship on Turner), Sinwar was unlearned—and had, following the 2011 Shalit prisoner exchange which precipitated his return to the besieged Gaza Strip, but “gone from one prison to another”. According to Finkelstein, Sinwar was thus constitutionally incapable of political prudence, acting from rash and extruding compulsions alone. It is rather mystifying that someone who prides themselves on their granular research (and, it should be noted, has undoubtedly assiduously assayed the 2010 Mavi Marmara case and various human rights reports) is unaware of Sinwar’s well-established and arrayed literary record—as a writer, reader, and translator.

Furthermore, Finkelstein argues that it is folly to focus on the resistance, as this merely bolsters the occupation’s misbegotten narrative that Tufan al-Aqsa was a war rather than a genocide. Finkelstein beseeches the interviewer: “Can you name me a single battle? You can’t as there were none.” However—and putting aside the issue that the categories of “wars” and “genocides” do not definitionally exclude one another (e.g., the 1994 Tutsi genocide occurred amidst a war)—a cursory review of the Palestinian resistance’s witness accounts is punctuated by references to the “Battle of Khan Younis” (Dec. 2023 - April 2024), what Abu Obeida called the “Battle of Rafah” (May-August 2024), and the “Battle of Shujaʿiyya” (Dec. 2023), to name but a few. These were, of course, conducted as guerrilla rather than conventional military battles. But to take the resistance’s operational and political history seriously neither entreats minimization of the occupation’s “dolus specialis” (genocidal intent) nor bestows parity upon the two parties.

I dont wanna a get into a whole discourse with the news mega but im just gonna drop here that Elias Rodriguez did nothing wrong and the same people who said he did "adventurism" are glorifying Luigi. I guess its one of those "okay not okay" memes or something.

[–] AlHouthi4President@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

We saw a mosque built through donations by a merchant, and the minaret alone cost seven million riyals ­ I have no idea how much the mosque itself cost, but the minaret was seven million! That amount could do a lot of good work in the area of orienting people towards the religion of Allah, towards the noble Quran and in educating them according to it, or in confronting the enemy or providing the means to do so.

We see that even a small contribution in the area in which we are working can go a long way; how would it be if there were a contribution of seven million riyals? This minaret, what will it do? … however, when you build a human being on the basis of the Quran isn’t he someone who is capable of shooting at America? Is it possible for the minaret to some day turn into a rocket that will be launched and destroy a city among the cities of unbelief (al-kufr)? No … you did not build a human being, you did not build ‘minarets’ ­ the true minaret is the human being whom you build on the basis of the Quran and who builds and constructs himself according to the guidance of Allah where his success is on the basis of the Quran.

-Shaheed Hussein Badr al Din al Houthi

[–] AlHouthi4President@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 days ago

Right.

If we start from the position that USAmerica is fundamentally good but just needs to fix a few flaws, then of course promoting diversity is a possible political strategy.

If we start from the position that the most important strategic political requirement for socialism–or even the continued existence of our species for that matter--is expedient dissolution of the United States as a political and economic entity, then how does that change the political strategy?

I wonder if anyone is genuinely grappling with this.

[–] AlHouthi4President@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

I'm confused then. This happened over 13 years ago and was with different Malian government and under significantly different circumstances.

The recent fallout was because Algeria shot down a Malian drone??

[–] AlHouthi4President@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago

Big claim. Source needed especially when accusing the only remaining anti-imperialist semi-sovereign Arab country of chauvanism.

 
 
 

From author's telegram

The world’s eyes are on Lionel Messi, as Argentina will face Spain in the World Cup Final. The diminutive superstar has gained a massive following across the planet, not least in Israel, thanks to his numerous business and security connections with the Apartheid State. From being the face of an Israeli A.I. company led and run by Israeli spies, entrusting his private security to a team of Israel secret agents, I explore the reasons why Benjamin Netanyahu considers him to be his favorite football player.

 

Academic article reveals statistical evidence for what we already knew. Zionist cancer times its attacks to coincide with major sporting events. I used scihub.ru to look through it.

I'm sure the world cup has nothing to do with the timing of largest attacks on Lebanon and Iran since April.

Abstract

Politicians may strategically time unpopular measures to coincide with newsworthy events that distract the media and the public. We test this hypothesis in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. We find that Israeli attacks are more likely to occur when US news on the following day is dominated by important predictable events. Strategic timing applies to attacks that bear risk of civilian casualties and are not too costly to postpone. Content analysis suggests that Israel’s strategy aims at minimizing next-day coverage, which is especially charged with negative emotional content. Palestinian attacks do not appear to be timed to US news.

 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/49649273

This is what I see in the procession of diplomats & world leaders to the funeral. The part of the world that is growing is mostly there, the part of the world that is dying, mostly not. Which do you prefer?

[2026-07-04] Dhaka Papers

Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei was not simply the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran. He became a global symbol of resistance against imperialism, colonial domination and foreign aggression. His voice reached far beyond the borders of Iran and resonated throughout Asia, Africa and Latin America.

The General Secretary of the Communist Party of Kenya (Marxist), Booker Omole, has issued a lengthy political statement of condolence following the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei. Titled “Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei’s Legacy Will Outlive US Imperialism,” the statement presents the party’s perspective on Khamenei’s political legacy, his anti-imperialist stance, the question of Palestine, recent developments in West Asia, and various issues in international politics. For the readers of Dhaka Papers, the statement is published below in its entirety and without alteration.

The statement:

The Central Committee of the Communist Party Marxist Kenya extends its deepest condolences to the people of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the family of Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, and all progressive, anti imperialist and freedom loving peoples across the world as they bid farewell to one of the defining political figures of our time.

His passing comes at a decisive moment in world history. The imperialist system is entering a deeper period of crisis. The contradictions of global capitalism continue to sharpen. The peoples of Asia, Africa and Latin America are asserting their sovereign right to determine their own future, while the unipolar order imposed by United States imperialism faces mounting resistance across the globe. It is within this historical context that the life and legacy of Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei must be understood.

Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei was not simply the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran. He became a global symbol of resistance against imperialism, colonial domination and foreign aggression. His voice reached far beyond the borders of Iran and resonated throughout Asia, Africa and Latin America. To countless oppressed peoples, he represented steadfastness in the face of overwhelming pressure and unwavering commitment to national sovereignty.

He was a true friend of the oppressed world. At a time when many governments capitulated before imperialist intimidation, Ayatollah Khamenei stood firm. His political legacy cannot be confined within the borders of Iran nor reduced merely to his religious office. He emerged as one of the foremost voices of the Global South’s resistance against imperialist hegemony, inspiring nations to defend their dignity, independence and sovereign right to determine their own future.

The Communist Party Marxist Kenya is a Marxist Leninist party. We do not share Ayatollah Khamenei’s religious worldview, nor do we approach society from the standpoint of political theology. Yet revolutionary honesty demands that we recognise those who consistently stood against imperialism and defended the sovereignty of oppressed nations. Our admiration for Ayatollah Khamenei was never based upon religion. It was based upon his uncompromising opposition to imperialism, Zionism, colonial domination and the arrogance of the powerful states that continue to exploit the peoples of the world.

This distinction is politically important. Marxism Leninism and the political philosophy of the Islamic Republic arise from different ideological traditions and rest upon different philosophical foundations. Our solidarity therefore does not arise from agreement on every question of philosophy, religion or social organisation. It arises from a concrete analysis of the principal contradiction confronting oppressed nations in the present epoch. Wherever peoples resist imperialist domination, defend their sovereignty and oppose colonial aggression, objective conditions create the possibility for common struggle despite ideological differences. This reflects not tactical convenience but the dialectics of the international anti imperialist movement.

Throughout decades of sanctions, threats, sabotage, assassinations and relentless propaganda, the United States and its allies sought to isolate and demonise him. Yet no campaign by the imperialist powers succeeded in separating him from the millions who regarded him as a principled defender of national independence. His moral and political authority among many oppressed peoples endured because it rested upon consistency rather than expediency.

One of the defining features of his international legacy was his unwavering position on Palestine. Long before it became widely acknowledged in international discourse, Ayatollah Khamenei consistently maintained that the Palestinian question was fundamentally one of settler colonialism, occupation and the denial of an entire people’s right to self determination. His steadfast support for the Palestinian people made him a source of hope for millions who continue to resist colonial domination and dispossession.

For decades, while many governments normalized relations with the Zionist entity or remained silent before the crimes committed against the Palestinian people, Ayatollah Khamenei insisted that Palestine remained the central question of justice in West Asia. He understood that the struggle of Palestine was not an isolated national question but one expression of the wider struggle against colonial domination, racial oppression and imperialist intervention. In doing so, he gave political expression to the aspirations of millions across the Global South who refused to accept the legitimacy of occupation and apartheid.

His words continue to inspire those who refuse to surrender before imperialist domination.

“Resistance is the only way that can reduce the enemy’s acts of aggression.”

“The Iranian nation has shown that it will never surrender to bullying and coercion.”

These were not merely political slogans. They reflected a lifetime of commitment to the principle that no people should bow before foreign domination regardless of the balance of military power.

As Marxist Leninists, we know that history advances through the struggle of peoples against oppression. While our philosophical foundations differ, we also recognize that objective contradictions often unite diverse political forces against a common enemy. The international anti imperialist movement has never been ideologically uniform. Throughout history it has brought together workers, peasants, national liberation movements, progressive governments and patriotic forces whose immediate unity arose from the necessity of defeating colonialism and imperial domination. In that historic struggle against imperialism, Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei occupied an important place.

The Dialectics of Imperial Decline

Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei’s political thought was distinguished by his ability to analyses power not as something static but as something shaped by contradiction. In one of his notable observations, he argued that the extensive network of United States military installations in West Asia would ultimately become a source of weakness rather than strength for the United States. This was not merely a military assessment. It reflected a dialectical understanding that every apparent strength carries within itself contradictions that can, under changing conditions, become a source of vulnerability.

The recent military confrontation in West Asia has once again brought this proposition into sharp focus. Rather than guaranteeing stability or unquestioned dominance, the extensive military footprint of the United States has itself become deeply entangled in the region’s escalating contradictions, exposing its forces and strategic assets to heightened risks while further intensifying anti imperialist sentiment across the region. From a dialectical standpoint, this illustrates that imperial expansion inevitably generates the very conditions that undermine its own permanence.

The recent war demonstrated once more that imperialism possesses enormous destructive power but diminishing political legitimacy. Military superiority can destroy cities, assassinate leaders and devastate infrastructure, but it cannot manufacture consent among peoples determined to defend their sovereignty. This contradiction between overwhelming military force and declining political legitimacy increasingly defines the present stage of imperialism.

Marxists recognize this as a fundamental law of historical development. Every social system contains internal contradictions that drive its transformation. Capitalism itself generated monopoly. Monopoly generated imperialism. Imperialism has generated a world increasingly divided between oppressor and oppressed nations while simultaneously producing the conditions for its own historical negation. In this respect, Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei demonstrated an important capacity for dialectical analysis by recognizing that imperial overextension can transform strategic assets into strategic liabilities. Whether expressed through the language of revolutionary theory or through his own political tradition, his analysis converged with a central insight of dialectical materialism that quantitative expansion, when pushed beyond its limits, gives rise to qualitative change.

Lenin demonstrated that imperialism represents the highest stage of capitalism, characterized by monopoly, the domination of finance capital, the export of capital, the division of the world among monopolies and the territorial partition of the globe among the great powers. These characteristics are not temporary policies. They arise from the objective laws governing monopoly capitalism itself. Imperialism therefore cannot abandon aggression without ceasing to be imperialism. War, sanctions, regime change operations, military encirclement and economic coercion are not accidents of policy. They are structural expressions of the imperialist system.

The strategic assessments advanced by Ayatollah Khamenei repeatedly exposed these same contradictions as they unfolded within the concrete realities of West Asia. His analysis recognized that imperialism cannot indefinitely sustain global domination because the very methods through which it seeks to preserve its supremacy deepen the contradictions that undermine it. Every military intervention creates new resistance. Every sanction accelerates the search for alternative economic arrangements. Every attempt to isolate sovereign nations encourages new forms of international cooperation outside imperialist control. Thus the mechanisms of domination increasingly become the mechanisms through which imperialism accelerates its own historical decline.

The contradictions of imperialism are also expressed through the law of uneven development. Lenin demonstrated that capitalist development proceeds unevenly, producing continual shifts in the balance of economic, political and military power. No imperialist order remains permanently stable because the very dynamics of monopoly capitalism generate new centers of production, new political alignments and new forms of resistance. The contemporary world increasingly reflects this reality. The unipolar moment that followed the collapse of the Soviet Union is steadily giving way to a more complex international order in which the peoples and nations of the Global South are asserting a greater degree of political and economic independence.

Within this changing historical landscape, the Islamic Republic of Iran emerged as one of the principal centers of resistance against imperialist domination in West Asia. Despite decades of sanctions, military threats, sabotage, assassinations and diplomatic isolation, Iran refused to surrender its sovereignty or abandon its support for the Palestinian people and other oppressed nations. This demonstrated that the capacity of imperialism to dictate the course of history is neither absolute nor irreversible. Every act of coercion generated new contradictions. Every attempt at isolation strengthened new forms of cooperation among states seeking greater strategic autonomy. Every military escalation exposed the declining ability of imperialism to impose unquestioned political authority.

The emergence of a more multipolar international order should therefore not be understood as the disappearance of imperialism. United States imperialism remains the principal aggressive force in the contemporary world and continues to possess immense military, financial, technological and ideological power. Yet Marxism teaches that historical strength must never be confused with historical permanence. The growing crisis of imperialism is measured not only by economic indicators or military expenditure but also by its diminishing capacity to secure political legitimacy, its increasing reliance upon coercion, the sharpening rivalry among imperialist powers themselves and the growing confidence of oppressed peoples to determine their own destinies. These are not isolated developments. They are expressions of a historical transition driven by contradictions that no ruling class can permanently suppress.

It is within this broader movement of history that Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei’s political legacy should be situated. Whatever differences exist between Marxists and the ideological foundations of the Islamic Republic, his consistent opposition to imperialist domination formed part of the wider international struggle through which oppressed nations continue to reshape the global balance of forces. His political life became one expression of a larger historical tendency in which the era of uncontested imperial hegemony is steadily giving way to an era of intensified resistance, national sovereignty and the growing assertion of the peoples of Asia, Africa and Latin America.

For the Communist Party Marxist Kenya, the lessons of the recent war extend far beyond military developments. They confirm once again that no imperial power, however formidable its arsenal, can indefinitely impose its will upon peoples determined to defend their sovereignty. Imperialism may delay history through violence, but it cannot arrest history altogether. The contradictions that define the imperialist epoch continue to deepen, while the capacity of oppressed peoples to organize, resist and shape the future continues to expand. History therefore remains on the side of those who struggle for liberation rather than domination.

History Will Deliver Its Verdict

History teaches that no empire is eternal. Every imperial order, however mighty it may appear, carries within itself the contradictions that ultimately produce its decline. Empires rise. Empires expand. Empires imagine themselves invincible. Yet the same contradictions that fuel their expansion eventually become the conditions of their decay. The oppressed endure, organize and struggle until they transform history in their favor.

Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei understood that genuine independence cannot be granted by imperialism. It must be defended through steadfastness, sacrifice and the confidence of a people determined to shape their own destiny. His unwavering defense of national sovereignty, his uncompromising solidarity with the Palestinian people and his consistent opposition to imperialist aggression have secured him a place among the enduring figures of the international anti imperialist movement.

Military aggression may destroy infrastructure. Economic sanctions may inflict suffering. Assassinations may remove individual leaders. Propaganda may distort reality.

Yet none of these can extinguish ideas that have taken root among millions of oppressed people.

Individuals die.

Ideas endure.

The principles for which Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei stood cannot be buried by bombs, sanctions, siege or threats because they have become part of the collective political consciousness of peoples struggling against domination. Once an idea is embraced by the masses and translated into organized struggle, it acquires a historical force that no army can permanently defeat.

The Communist Party Marxist Kenya believes that Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei’s political legacy will continue to inspire future generations across Asia, Africa, Latin America and every part of the world where peoples continue to resist imperialism, colonialism, Zionism and national oppression. His legacy now belongs not only to Iran but also to the broader history of humanity’s struggle for sovereignty, dignity and liberation.

History remembers leaders not simply because they occupied high office, commanded armies or exercised state power. It remembers those who, in decisive moments, gave political expression to the aspirations of their people and stood firm when surrender appeared easier than resistance. Whether future generations agree with every aspect of Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei’s political philosophy is a question history itself will continue to examine. What cannot be denied is that he became one of the defining symbols of resistance to imperial domination during the opening decades of the twenty first century.

The struggle against imperialism has never depended upon one individual. It began long before Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei and it will continue long after all of today’s leaders have passed into history. The movement of history is driven not by great personalities alone but by the organized activity of millions of workers, peasants, youth, women, intellectuals and oppressed nations determined to secure their liberation. It is the masses who ultimately make history, and it is through their struggles that every empire is brought to an end.

For this reason, mourning must never become political resignation. The greatest tribute that can be paid to those who resisted imperialism is not simply to remember them but to continue the struggle to which they devoted their lives. Every generation inherits unfinished tasks from those who came before it. Our generation has inherited the task of defeating imperialism, ending colonial domination, securing the liberation of Palestine, defending national sovereignty and advancing a world founded upon justice, equality, peace and genuine international solidarity.

History will deliver its own verdict.

Empires will decline.

Nations will liberate themselves.

The peoples of the world will continue to resist.

Palestine will be free.

Imperialism will be defeated.

In that historical process, the legacy of Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei will outlive United States imperialism because ideas rooted in the aspirations of oppressed peoples cannot be destroyed by force. States may wage war against nations. Armies may occupy territories. Economies may be subjected to sanctions. Leaders may pass away. But no power can permanently extinguish a people determined to be free.

Today we stand in solidarity with the people of Iran during this period of mourning. We honor a leader who refused to kneel before imperialism, who remained steadfast in defense of Palestine, who inspired millions to believe that sovereignty is worth defending and that resistance against domination is both legitimate and necessary.

May the people of Iran continue to defend their independence.

May the Palestinian people achieve complete national liberation.

May the peoples of the world deepen their unity against imperialism.

Long live international solidarity.

Long live the struggle against imperialism.

Long live the liberation of Palestine.

Issued by the General Secretary, Central Organizing Committee

Communist Party Marxist Kenya

4 July 2026

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/49649273

This is what I see in the procession of diplomats & world leaders to the funeral. The part of the world that is growing is mostly there, the part of the world that is dying, mostly not. Which do you prefer?

[2026-07-04] Dhaka Papers

Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei was not simply the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran. He became a global symbol of resistance against imperialism, colonial domination and foreign aggression. His voice reached far beyond the borders of Iran and resonated throughout Asia, Africa and Latin America.

The General Secretary of the Communist Party of Kenya (Marxist), Booker Omole, has issued a lengthy political statement of condolence following the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei. Titled “Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei’s Legacy Will Outlive US Imperialism,” the statement presents the party’s perspective on Khamenei’s political legacy, his anti-imperialist stance, the question of Palestine, recent developments in West Asia, and various issues in international politics. For the readers of Dhaka Papers, the statement is published below in its entirety and without alteration.

The statement:

The Central Committee of the Communist Party Marxist Kenya extends its deepest condolences to the people of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the family of Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, and all progressive, anti imperialist and freedom loving peoples across the world as they bid farewell to one of the defining political figures of our time.

His passing comes at a decisive moment in world history. The imperialist system is entering a deeper period of crisis. The contradictions of global capitalism continue to sharpen. The peoples of Asia, Africa and Latin America are asserting their sovereign right to determine their own future, while the unipolar order imposed by United States imperialism faces mounting resistance across the globe. It is within this historical context that the life and legacy of Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei must be understood.

Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei was not simply the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran. He became a global symbol of resistance against imperialism, colonial domination and foreign aggression. His voice reached far beyond the borders of Iran and resonated throughout Asia, Africa and Latin America. To countless oppressed peoples, he represented steadfastness in the face of overwhelming pressure and unwavering commitment to national sovereignty.

He was a true friend of the oppressed world. At a time when many governments capitulated before imperialist intimidation, Ayatollah Khamenei stood firm. His political legacy cannot be confined within the borders of Iran nor reduced merely to his religious office. He emerged as one of the foremost voices of the Global South’s resistance against imperialist hegemony, inspiring nations to defend their dignity, independence and sovereign right to determine their own future.

The Communist Party Marxist Kenya is a Marxist Leninist party. We do not share Ayatollah Khamenei’s religious worldview, nor do we approach society from the standpoint of political theology. Yet revolutionary honesty demands that we recognise those who consistently stood against imperialism and defended the sovereignty of oppressed nations. Our admiration for Ayatollah Khamenei was never based upon religion. It was based upon his uncompromising opposition to imperialism, Zionism, colonial domination and the arrogance of the powerful states that continue to exploit the peoples of the world.

This distinction is politically important. Marxism Leninism and the political philosophy of the Islamic Republic arise from different ideological traditions and rest upon different philosophical foundations. Our solidarity therefore does not arise from agreement on every question of philosophy, religion or social organisation. It arises from a concrete analysis of the principal contradiction confronting oppressed nations in the present epoch. Wherever peoples resist imperialist domination, defend their sovereignty and oppose colonial aggression, objective conditions create the possibility for common struggle despite ideological differences. This reflects not tactical convenience but the dialectics of the international anti imperialist movement.

Throughout decades of sanctions, threats, sabotage, assassinations and relentless propaganda, the United States and its allies sought to isolate and demonise him. Yet no campaign by the imperialist powers succeeded in separating him from the millions who regarded him as a principled defender of national independence. His moral and political authority among many oppressed peoples endured because it rested upon consistency rather than expediency.

One of the defining features of his international legacy was his unwavering position on Palestine. Long before it became widely acknowledged in international discourse, Ayatollah Khamenei consistently maintained that the Palestinian question was fundamentally one of settler colonialism, occupation and the denial of an entire people’s right to self determination. His steadfast support for the Palestinian people made him a source of hope for millions who continue to resist colonial domination and dispossession.

For decades, while many governments normalized relations with the Zionist entity or remained silent before the crimes committed against the Palestinian people, Ayatollah Khamenei insisted that Palestine remained the central question of justice in West Asia. He understood that the struggle of Palestine was not an isolated national question but one expression of the wider struggle against colonial domination, racial oppression and imperialist intervention. In doing so, he gave political expression to the aspirations of millions across the Global South who refused to accept the legitimacy of occupation and apartheid.

His words continue to inspire those who refuse to surrender before imperialist domination.

“Resistance is the only way that can reduce the enemy’s acts of aggression.”

“The Iranian nation has shown that it will never surrender to bullying and coercion.”

These were not merely political slogans. They reflected a lifetime of commitment to the principle that no people should bow before foreign domination regardless of the balance of military power.

As Marxist Leninists, we know that history advances through the struggle of peoples against oppression. While our philosophical foundations differ, we also recognize that objective contradictions often unite diverse political forces against a common enemy. The international anti imperialist movement has never been ideologically uniform. Throughout history it has brought together workers, peasants, national liberation movements, progressive governments and patriotic forces whose immediate unity arose from the necessity of defeating colonialism and imperial domination. In that historic struggle against imperialism, Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei occupied an important place.

The Dialectics of Imperial Decline

Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei’s political thought was distinguished by his ability to analyses power not as something static but as something shaped by contradiction. In one of his notable observations, he argued that the extensive network of United States military installations in West Asia would ultimately become a source of weakness rather than strength for the United States. This was not merely a military assessment. It reflected a dialectical understanding that every apparent strength carries within itself contradictions that can, under changing conditions, become a source of vulnerability.

The recent military confrontation in West Asia has once again brought this proposition into sharp focus. Rather than guaranteeing stability or unquestioned dominance, the extensive military footprint of the United States has itself become deeply entangled in the region’s escalating contradictions, exposing its forces and strategic assets to heightened risks while further intensifying anti imperialist sentiment across the region. From a dialectical standpoint, this illustrates that imperial expansion inevitably generates the very conditions that undermine its own permanence.

The recent war demonstrated once more that imperialism possesses enormous destructive power but diminishing political legitimacy. Military superiority can destroy cities, assassinate leaders and devastate infrastructure, but it cannot manufacture consent among peoples determined to defend their sovereignty. This contradiction between overwhelming military force and declining political legitimacy increasingly defines the present stage of imperialism.

Marxists recognize this as a fundamental law of historical development. Every social system contains internal contradictions that drive its transformation. Capitalism itself generated monopoly. Monopoly generated imperialism. Imperialism has generated a world increasingly divided between oppressor and oppressed nations while simultaneously producing the conditions for its own historical negation. In this respect, Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei demonstrated an important capacity for dialectical analysis by recognizing that imperial overextension can transform strategic assets into strategic liabilities. Whether expressed through the language of revolutionary theory or through his own political tradition, his analysis converged with a central insight of dialectical materialism that quantitative expansion, when pushed beyond its limits, gives rise to qualitative change.

Lenin demonstrated that imperialism represents the highest stage of capitalism, characterized by monopoly, the domination of finance capital, the export of capital, the division of the world among monopolies and the territorial partition of the globe among the great powers. These characteristics are not temporary policies. They arise from the objective laws governing monopoly capitalism itself. Imperialism therefore cannot abandon aggression without ceasing to be imperialism. War, sanctions, regime change operations, military encirclement and economic coercion are not accidents of policy. They are structural expressions of the imperialist system.

The strategic assessments advanced by Ayatollah Khamenei repeatedly exposed these same contradictions as they unfolded within the concrete realities of West Asia. His analysis recognized that imperialism cannot indefinitely sustain global domination because the very methods through which it seeks to preserve its supremacy deepen the contradictions that undermine it. Every military intervention creates new resistance. Every sanction accelerates the search for alternative economic arrangements. Every attempt to isolate sovereign nations encourages new forms of international cooperation outside imperialist control. Thus the mechanisms of domination increasingly become the mechanisms through which imperialism accelerates its own historical decline.

The contradictions of imperialism are also expressed through the law of uneven development. Lenin demonstrated that capitalist development proceeds unevenly, producing continual shifts in the balance of economic, political and military power. No imperialist order remains permanently stable because the very dynamics of monopoly capitalism generate new centers of production, new political alignments and new forms of resistance. The contemporary world increasingly reflects this reality. The unipolar moment that followed the collapse of the Soviet Union is steadily giving way to a more complex international order in which the peoples and nations of the Global South are asserting a greater degree of political and economic independence.

Within this changing historical landscape, the Islamic Republic of Iran emerged as one of the principal centers of resistance against imperialist domination in West Asia. Despite decades of sanctions, military threats, sabotage, assassinations and diplomatic isolation, Iran refused to surrender its sovereignty or abandon its support for the Palestinian people and other oppressed nations. This demonstrated that the capacity of imperialism to dictate the course of history is neither absolute nor irreversible. Every act of coercion generated new contradictions. Every attempt at isolation strengthened new forms of cooperation among states seeking greater strategic autonomy. Every military escalation exposed the declining ability of imperialism to impose unquestioned political authority.

The emergence of a more multipolar international order should therefore not be understood as the disappearance of imperialism. United States imperialism remains the principal aggressive force in the contemporary world and continues to possess immense military, financial, technological and ideological power. Yet Marxism teaches that historical strength must never be confused with historical permanence. The growing crisis of imperialism is measured not only by economic indicators or military expenditure but also by its diminishing capacity to secure political legitimacy, its increasing reliance upon coercion, the sharpening rivalry among imperialist powers themselves and the growing confidence of oppressed peoples to determine their own destinies. These are not isolated developments. They are expressions of a historical transition driven by contradictions that no ruling class can permanently suppress.

It is within this broader movement of history that Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei’s political legacy should be situated. Whatever differences exist between Marxists and the ideological foundations of the Islamic Republic, his consistent opposition to imperialist domination formed part of the wider international struggle through which oppressed nations continue to reshape the global balance of forces. His political life became one expression of a larger historical tendency in which the era of uncontested imperial hegemony is steadily giving way to an era of intensified resistance, national sovereignty and the growing assertion of the peoples of Asia, Africa and Latin America.

For the Communist Party Marxist Kenya, the lessons of the recent war extend far beyond military developments. They confirm once again that no imperial power, however formidable its arsenal, can indefinitely impose its will upon peoples determined to defend their sovereignty. Imperialism may delay history through violence, but it cannot arrest history altogether. The contradictions that define the imperialist epoch continue to deepen, while the capacity of oppressed peoples to organize, resist and shape the future continues to expand. History therefore remains on the side of those who struggle for liberation rather than domination.

History Will Deliver Its Verdict

History teaches that no empire is eternal. Every imperial order, however mighty it may appear, carries within itself the contradictions that ultimately produce its decline. Empires rise. Empires expand. Empires imagine themselves invincible. Yet the same contradictions that fuel their expansion eventually become the conditions of their decay. The oppressed endure, organize and struggle until they transform history in their favor.

Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei understood that genuine independence cannot be granted by imperialism. It must be defended through steadfastness, sacrifice and the confidence of a people determined to shape their own destiny. His unwavering defense of national sovereignty, his uncompromising solidarity with the Palestinian people and his consistent opposition to imperialist aggression have secured him a place among the enduring figures of the international anti imperialist movement.

Military aggression may destroy infrastructure. Economic sanctions may inflict suffering. Assassinations may remove individual leaders. Propaganda may distort reality.

Yet none of these can extinguish ideas that have taken root among millions of oppressed people.

Individuals die.

Ideas endure.

The principles for which Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei stood cannot be buried by bombs, sanctions, siege or threats because they have become part of the collective political consciousness of peoples struggling against domination. Once an idea is embraced by the masses and translated into organized struggle, it acquires a historical force that no army can permanently defeat.

The Communist Party Marxist Kenya believes that Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei’s political legacy will continue to inspire future generations across Asia, Africa, Latin America and every part of the world where peoples continue to resist imperialism, colonialism, Zionism and national oppression. His legacy now belongs not only to Iran but also to the broader history of humanity’s struggle for sovereignty, dignity and liberation.

History remembers leaders not simply because they occupied high office, commanded armies or exercised state power. It remembers those who, in decisive moments, gave political expression to the aspirations of their people and stood firm when surrender appeared easier than resistance. Whether future generations agree with every aspect of Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei’s political philosophy is a question history itself will continue to examine. What cannot be denied is that he became one of the defining symbols of resistance to imperial domination during the opening decades of the twenty first century.

The struggle against imperialism has never depended upon one individual. It began long before Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei and it will continue long after all of today’s leaders have passed into history. The movement of history is driven not by great personalities alone but by the organized activity of millions of workers, peasants, youth, women, intellectuals and oppressed nations determined to secure their liberation. It is the masses who ultimately make history, and it is through their struggles that every empire is brought to an end.

For this reason, mourning must never become political resignation. The greatest tribute that can be paid to those who resisted imperialism is not simply to remember them but to continue the struggle to which they devoted their lives. Every generation inherits unfinished tasks from those who came before it. Our generation has inherited the task of defeating imperialism, ending colonial domination, securing the liberation of Palestine, defending national sovereignty and advancing a world founded upon justice, equality, peace and genuine international solidarity.

History will deliver its own verdict.

Empires will decline.

Nations will liberate themselves.

The peoples of the world will continue to resist.

Palestine will be free.

Imperialism will be defeated.

In that historical process, the legacy of Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei will outlive United States imperialism because ideas rooted in the aspirations of oppressed peoples cannot be destroyed by force. States may wage war against nations. Armies may occupy territories. Economies may be subjected to sanctions. Leaders may pass away. But no power can permanently extinguish a people determined to be free.

Today we stand in solidarity with the people of Iran during this period of mourning. We honor a leader who refused to kneel before imperialism, who remained steadfast in defense of Palestine, who inspired millions to believe that sovereignty is worth defending and that resistance against domination is both legitimate and necessary.

May the people of Iran continue to defend their independence.

May the Palestinian people achieve complete national liberation.

May the peoples of the world deepen their unity against imperialism.

Long live international solidarity.

Long live the struggle against imperialism.

Long live the liberation of Palestine.

Issued by the General Secretary, Central Organizing Committee

Communist Party Marxist Kenya

4 July 2026

 

"Accumulation through waste"

 
 
 

Thanks to the translate feature on Twitter, Muslims around the world seeing what Japanese really think about us.

Cw racism and self harm (in replies)

Its kinda heartwarming to see people of many languages agree this is messed up and criticizing Japanese racism

spoiler

view more: next ›