this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
81 points (96.6% liked)

Slop.

746 readers
458 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Note to the haters: if you threaten me like you apparently threatened the poster of the other thread complaining about cm0002's multiple accounts which caused them to delete their post and their account and leave Lemmy, I will report you and repost screenshots of your threats publicly. If you act too egregiously, I will report you to law enforcement and/or my lawyer. I have legal insurance and am willing to use it. Be civil and let us have a civilized discussion.

I had noticed that cm0002 was a high-volume poster on Lemmy a while ago. After they cross-posted a few of my posts from lemmy.ml communities to other communities on other instances, I asked them about their motivation for doing this. They are open and public about their desire to draw traffic away from lemmy.ml and support away from Lemmy devs because they think that "tankies" are going to destroy the Threadiverse. I was having a decent, amicable discussion with them on direct messages, but as soon as I expressed that I was sympathetic to some of the political views of the so-called "tankies", I never got a reply.

Then the whole post about them creating accounts on pretty much every Threadiverse instance came up just yesterday (https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/45730651). While some people defended this type of activity as not being ban-evasion because they are not trying to hide being the same user, I feel that if nothing else, this makes it more difficult for moderators to review a user's posting history to spot a pattern of bad behavior. If someone reports one of the (dozens? hundreds?) of cm0002 accounts, a mod may see only a few posts from the reported account and not get a full picture of this user.

Finally, I started looking into their one-person crusade against Lemmy devs, lemmy.ml, and "tankies". I started looking at their claims more closely and didn't like what I saw. To me it seems like they are making many distorted or debatable claims and spamming the Threadiverse with these. I read their "megathread" (https://sh.itjust.works/post/37226752) of supposed evidence that the Lemmy devs, lemmy.ml, and "tankies" are bad, and think the whole thing is lame, flawed, and dangerous:

  • First, notice that the majority of posts that they link contain only what they would like you to see, and not a link to the original thread where one would be able evaluate the context for what was said.

  • Second, notice that even where screenshots are provided, what the list item claims was said is most often not what was actually said. In other words, distortions. Specifically, most of the items that are claimed to be direct quotes (based on the quote marks around them) don't at all appear to be actual quotes. I'm not a lawyer, but I would think that in many jurisdictions this would be grounds for a libel lawsuit.

  • Third, most of the items that are not outright distortions are either exaggerations or debatable.

I personally feel that this crusade is more damaging to the Threadiverse than anything that they have complained about. I've been tired for a while of all the whining that I see here about "tankies" (Tankie Derangement Syndrome?), but have been holding my tongue. All this stuff from cm0002 is finally driving me to respond. Look, it's fine to have the beliefs of a liberal, conservative, MAGA, loyal supporter of the United States' imperial project, or a "tankie". Live and let live. Learn to accept that people who think differently from you may have legitimate and valid reasons for thinking that way, as much as you may disagree (except fascists). I wish people would learn to agree to disagree after a discussion reaches a certain point where it becomes clear that it's no longer productive. What's not fine is to relentlessly target and persecute other people and other instances (again, except fascists). This is why I call this a crusade, because it's nearly religious in nature. These people and instances haven't committed any crime. Threadiverse visitors don't deserve to be bombarded with all the whining and complaining that we often see. For all the complaining that I see about "Russian/Chinese bots", I sometimes wonder if many of the complainers aren't either intelligence or corporate agents trying to destabilize the Threadiverse.

My proposal: If nothing else comes out of this, I think that it would be beneficial to the Threadiverse if all instances added rules against disparaging, targeting, and persecuting other instances and users of other instances in general, especially if using false claims that border on libel, if they don't already have such a rule. If we want to see the Threadiverse be sustainable as a Reddit alternative in the long term, I think that this would be a useful step contributing to that.

Another thing: I think that most instances defederating the so-called "tankie triad" (hexbear.net, lemmygrad.ml and lemmy.ml) is stupid to start with and damaging to the health of Lemmy and the Threadiverse (Lemmy/Mbin/Piefed), considering that at least Lemmy (and I imagine the others too) now allows users to block entire instances and allows admins to make this user-level block the default for new users. My instance, lemmy.zip, takes this default user-level block approach (for hexbear and lemmygrad) and I think that it's a reasonable way to handle any concerns about the "triad".

Anyway, I decided to look through cm0002's "megathread" (https://sh.itjust.works/post/37226752) that they keep spamming and make comments showing how just about every item on the list is flawed, in my opinion. I only looked through the supposed "noteworthy selection" since those have their comments about the item on the main list. I suspect that most people wouldn't look past that list and take it at face value. Note that most of them seem to indicate either problems with reading comprehension, malicious distortions, or lame complaints about random internet comments. There is no point in debating the items below with me. It's fine to debate the items above with me. Like I said above, learn to accept that people may think differently than you do and learn to agree to disagree.

Dessalines - Head .ml admin - Head Lemmy Dev

  1. “Slava Ukraini” is considered a “Fascist slogan” - https://lemmy.world/post/36065538 - Debatable. It has a history of use by fascists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slava_Ukraini

  2. “NK is actually good, and anything counter to that is Western LIES” - https://lemmy.world/post/31595035 - Distortion. Note the quotes, making this appear to be a direct quote, whereas Dessalines doesn't appear to have written the quoted text on this linked thread.

  3. “The BBC is not a credible news source” - https://lemmy.world/post/35824465 - Debatable. First, it's a partial quote with no link to the original thread to get the context of the comment. Second, not credible is perhaps exaggerating a bit, but BBC news earns plenty of valid criticisms about bias. Here's a collection of many of the criticisms: https://iea.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/BBC%20Bias%20Chp%203.pdf

  4. Showing support for Ukraine on .ml is worthy of a site ban - https://lemmy.world/post/32775563 - Distortion, debatable, and exaggeration. First, the comment used the slogan from item 1. Second, also note that it was a 30 day ban, which the lemmy.ml code of conduct appears to call a "kick" as opposed to a permanent ban.

  5. Open declaration of support for Russia - https://lemmy.world/post/27352415 - Distortion and debatable. Even though from what I've seen in the past I believe that Dessalines possibly supports Russia, that is not what the posted chart shows. The chart is not unconditionally supporting Russia. It's making the claim that if a person supports Russia (in the Russia-Ukraine conflict) AND Palestine (in the Israel-Palestine conflict), it means they "fully understands the core of international geopolitics, while if they support Russia AND Israel, they believe in "Social Darwinism" (i.e., the discredited idea that stronger countries are always right). In other words, the chart is absolutely not unconditionally supporting Russia.

  6. "Don’t worry guys, the Uyghur Genocide was REALLY just birth control! - https://lemmy.world/post/30580167 - Distortion. Again a completely fake quote and again no link to original thread for context.

  7. Censoring criticism of China while allowing fellow “in-crowd” user “concentration camps were just reeducation camps and weren’t that bad” misinfo to remain - https://lemmy.world/post/26985447 - Distortion and Debatable. The first comment that was removed seemed to be criticizing the Soviet Union for having had "concentration camps" and the second post from the user removed for criticizing China for also having "concentration camps". Did the USSR have concentration camps? The first result that uses that term when I searched was literally the CIA website, and when you read the historical document there, it is clear that they are calling the gulags (prisons) "concentration camps". Regarding China having those (presumably referring to the Uyghurs in Xinjiang), Wikipedia itself calls them internment camps, similar to the Japanese internment camps in the US during World War II. Meanwhile, cm0002 complains about a comment using the term "shitlib", which is a criticism of someone's political philosophy, not being removed. The two are not equivalent.

  8. Censoring when users call out propaganda - https://lemmy.world/post/32776038 | https://lemmy.world/post/33416433 | https://lemmy.world/post/34051329 | https://lemmy.world/post/35919522 - Debatable. At least some of the removed comments seem to be purely anti-Russia ("Fuck russia!"). The others seem debatable on the basis that other instances' admins do the same or worse.

  9. Discussing winnie the pooh and/or the negatives of china is a 30 day ban - https://lemmy.world/post/35374967 - Debatable. This is pretty weaksauce to use as a reason to defederate one of the top Lemmy instances.

Davel - .ml admin

  1. Spreading anti-ukraine Russian propaganda - https://lemmy.world/post/34655572 - Misinformation. The article they're complaining about literally links to documents on the CIA's own website discussing their 1957 plans. Is it "Russian propaganda" to discuss historical facts?

  2. General negative sentiment to other instances who haven’t “seen the way” yet - https://lemmy.world/post/27426510 - I don't even understand this one, plus again no link to original thread for context.

  3. “See! nobody died IN Tiananmen Square, just AROUND it, so it doesn’t count!!” - https://lemmy.world/post/30673342 - Distortion. No link to original thread for context, no evidence that they wrote what is "quoted".

  4. Response to a valid report of “NK is actually good” as propaganda/misinfo https://lemmy.world/post/32627834 - Distortion and debatable. Once again, not actual quote and no link to thread for context. The meme itself is obviously shitposting, FFS.

  5. Removal of a credible article that was on the Uyghur genocide - https://lemmy.world/post/33205310 - Debatable. The mod removed a story that they saw as bigoted, possibly because of xenophobia. No link to original article or the cross-posted thread.

  6. It’s totally fine when Russia kills woman and children, war is war after all - https://lemmy.world/post/33224299 - Distortion. First, no link to thread for context. Second, they are distorting what was said. The actual quote: "Still not a genocide. There is no war where women, children, and other civilians don't end up getting killed."

Nutomic - 2nd in command Lemmy Dev

  1. Their continued transphobia - https://lemmy.world/post/29222558 - Debatable. No link to thread for context, and they were contrite in the screenshots.

General Tankie user behaviour [note: this is about random users of lemmy.ml]

  1. “Propaganda is good actually” - https://lemmy.world/post/36162233 - Distortion and debatable. No link to thread for context. Partial quote taking it out of context. The actual full quote in the screenshot: "Anyone pushing their views is propaganda. Propaganda isn't always a bad thing, propaganda can be good, like antifascist or pro-communist propaganda, or it can be bad, like fascist propaganda."

  2. “The China censorship tool isnt actually censorship! And if it is, it’s actually a good thing a state has that much power!” https://lemmy.world/post/30010789 - Distortion. Again no link to thread for context, plus no indication that what they claim to be a direct "quote" was actually written by the person. Besides, this is a random user linking to a YouTube video.

  3. Rooting for Russia in the Russia-Ukraine war https://lemmy.world/post/29274763 - Distorion. No link to original thread for context, and screenshot does not say what this item claims.

  4. Spreading Russia talking points like the Ukraine invasion just being a “negotiating tactic” https://lemmy.world/post/27012640 - Distortion. No link to original thread for context. The article in the screenshot claims "Not enough to conquer Ukraine, the invading force was sufficient to persuade Ukraine to the negotiating table." That is not saying that they invaded only to bring Ukraine to the negotiating table, but that Ukraine came to the negotiating table as a result of the invasion. Different meanings.

  5. Biden is worse than Trump - https://lemmy.world/post/33631617 - Distortion. No link to original thread for context. What was actually written by a random user on the screenshot: "I'd argue Biden is worse. Trump is honest about being a terrible person. Biden pretends to be good."

  6. Uyghur Genocide denialism - https://lemmy.world/post/33873969 - Distortion. No link to original thread for context. Not an accurate summation of what was said.

I reserve the right to edit this post to clarify points and/or add additional thoughts.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rom@hexbear.net 55 points 1 month ago

I ain't reading all that. Free Palestine.

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 50 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

one funny moment i remember was when they wrote an essay "meme" about us being happy that lemmee close down and that we ruined the lemmyverse forever

edit: found it lol, literally only because one user left

[–] lib1@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago

For me it was just Tuesday

[–] Staines@hexbear.net 45 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

tl;dr -- Someone stating the obvious with a bulletpoint breakdown that there is a user (cm0002) with a grudge against "tankie triad" using self-declared alts and pushing demonstrably untrue smears onto the rest of the lemmyverse to paint us in a bad light. And yeah, it's true. There is a weird circus of lies out there to discredit us by using the most flimsy, poorly spun dramatics.

This whole project is run by communist devs who earnestly believe in user freedom. A side effect of that the devs won't actually ban people who are calling them authoritarian tyrants. Ironically, cm0002's deranged crusade simply proves the moral purity (if not superiority) of their opponents. A pleasant side effect that it has on hexbear is that it filters out the gullible from engaging with us.

[–] axont@hexbear.net 45 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Where do people find the time or energy to write any of this

If you don't like a forum just press the close button on your browser lol

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 40 points 1 month ago (6 children)

fwiw the user is responding to an ongoing smear campaign across all of the various forums which consists of people throwing walls of text/links with hyperbolic misrepresentation. even if you ignore it, you'll get people making shitty comments to you in unrelated forums as a result of it

[–] nothx@hexbear.net 34 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yeah I remember one of my friends was all on board with Lemmy until they read one of those wall of texts trying to call the lemmy devs red fascists. It worked because they went back to Reddit, but in my 2 years on lemmy I haven’t noticed any sort of fascist behavior compared to fucking Reddit….

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

your friend is silly and you should clown on them at every opportunity

[–] nothx@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Big time LIB

Argues with me all the time about how change is slow which is why we just need to keep voting more progressives into the Democratic Party.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 42 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Why is this in /c/slop? This user might be a liberal, but they're more or less correct in this post.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think talking about the mwog crusade should basically always go in slop unless it's directly presenting some sort of administrative referendum or something. It's all a waste of time we should spare uninterested users from.

[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's fine, but there should be some context added to the post to explain that the intent is not the ridicule the linked user. What they're doing might be pointless (the lemmitors will embrace hitler before they give up on their red scare nonsense), and it might be driven by liberal reasoning, but they're not doing anything deserving of mockery.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 25 points 1 month ago

lol @ the Holodomor post where some lib is all "I studied this in 2011 and there's no one you can blame except the Soviets."

Apparently that person studied wrong because we have anti-Soviet, anti-communist sources who say kulaks slaughtered hundreds of thousands of animals and torched grain stockpiles before fleeing the country.

[–] Dessa@hexbear.net 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wow, they're on an absolute crusade against Dessalines specifically.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 24 points 1 month ago

The replies they're getting over there definitely fit though lol

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 month ago (4 children)

The slop trough is more in the responses to them, the topic being anonymous reactionary bullshit I think makes it fit here though

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Cricket@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I try not to be a liberal, but was also trying to make my argument from a somewhat neutral and calm standpoint to try to get more people to absorb it.

[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I assumed you were a liberal because your points focused on whether the things he said were based on truthful representations of the arguments of others, and not whether his arguments were incorrect regardless, but I thought it might have also just been you tailoring your argument to a certain audience.

I apologize for getting it wrong! rat-salute-2 Salute to your work in the posting trenches, I don't think I could put that much effort into interacting with these "tankie"-obsessed people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] teagrrl@lemmy.ml 42 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

I had a very unpleasant encounter with this individual (cm0002) who kept reposting my photography over to lemmy.world without attribution and tried to rope me into whatever perceived slight he had against lemmy.ml at that point in his crusade against the admins. Eventually I got him to stop, but I think that was my first person I ever had to block on lemmy.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] anaesidemus@hexbear.net 40 points 1 month ago

Is it "Russian propaganda" to discuss historical facts?

well yes, reality has a well known leftist bias

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 38 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I bet the biggest detractors to the "Tankie Triad" are reddit employees.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

do you think the NSA plants know what a tankie is?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 33 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Why does only Dessalines and Davel get to have "hot take" dossiers, I feel hexbear is being left out.

We have five years worth of admin slop across like three-ish different admin teams, thats at least got to make for interesting reading for these dorks.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 32 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Access to Lemmy.zip Restricted for UK Users

Due to the United Kingdom’s Online Safety Act, users from the UK can no longer access Lemmy.zip.

Fucking losers lmao.

What are you doing lemmy.zip? Do you think this is a big own against the UK government? That you're encouraging UK users to do something about it by.... Complying with the law? By creating a situation where the UK government doesn't have to spend resources or energy to block you themselves because you willingly and voluntarily block UK users yourself?

Lmao "write to your MP" won't do JACK FUCKING SHIT for a law that was implemented despite unpopularity you absolute dickheads.

You know what does help? Genuinely demonstrating that it's pointless. By refusing to be governed. By being ungovernable and demonstrating the futility of the law.

Liberals are so bad at this.

Anyway, the post is good.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] booty@hexbear.net 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What even the fuck

I try to read the post and my eyes just slide right off it, like my body is telling me this is some infohazard shit

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 30 points 1 month ago

Also reading about this perspn "cm0002" being a complete liar who dedicated whatever free life they have left from working and sleeping to quite literally spinning and weaving whole tapestries of bullshit, speckled with corn, about the spooky scary communists reminds me of the historical precedent of the same playbook of reactionaries fabricating then peddling bald-faced lies about the communists.

I believe it was in John Reed's journalistic recording of his first hand experience of the October Revolution in Petrograd, later compiled into the book "ten days that shook the world", where an event occured and what he reported first-hand vs what was reported internationally were two completely different worlds of events. The event was about the Bolshevik red guards capturing a telegraph station and utilizing it to broadcast down the wires across the empire that the Revolution had started and they were winning in Petrograd. When they captured the station, it was one of the rare places women were allowed to work so it was noted in Reed's journalistic investigation that the red guards felt fairly awkward about holding them captive and moreso just kept to themselves and waited for a Bolshevik partymember to come and sort things out. Eventually someone did show up, and announced that the telegraph station was now under official control of the party and would resume operation under its direction, with any worker that wished to stay to receive additional pay and benefits in exchange for their work in addition to training new workers, and anyone that did not want to stay was free to go. Later some of the women who left for the Whites met with journalists and crafted heinously lurid stories of massacre, barbarism, looting, and sexual exploitation that was visited upon them by Neanderthal-esque savages dressed like factory workers lead by demon-possessed communist brigands. Of course their story went international while the truth would've stayed buried if it wasn't for the fact a brave American communist journalist was there to witness and record it.

Anyways whole point is that reactionary anti-communists will literally lie and fabricate history to fight against the liberation of the human race.

[–] mendiCAN@hexbear.net 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

i actually decided to skim some of this, and it just seems a pretty reasonable take. sure it's not strong on facts and lib asf but i don't hate this. Seems the overarching point is "they see all the hate of the 'tankie triad' as ridiculous, people have different perspectives, and they're tired of cm0002s crusade." Refreshing when compared to the dreck i usually find coming from that space.

Unless i missed something?

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

I read it and it's just kind of a waste of time. They have no ideological clarity, they are just a rudderless lib and struggle to actually make a good point because they want to stand in epistemic suspense that is scared of making any sort of claim besides "well, the user didn't literally say that". The only good thing in their bulletpoints that I noticed was mentioning that it's reasonable to criticize the BBC.

Because their ideology is incoherent, they say:

Look, it’s fine to have the beliefs of a liberal, conservative, MAGA, loyal supporter of the United States’ imperial project, or a “tankie”. Live and let live. Learn to accept that people who think differently from you may have legitimate and valid reasons for thinking that way, as much as you may disagree (except fascists). I wish people would learn to agree to disagree after a discussion reaches a certain point where it becomes clear that it’s no longer productive. What’s not fine is to relentlessly target and persecute other people and other instances (again, except fascists).

On what basis should fascism be regarded as invalid but not MAGA or support for US imperialism? This literally only makes sense if you regard only westerners as humans. The reason they are saying this is because they don't have principles, they have social norms on how to be a good lib, the difference being that there aren't first principles to reason from, just edicts to follow based on what is and isn't acceptable. Pluralism that includes virulant racists is good because that's what's normal, it's part of The Discourse, but fascists are bad because fascists are bad, and there's no need to consider why fascists are bad and how that could relate to camps who are within what is popularly considered acceptable discourse, making other groups and ideologies also unacceptable.

This is a thread that will be posted on mwog so let me be extra explicit: I agree fascists are bad, but I'm not reasoning from the premise that fascists are bad, I'm reasoning from the premise that humanity needs to embrace a democracy that has social equality amongst all people, which brings me to the conclusion that fascism is bad, as well as the conclusion that MAGA and US imperialism are blatantly also bad. I fully believe that this person is only repeating conclusions that are also premises in the part I quoted, and if those premises are contradictory then oh well. It's like a child repeating what their parents say.

Live and let live. Learn to accept that people who think differently from you may have legitimate and valid reasons for thinking that way, as much as you may disagree

I don't quote Chapo that much, but they have a very good refutation of exactly this rhetoric. Heavily paraphrasing:

What are the diverse interests? You make it sound like some people say "I want us to eat spaghetti for dinner," while other say "I want us to have hamburgers". When I think of diverse interests, what I think of is a businessman saying: "I own this copper wire factory and I want to pollute this river. I want to dump this toxic waste into a poor neighborhood." Another interest might be, "Hey, I live in the poor neighborhood and I don't want to die, please." It's not just "perspectives" . . . This has nothing to do with ideology, with "legitimate reasons" and pseudo-intellectual bullshit, it's a matter of moneyed interests enacting social murder on the poor.

The poster themselves admit that it's perfectly fine to exclude people, but they don't establish why because they themselves cannot tell you, they don't have any basis for it, and therefore they aren't able to recognize when groups that the media calls acceptable do not actually have "legitimate and valid reasons." What fucking reason do MAGA hogs have? None, they are ideologically superior to fascists in literally no manner and would sign on to Hitlerian fascism if they had the power to, but they have news networks and political representation, so the poster needs to pretend MAGA's "perspective" is valid because they literally only have flimsy and arbitrary social norms to base their judgements on.

They have put themselves in a place where the only wrong is not being pluralist, and there's no actual truth to the matter of if ruthless racial persecution is a valid political project or not because every side has "legitimate and valid reasons". It's bullshit and this person is a spineless enabler.

As an aside, if you have the context of the post, one of the comments is truly hilarious:

Dude, I do recommend you look into yourself asking why so many people are disgusted by your believes and want to isolate you. It’s absolutely not something only 1 or 2 people do, and it’s not some frivolous preconception from people that never got you the benefit of the doubt.

You’ve got a rare opportunity where the bubble your ideas create got temporarily busted. It will form around you again if you don’t take it to reevaluate those ideas.

Such a condescending remark trying to "deradicalize" a "tankie", when the poster is just a lib and the commenter is acting like liberalism isn't the monoculture. It's like Republicans calling Biden a communist combined with the responder believing they are some enlightened person who isn't in a bubble at all, but also holds the hegemonic ideology and can only point to social consensus while accusing someone else of being in a bubble.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] CloutAtlas@hexbear.net 26 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I remember my younger days trying to counter cryptofash and libs with facts.

It doesn't work, I know your heart is in the right place, but they'll use "facts and logic" against their opponents and completely ignore it for their side. Don't do an effort post about some lib who has a dozen alts dedicated to hating "tankies". They don't care, they just want to be a reactionary.

[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 25 points 1 month ago

Don't do an effort post about some lib who has a dozen alts dedicated to hating "tankies". They don't care, they just want to be a reactionary.

I agree that fash and cryptofash don't relaly care about the "facts and logic" they claim to value, but this post is pretty clearly aimed at the general user base of the site and not the specific anti-tankie user.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i don't think oop is trying to convince cm000002 of anything, posts like this are for everyone else to understand just how much of a clown that guy is

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah I gave up trying to argue with reactionaries years ago (probably over a decade). They believe in nothing except cynical, nihilistic grabs for power. They will lie, contradict themselves, resort to name-calling/slurs, etc. before they ever engage in good faith.

Libs I've mostly given up on, but I don't get confrontational with them the way I do conservatives. You can sometimes get libs to see how Isreal is bad or pull them away from anti-China rhetoric. Conservatives I will immediately get up in their shit with bullying and concern trolling because that's the only thing they respond to. The goal being to chase them out of a space before they think they're welcome and start bringing their friends to turn the place into a nazi bar.

[–] jackmaoist@hexbear.net 25 points 1 month ago

I ain't reading all that. Free Palestine

[–] Soot@hexbear.net 23 points 1 month ago

TLDR

Be gay. Do crime.

[–] Cricket@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I wrote the wall of text. Sorry it's so long. I'm considering the responses and criticisms here too. AMA.

Edit: I've also been reading some of the responses to my post here and will try to respond to some of them.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Fwiw i think your wall of texts was good and fine, and appreciate your speaking out against the tidal wave of slander directed at us by a few obsessive empire apologists.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Appreciate the defense but also I ain’t reading all that. Dude needs to touch-grass logout

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 19 points 1 month ago
load more comments
view more: next ›