this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2025
25 points (96.3% liked)

TechTakes

2295 readers
92 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Want to wade into the sandy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 2 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

Yud:

one of Earth's top scientists on sex and gender has published her latest work

It's Aella.

[–] CinnasVerses@awful.systems 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I'm not sure her work is any worse than the average psychology paper that ends up in a magazine rack, but I am not signing up for her Substack to see. And "no worse than the average psychology paper" is not high praise.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] CinnasVerses@awful.systems 2 points 54 minutes ago

I think she would be willing to learn how to cite things, not sure whether she wants to learn why just surveying people is not the best way to find the truth. Pretty sure that her interest in trans people is not purely scientific.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 3 points 1 hour ago

yeah and I’m a brain surgeon because sometimes when I pick my nose I go a little too deep

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

at://did:plc:x2obbaxjktznf67mnhznpplp/app.bsky.feed.post/3m5z5da4mvk24

https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:x2obbaxjktznf67mnhznpplp/post/3m5z5da4mvk24

Windscribe's twitter account being transphobic.

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 1 points 2 hours ago

Free speech can he expensive for dipshits.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

I saw this, so now you all get to: Alex Karp performs a stationary Gatotsu with a sabre, don’t ask me why.

E: reference explainer and visual descriptionThe Gatotsu is a fictional swordfighting style from the manga/anime series Rurouni Kenshin wielded by Saitou Hajime, one of the main characters. It also refers to the frequent stance and movement Hajime makes when fighting.

In the video, Alex Karp stands next to a young woman. One may surmise that he is trying to impress her with a display of sword mastery. In his right hand he is holding a broad, curved sword, maybe a sabre. His left arm is outstretched at shoulder height in front of him, pointing at an imaginary target, and the sword is pointing at the same target, held at the same height with the flat side parallel to the ground. He performs an awkward looking thrust, as if mimicking the Gatotsu as mentioned above. In the rest of the video he is playing around with the sword, sometimes performing the same thrust and otherwise tossing it limply around in his hand.

There is text at the top of video reading:

Your CEO: Powerpoint

Palantir CEO:

[–] ShakingMyHead@awful.systems 2 points 53 minutes ago* (last edited 50 minutes ago)

Out of all of the things he did, that is one of those things.

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 8 points 10 hours ago

While you partied

I studied THE BLADE

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Databricks CEO: “we’ve already achieved AGI fam, the haters just keep moving the goalposts”

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

WTF are databricks? LLM feces?

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 5 points 3 hours ago

I looked it up.

boring answer

the company is a data analytics platform. According to wikipedia they promote the model of a “data lakehouse”, a hydrid of a “data lake” and a “data warehouse”. I don’t know what any of this means

Sneer answer: 100% LLM feces. Databricks puts the anal in analytics

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 4 points 12 hours ago

Little late but just found out that Google has partnered with Movember to push Gemini.

[–] mirrorwitch@awful.systems 12 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

@cityofangelle.bsky.social comments:

HAHAAHHAHAAHHAAA

Anthropic has posted two jobs, both paying $200K+.

FOR WRITERS. (Looks like a policy/comms hybrid.)

ANTHROPIC.

IS WILLING TO PAY HALF A MILLION A YEAR.

FOR WRITERS.

Whatsamatter boys, can't your plagiarism machine make a compelling case for you?

LOL. LMAO, even.

[–] catsalad@infosec.exchange 4 points 15 hours ago

@mirrorwitch @BlueMonday1984 ᄏᄏᄏᄏᄏᄏᄏᄏᄏᄏᄏᄏᄏᄏᄏ

[–] menos@todon.eu 5 points 20 hours ago

@mirrorwitch @BlueMonday1984 Apparently they're doing the same with video cutters, offering fairly well paid jobs for people to try and make themselves redundant.

[–] phil_stevens@mastodon.nz 5 points 20 hours ago

@mirrorwitch @BlueMonday1984 Maybe they just need to be *really* good at writing prompts.

[–] scruiser@awful.systems 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Continuation of the lesswrong drama I posted about recently:

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HbkNAyAoa4gCnuzwa/wei-dai-s-shortform?commentId=nMaWdu727wh8ukGms

Did you know that post authors can moderate their own comments section? Someone disagreeing with you too much but getting upvoted? You can ban them from your responding to your post (but not block them entirely???)! And, the cherry on top of this questionable moderation "feature", guess why it was implemented? Eliezer Yudkowsky was mad about highly upvoted comments responding to his post that he felt didn't get him or didn't deserve that, so instead of asking moderators to block on a case-by-case basis (or, acasual God forbid, consider maybe if the communication problem was on his end), he asked for a modification to the lesswrong forums to enable authors to ban people (and delete the offending replies!!!) from their posts! It's such a bizarre forum moderation choice, but I guess habryka knew who the real leader is and had it implemented.

Eliezer himself is called to weigh in:

It's indeed the case that I haven't been attracted back to LW by the moderation options that I hoped might accomplish that. Even dealing with Twitter feels better than dealing with LW comments, where people are putting more effort into more complicated misinterpretations and getting more visibly upvoted in a way that feels worse. The last time I wanted to post something that felt like it belonged on LW, I would have only done that if it'd had Twitter's options for turning off commenting entirely.

So yes, I suppose that people could go ahead and make this decision without me. I haven't been using my moderation powers to delete the elaborate-misinterpretation comments because it does not feel like the system is set up to make that seem like a sympathetic decision to the audience, and does waste the effort of the people who perhaps imagine themselves to be dutiful commentators.

Uh, considering his recent twitter post... this sure is something. Also" "it does not feel like the system is set up to make that seem like a sympathetic decision to the audience" no shit sherlock, deleting a highly upvoted reply because it feels like too much effort to respond to is in fact going to make people unsympathetic (at the least).

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

From this (indirectly) I learned that they got wordpress.com to sponsor their "Inkhaven Residency". Feh.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

ooooh photographic matthew embarking upon his f*shtech turn out loud at last?

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 3 points 9 hours ago

Maybe? Or maybe they just had the right social connections to sell "blogging residency" as a thing that should be supported for some unspecified amount? I couldn't find any more details.

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago

Small forum tyrants

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

sorry my brain's already clocked out for the day (/week?), so [insert sneer here]

context is this

Meanwhile, the $800 million Kraken raised across its two recent rounds of financing further solidifies the company’s balance sheet before its planned IPO next year.... Prior to the two rounds, Kraken had raised only $27 million in venture capital.

simply a mere 29.6x amplification. perfectly normal. 12000000% in line with the economic market shift between checks notes Less Than A Decade Ago and now

[–] istewart@awful.systems 3 points 14 hours ago

Reeks to me of a mad dash for all-important "exit" on the part of the VC firms who invested. Especially as public-market IPOs have become so rare compared to M&A deals or SPAC bullshit.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 8 points 1 day ago
[–] BurgersMcSlopshot@awful.systems 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

In other news, it appears that Cloudflare has pulled a Crowdstrike

edit: looks like the problem resolved after a few hours

[–] antifuchs@awful.systems 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Claims to be against politics in the workplace, takes down rightwing websites anyway

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

can we print this on shirts and send it to their office(s)?

I guess the main problem is getting reaction shots with the recipients...

[–] antifuchs@awful.systems 6 points 1 day ago

I would love this, lmfao

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

habryka:

I have never written a song (without AI assistance) in my life, but I am sure I could learn within a week.

FUCKIN

[–] nightsky@awful.systems 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is there already a term for the extreme opposite of impostor syndrome? Techbro syndrome maybe?

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago

"Techbro syndrome" would be a perfect name for it, honestly.

[–] lagrangeinterpolator@awful.systems 15 points 2 days ago (4 children)

In my experience most people just suck at learning new things, and vastly overestimate the depth of expertise. It doesn't take that long to learn how to do a thing. I have never written a song (without AI assistance) in my life, but I am sure I could learn within a week. I don't know how to draw, but I know I could become adequate for any specific task I am trying to achieve within a week. I have never made a 3D prototype in CAD and then used a 3D printer to print it, but I am sure I could learn within a few days.

This reminds me of another tech bro many years ago who also thought that expertise is overrated, and things really aren't that hard, you know? That belief eventually led him to make a public challenge that he could beat Magnus Carlsen in chess after a month of practice. The WSJ picked up on this, and decided to sponsor an actual match with him and Carlsen. They wrote a fawning article about it, but it did little to stop his enormous public humiliation in the chess community. Here's a reddit thread discussing that incident: https://www.reddit.com/r/HobbyDrama/comments/nb5b1k/chess_one_month_to_beat_magnus_how_an_obsessive/

As a sidenote, I found it really funny that he thought his best strategy was literally to train a neural network and ... memorize all the weights and run inference with mental calculations during the game. Of course, on the day of the match, the strategy was not successful because his algorithm "ran out of time calculating". How are so many techbros not even good at tech? Come on, that's the one thing you're supposed to know!

[–] CinnasVerses@awful.systems 5 points 22 hours ago

So pre-teen me reading the Biggles books with the gag about the pilot who tries to do ballistic calculations during a dogfight was saving me from being as stupid as a Californian?

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 9 points 1 day ago

He will train a neural network on GM games, then memorize the algorithm and compute the moves in his head.

The Rationalists.

[–] rook@awful.systems 15 points 1 day ago

Lord grant me the confidence of a mediocre white man, etc.

alt textA screenshot of a tweet by yougov, a uk-based organisation, showing the results of a survey which say

One in eight men (12%) say they could win a point in a game of tennis against 23 time grand slam winner Serena Williams

Include in the screenshot is a response by longwall26,

Confident in my ability to properly tennis, I take the court. I smile at my opponent. Serena does not return the gesture. She'd be prettier if she did, I think. She serves. The ball passes cleanly through my skull, killing me instantly

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›