this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
795 points (99.3% liked)

politics

26356 readers
2742 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Oh, they're going the "explaining the difference between a pedophile, a hebephile, and a ephebophile" route. Let's see if it works out for them.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's still trafficking and rape.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Is it really rape, if the guy enjoyed it?

  • Republicans' next talking point

These people are sick in the head.

load more comments (1 replies)

I hate that I know the words hebephile and ephebophile. I only know them because of people who do weird mental gymnastics to justify their creepy behaviour. "Um actually, he's an ephebophile, not a pedophile" is a huge red flag whenever I see it

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pedophilia isn't pedophilia?

The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

It's going to be more like "Those 15-year-old girls knew what they were getting into/needed the money/were asking for it because they were promiscuous anyway/and somehow were able to make adult decisions of consent when a 15-year-old kid can't even legally drive."

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The Narcissists Prayer

That didn't happen.
And if it did, it wasn't that bad. <----- We are here
And if it was, that's not a big deal.
And if it is, that's not my fault.
And if it was, I didn't mean it.
And if I did, you deserved it.

progress at last

[–] Ibex@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

The damage control has started. The bad thing is I can see some people being ok with her statements.

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The age puberty starts has been dropping and it now occurs earlier than ever in recorded history

But I imagine this fact actually appeals to conservatives and republicans

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The republican party has been leveraging people's misunderstanding of how the world works for decades.

An 8-year-old child can experience early-onset puberty, but that doesn't make them capable of making adult choices, much less make it remotely okay for someone to use them as cattle for old men to rape.

All any of this is, is more of the "well define the line" bullshit and distraction that they use to fight abortion rights and nearly every other social issue that allows women in particular to not be treated like cattle. They hate you, they hate your kids, they hate you existing and want only the worst outcomes for each of us.

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It should be also pointed out that he's totally innocent of elder abuse, due to the age of the victims. Why are people refusing to see the bright side of this? There are scores of crimes he's innocent of!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wetnoodle@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 day ago

Megyn Kelly is a pedophile and her teen daughter ain't safe with her

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

"This is this person's view, who was there for a lot of this, but that he was into the barely legal type. Like, he liked 15-year-old girls,

That's not 'barely legal'....

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Here it begins. Republicans will want to normalize pedophilia.

These people are sick. Saying this is public should earn a person an automatic 48 hour mental welfare hold.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Fox "News" simping for pedos, what else is new?

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 227 points 2 days ago (8 children)

There's a difference between a 15-year-old and a 5-year-old, you know?

She should not be able to walk down the street without constant reminder of making this statement about victims of sex trafficking. Absolute monster of a person.

[–] gdog05@lemmy.world 71 points 2 days ago (7 children)

There's a difference between a 15-year-old and a 5-year-old, you know?

"There really is, one is annoying and one is hot". -Trump, probably

load more comments (7 replies)

Megan Kelly has a 15 year old daughter, someone should call CPS and look into this poor kid if her mom thinks a grown man grooming her isnt a bad thing

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 132 points 1 day ago (24 children)

Holy shit they're actually doing the hebophile bit

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 52 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, but it's impossible to explain without sounding like a pedophile....

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 71 points 1 day ago (13 children)

Im sorry, is this a conversation about the degree to which he is a pedophile?

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Weeeeelllllll technically, that would make them ephebophiles. (Kelly is grabbing on to what ever she can to deflect). Medically, people sexually attracted to early to later teens. As far as what we know right now, there are no pedophiles, (pre-pubescent attraction) on the list. Though there might be a possibility. We just don't know yet.

In any case, rape most foul it most certainly was. And all of them need to be prosecuted and jailed for it. While being sued for every penny they have in civil court.

[–] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's a comedian bit about how pointing out that technically ephebophiles are different from pedophiles actually makes you look like a pedo.

It's crazy this woman is literally acting out a bit:

https://youtu.be/nu6C2KL_S9o

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

The "um it's ackchually ephebophilia" is spreading to the auth-right!

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 169 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] ryry1985@lemmy.world 72 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Yes, it's technically Hebephilia or Ephebophilia. That doesn't change the level of disdain.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

So the Republicans have gone from defending Trump to defending statutory r*pe in general. The law is really clear on what that is.

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"This is this person's view, who was there for a lot of this, but that he was into the barely legal type. Like, he liked 15-year-old girls," she continued. "I'm just giving you facts that he wasn't into, like, 8-year-olds. But he liked the very young teen types that could pass for even younger than they were, but would look legal to a passerby."

"And that is what I believed and that is what I reliably was told for many years."

Kelly admitted that she began to change her opinion after Attorney General Pam Bondi claimed that Epstein had thousands of videos with child sexual abuse material.

"For the first time, I thought, oh, no, he was an actual pedophile," the conservative host recalled.

Megan "I was fine with him fucking teenagers" Kelly, everyone.

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

But he liked the very young teen types that could pass for even younger than they were, but would look legal to a passerby."

How does this make any sense at all? How does one "pass as even younger" but still somehow "look legal to passersby"? Those are directly conflicting concepts.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] henfredemars 125 points 2 days ago

Look at those goalposts go!

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 117 points 2 days ago (11 children)

It is so predictable that conservatives would end up in "Pedophilia isn't that bad" once it became undeniable that Great Leader raped little girls.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

Raping teens instead of kids is just as heinous.

[–] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 49 points 1 day ago (3 children)

When you start making defenses that involve distinguishing between pedophilia and hebephilia you lost a long time ago.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JustKeepStretching@lemmy.world 66 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This is one of the wildest most disgusting goal post moves I've ever heard

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PissingIntoTheWind@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Ignore her. She’s reaching for attention. Her career is collapsing.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 day ago (4 children)

He's a hebephile not a pedophile isn't much of a defence. So he goes after 11+yo children instead of children less than 11yo? Also most people don't know, or rightly care, about the age distinction - both are child abusers.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In the next episode she will argue that domestic volence against women is a love language

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

"Is it really a crime if you're damaging your own property?"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world -1 points 16 hours ago

She probably got assaulted at that age but liked it

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›