Cool, me to.
this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
497 points (99.6% liked)
Linux Gaming
22043 readers
1713 users here now
Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.
This page can be subscribed to via RSS.
Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.
No memes/shitposts/low-effort posts, please.
Resources
WWW:
Discord:
IRC:
Matrix:
Telegram:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I hate Microsoft shoving AI down our throats. I will not upgrade to AI Windows. I just don't want to port over to a new OS because: (1) I like 10's GUI, (2) I don't trust an OS that I might not be able to run word or excel on because I do so much on them, and (3) my version of Windows doesn't have ads on it.
There are alternatives to Microsoft Office like LibreOffice and OnlyOffice. Plus you can still use Office 365 in a browser if it "has" to be Microsoft Office.
I put SteamOS on my handheld and turned it into my main PC. I haven't missed Windows even slightly.
They have a unique opportunity here to capitalise on Microsoft’s mistakes.
I'd say it's even more unique than a valuable competitive mistake/opportunity.
Valve has the chance to grow the brand and make a bunch of money and all the other standard goals for a company, sure. But they also have the opportunity to benefit the world in subtle but significant ways while getting richer.
A normal megacorp might not give a shit about that last part. But a company that is majority owned by one individual who is already a billionaire that looks like santa claus and presumably cares about his legacy and maybe even other people... it might just be possible!
It's even still a valid course of action if there's literally no interest in making the world better.
They've potentially found a way to make their nearly omnipresent e-commerce platform share a name with the operating system, which is coincidentally mostly developed by others. They get to associate their name with a few tens of billions of dollars of development effort for a fraction of the cost.
To be clear, this isn't bad or anything. It's quite literally what a lot of the people doing all that legwork want. It just doesn't require any altruism from valve. They make money selling games, and they sell more games when people think it's easier to play them. A desktop with the ease of a console is a big selling point for a lot of people.
Linux is getting too mainstream I gotta switch to freebsd /j
OS/2
It's just not the same if you don't have to fiddle for hours to get a game to run, is it?
I thought that was the game of Linux, the fiddling.
There's certainly a satisfaction in getting something to work in an environment it was never intended for.
But I can't deny that it's also nice that most games just work nowadays.
Haiku or bust!
if they sell easy install one/low click installs they’d make a killing.
If all the games I had worked on steam os I’d switch to Linux in a heartbeat.
Which ones don't?
The ones with kernel level rootkits. I think they call it "anti cheat detection"
Its crazy to me, because if these games were designed from the ground up to have server side validation, and to share information on a needs to know basis, you wouldn't really need any advanced client side AC and the process could just monitor itself and not spy on you as a complete black box.
Yes, this would cost money up front to develop differently such that this happened, and yes it would make the miniscule server costs slightly increased (and still miniscule), but its completely doable and they don't want to, because thats more money and no one is forcing them to.
Battlefield 6
Helldivers 2
CoD
I played Helldivers 2 on Linux literally last night
I have hundreds of hours in Helldivers 2 and I haven't played a single minute on Windows.
Crappy sweaty games I do too enjoy respawning simulator but I just stick to bf one that I paid a fiver for
Helldivers 2 works just fine on Linux..?
it does
Guy who owns the online, PC version of Gamestop: "What if we took on Microsoft and kicked those mfers in the balls?"
When it comes to this i personally tend to agree with what Brodie Robertson always says in his videos about SteamOS. It's kinda silly to keep waiting for an official release when things like Bazzite exist, but if the SteamOS release helps with more people making the switch, then that's still a good thing in the end.
For sure, I've been running Linux as my daily driver since... 2005? Fuck... and ran it on the side even before that. And I've been trying bazzite on my gaming PC and it's been pretty cool. But I'm still pumped about SteamOS, not because I'm planning on running it, but because any success SteamOS has will be likely directly applicable to Linux desktop gaming in general.
Every game that adjusts something to test on SteamOS will make it better for me off SteamOS. Every peripheral that is built to work with SteamOS, all the user demographic numbers that set priorities withing the gaming industry, are all great.
I'm excited for the year of the Linux desktop.
I am not waiting for it because I personally want to use it. I'm excited for the industry shaping power a Linux OS released by Valve will have.
I mostly agree with that, but the problem with Bazzite and CachyOS is that they are made by small teams. Distributions made by small teams might die because of some small problem, like a key member of the team being unable to continue with the project. Bazzite team, for example, earlier this year said that they would stop maintaining the OS if a proposed change to Fedora would go through, because their team wouldn’t be able cope with the change.
SteamOS on the other hand, being developed by a company with a lot of money to throw into things, is much more resilient OS, and I think that makes it better for larger masses of users.
I agree.
But as a sidenote, a few interesting facts:
- Debian is older than Google.
- Arch (2002) and Fedora (2003) both have outlasted more than 298 Google projects.
Those are silly comparisons.
How many distros have failed? How many Linux projects in general? (Since we're comparing random shit)
I am comparing random things, yes. If you don't find this trivia interesting, please ignore it.
This is a big reason why I would prefer a SteamOS Desktop over Cachy and friends. Also, documentation that is designed for people who don't have an interest in becoming masters of the terminal. My general impression of Linux as an intermediate user, is a Tower of Babel situation, everyone having different procedures for how to resolve the same issue.
It's a matter of priorities. A large portion of Linux users don't actually care about adoption. They're not selling the os, so the docs aren't designed for anyone who isn't already a user.
Valve on the other hand is paying people for documentation and good ux. That's enough to significantly boost the quality.
True, but anything running Bazzite could just as easily run Fedora atomic instead and basically no one could tell the difference. Fedora is sponsored by one of the largest tech companies on the planet.
load more comments
(2 replies)
view more: next ›