this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2025
290 points (98.3% liked)

News

33127 readers
2932 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 0 points 21 minutes ago

There are enough in circulation that nobody will miss the lack of printing for decades

[–] Avenging5@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 hours ago

Soon:

A: "Penny for your thoughts" B: "Lol, okay Gen Z"

[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 16 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Abolishing the USD cent comes way too late.

Was abolishing the half penny in 1857 a good idea? If so, then abolishing the quarter would be a good idea today. It has about as much buying power as the half penny did in 1857.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago

Paper dollars make no sense either.

[–] MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago

Yeah, but honestly getting rid of coins is an admission that inflation is high relative to 40-50 years ago. When pretty much every government wants to keep that fact out of the public consciousness. Especially the current US government who wants to both claim we don't have inflation at all, and are the ones getting rid of the penny.

I've been saying we should drop the penny for almost 2 decades, but I still kind of look at getting rid of the penny as a sign of our current government's abysmal handling of inflation.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

So I don't know the term for it, maybe it's just propaganda, but a quarter feels like it has value.

The penny however doesn't have that feeling. Vending machines often say "No Pennies" and toll booths say "No Pennies", even though the Penny exists everyone sorta already agreed the Penny wasn't worth the hassle.

I think you could probably convince people the same is true for the nickel. Although eliminating just the nickel is tricky since you'd keep the dime and quarter and that divides weirdly. So you should also remove the dime but that now really starts to feel like it had value.

But the quarter. That would be a hard sell. You're basically eliminating all coins at that point. Unless you plan on making the half dollar wayyy more popular.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

When we got rid of the half penny it was worth more than what dimes are worth now. Quarters are the only useful coin. We should be rounding all transactions to the nearest quarter.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Logically I completely agree. I just don't think you could convince the US as a whole that's the way to go.

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Should just have dimes.

$1.1 $1.2 $1.3

There's no reason to break our currency into thousandths. Hardly a reason to break it into hundredths.

Could keep quarters to keep hundredths

Transactions already need a nickel to do 5 cents. So requiring a quarter to do 5 cents isn't crazy.

Say you have to pay $1.05

Dollar and 3 dimes, quarter in change.

$1.15

Dollar and a quarter, dime in change.

But I think just dimes are needed

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Just dimes would probably work logically, but it would feel too weird. If you're going just dimes, you probably just want to go all in and say no coins.

[–] mos@lemmy.world 92 points 20 hours ago (4 children)
[–] BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Just get rid of half of it. I love "fall back." I hate "spring ahead."

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 9 hours ago

Fall back every year! Yes! No spring forward!

[–] oxideseven@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

No one can agree on which time to use so time change will never go away. It's really annoying. I don't give a shit which we use, just toss of the ducking time change. It's 1 hour, people gotta chill.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

Fuck at this point does it even matter? The time change is bullshit on a baseline so long as it's done on the state level it shouldnt be too bad since eventually one of them will probably win out.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 22 points 18 hours ago

Exactly. Fuck DST.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 10 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

I am a champion of the idea of keeping daylight saving over standard time but I am more and more starting to think that the time change is the best compromise we are going to get with the people who insist on getting to work at 8am in the light.

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Let's look at NY city.

June 21th longest day, sunrise is at 5:24 am (Set 8:31 pm)

December 21th longest night, sunrise is at 6:42 am (Set 4:32 pm)

If you got rid of daylight savings time then the sun would rise at 4:24 am in June and set at 7:31 pm.

(Most people in NY probably want the extra hour of light at 7:31 pm instead of 4:24 am)

If you kept permanent daylight savings then the sun would rise at 7:42 am in December and set at 5:32 pm)

(Most people in NY probably want some light before 8 because it's going to be dark after dinner anyways)

So many people are awake before 8 am compared to 5 am

So many people enjoy the light at 7:30 pm in the summer

Switching really is the sweet spot for NY

Location is definitely important too in hating or liking DST

Ontonagon, Mi sun sets at 5:25 pm tonight (7:58 am rise)

Dexter, Me sun sets at 4:10 pm tonight (6:33 am rise)

Same time zone, both northern cities.

If we didn't get off DST Ontonagon wouldn't see the sunrise until almost 9 am today

People in Dexter might have preferred to stay on DST getting light between 7:33 am to 5:10 pm today

The farther west you live in a time zone the less you like DST generally. Farther east, the more you like it.

Ontonagon is so west it should really be in Central Time zone.

If that was the case then the sun would set at 4:25 pm tonight (6:58 am rise) (basically Dexter ME times)

At that point they might want to stay on DST and it would make it exactly what it was today, sunset at 5:25 pm tonight (7:58 am rise)

[–] mos@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I just think humans don’t work well with such a sudden change even just 1 hr. Maybe there’s a way we could add/remove a minute every day over two months or something lol

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Programmers would be on suicide watch if we did that

[–] mos@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

As I was typing it I was trying to figure out how it would work on electronic devices and my head exploded. Let alone just your everyday clock.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago

They tried permanent DST in the '70s for a few years. People hated it so much we went back to switching the clocks.

[–] Kcap@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That final penny struck is going to sell for a shit ton of money.

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

I'll buy it for two pennies. That's 100% profit for the seller.

[–] henfredemars 74 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Note that the legal framework for phasing out the coin is entirely absent. This was an illegal act as well because only Congress determines what money exists and will be used according to the Constitution.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 10 points 17 hours ago

It still exists and can still be used. They're just not making more of them.

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 9 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

More to the point, it isn't sensible.

A penny lasts decades as a tangible item of currency. I have pennies in my change purse right now that were struck in the 1960's.

The value isn't in how much it costs to make it but in how long it lasts as usable token of trade.

[–] makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world 39 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

How long it lasts as a usable token of trade

So it's still worthless. Genuinely, what can a penny purchase? A nickel? A dime? None of these coins can buy something individually, and a large chunk of the population doesn't carry them because the utility they gain for having exact change is less than the coins are worth

To be clear, I understand the coins vs. bills argument, but I'm personally in favor of cutting all coins up to the quarter. Or cutting all coins except dimes and half dollars, but dimes are annoying coins

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago

Yeah, but like, is it a valuable token of trade? It's 1c, yes that's money, its a whole percent of a dollar, but it's illegal in most of the country to pay someone less than 12.5 of them per minute of labor, an unlivably low wage. The $15/hr wage is increasingly normal for low skilled labor and is a quarter a minute. A quarter is great as you don't need to fill your pocket with it to buy something from a vending machine. Ok that's not the most honest comparison as vending machines haven't taken pennies in at least a decade. It's a denomination sufficiently small to cause a lot of people to just not bother with them, they just aren't worth the time to use them or keep track of them.

[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 12 points 18 hours ago

It just don't make no cents.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 18 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Good, while we're at it we should redecimalize. A coin that can't pay for a significant portion of something is worthless. People used to buy snacks with coins, and like, thats where they thrive. Coins are more expensive than bills but they can change hands a lot more times. A dime for a soda or a cheap snack, maybe a nickel if it's a good deal on a bag of chips is about right.

Like, this isn't even a monetary policy failure, it's just something that should happen every century or two in an inflationary economy with a 5% target.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The rule should be "if you pay with it at a restaurant it should be a coin" because it represents a daily use rather than weekly or monthly and much higher levels of wear and tear.

If not for credit cards we'd probably need $10 coins.

[–] papertowels@mander.xyz 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Zimbabwe has entered the chat

[–] Branch_Ranch@lemmy.world 1 points 34 minutes ago

Those $100,000,000,000,000 bills are fire!

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

i wouldn’t be so sure about this. i still have plenty of pennies and plenty of stamps to put on those pennies.

[–] RunJun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 19 hours ago

Fuck pennies. Even back in the 90s, it was annoying to receive.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 8 points 17 hours ago

When Trumpflation kicks in they'll need to stop minting more denominations too.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 13 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

CGP Grey must be doing the crab dance

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 9 points 18 hours ago (17 children)

Funny thing.

A few days ago I looked through my pockets and found a 1935 penny. Copper pennies were collected and melted down in WW2; the pennies from that era were steel.

It wasn't worth a lot but it was an interesting find. Back in the day, you could buy a cigarette or a newspaper with that penny. I wondered how far it had traveled, and what they'd used it for.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

1943 was the one year they made the zinc plated steel pennies. They've been various ratios of copper before and after (from 88% to 97%) until 1982, when they turned to 97.5% zinc with a 2.5% copper plating.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'll believe it when I stop seeing pennies.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago

They're still there, rotating in my mind.

load more comments
view more: next ›