this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
22 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

59569 readers
1436 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
nooter692@lemmy.ml
AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
22
x86/32bit to try on an old Acer one nettop intel atom CPU N270 @ 1.60GHz 2GB ram (lemmy.ml)
submitted 3 days ago by Babalugats@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I was just given an old nettop from I think around 2010 - An old Acer one nettop intel atom CPU N270 @ 1.60GHz 2GB ram, it has Windows XP on it and it seems fairly smooth/quick, but I haven't done anything other than boot it up and check the spec. I was wondering what would be best to install on it and found that choices are very limited. Linux Lite nor Lubuntu seem to be an option anymore, and almost all of the options I tried under x86_x64 on Distrowatch no longer provide an x86 or 32 bit version. These are the main ones I have seen:

Damn Small Linux (DSL) - https://www.damnsmalllinux.org/

Puppy Linux - https://puppylinux-woof-ce.github.io/

AntiX Linux - https://antixlinux.com/

CachyOS - https://cachyos.org/

Tiny Core Linux - http://www.tinycorelinux.net/

Maybe a couple of others, but could anyone recommend the best option or maybe a couple that would be best and any ideas as to what may be the best use for it? Practicing coding? Just browsing? Etc. I think it may be between DSL and Puppy, but I am hoping to hear any others and will happily try them all. Linux Mint and Debian keep coming up in searches but unless I am missing something, I don't see anything about x86/32bit versions in the latest versions.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hoppolito@mander.xyz 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I was running AntiX out of your list on my old atom eee-pc pretty successfully the last 2-3 years. Was using it as a workbench pc with an old vga screen and keyboard connected, and it worked well enough for simple pdf /datasheet reading and terminal sessions.

For specs, I think it was the same cpu but only 1gb of ram. Honestly with 2gb of ram your options are much broader, the one part you’ll run into trouble with is the browser with multiple tabs anyway. I thought to remember there was also a community-maintained 32bit Archlinux variant?

Edit: https://www.archlinux32.org/ that’s the one I believe. It has a more restricted package repo but otherwise is just Arch.

[–] Babalugats@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Thanks, I created a Ventoy stick with the distros above, and the only one that I can get to run is AntiX. Puppy (Noble _ Bookworm) get the same error as this person (ventoy: not a valid block device), so I will read through that thread. The DSL doesn't respond and Command Line halt error. I think the others were the same. So I am on my 3rd OS creating a bootable USB from ISO, and so far no others have worked either. It may end up AntiX the only option, although I have seen others mention Gentoo - which I thought had stopped support for x86, and a couple of others to try, so I look forward to them :) MX, Q4OS, OpenBSD and Debian.

[–] hoppolito@mander.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

That's a little annoying with all the others not working. Haven't seriously tried most of them so I'm afraid I can't really help you there - though if you ever try Q4OS that others have suggested let me know if it works well cause I may give that a whirl too on the little eee.

If you decide to stick with antix, I could maybe see if I find some of my old notes. I vaguely remember the wifi giving me some trouble and the homebrewed settings panels of the distro can be... a little funky :-)

Good luck!

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 3 points 3 days ago

I have a similar machine from 2011, though it's x64 >> Samsung N150P. I used it as a typewriter for a couple years and I can suggest the same for you if you have such interests. However later I turned it into a homeserver and currently it serves as Pi-hole, Jellyfin, syncthing etc. Without x64, server might be tough but typewriter wouldn't mind. For general daily stuff, it's not really useful.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago

DSL is just AntiX with a curated list of software in a CD image. Just go with AntiX if you want to go that route.

Another option to consider is Q4OS Trinity. Trinity is essentially the KDE 3 desktop which is still surprisingly good and very light on resources.

All of these, including MX Linux, are Debian based and have access to the full Debian repos.

A potential issue with all these Debian based distros though is that Debian itself has moved away from 32 bit in Debian 13. It is hard to say how long these others will stay the course.

Adelie Linux is another one people forget about and certainly worth giving a spin. It is not Debian based.

Tiny Core will be the “fastest” as it runs out of RAM but of course that leaves you even less RAM for other things (like a browser). So it depends on your use case.

Are you sure CachyOS has 32 bit support?

[–] st3ph3n@midwest.social 3 points 3 days ago

x64-compatible CPUs have been the norm for a very long time now, which is why most modern distros have dropped support for older 32-bit x86-only CPUs. Debian dropped it with Debian 13, so anything based on that - think Ubuntu, Mint, and others, would be in the same boat. 2GB of RAM would be pretty performance-limiting on most modern distros too.

That's one of the reasons why things like Tiny Core and Puppy exist, though. Specifically for old/slow-by-today's-standards systems. I haven't used any of them because I'm not running anything that old, and I quite like modern KDE. I saw an Action Retro video on youtube the other day where he got Tiny Core running on a Pentium 133 with 128MB of RAM, lol.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

MX worked really well when I was playing with a few compute sticks recently. I did not do any major comparisons here, just was surprised at how responsive MX was on there.

[–] Babalugats@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Thanks, I think I had messed around with MX a few years ago, but never even thought about it/forgot this time. I will download it now.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 1 points 3 days ago

Same for me, I had forgotten about it and someone mentioned seeing the same series of compute sticks getting mx in a video, and two of the sticks are still running it tbh.

[–] mech@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

I had the exact same use case.
MX Linux was the only thing I could get to boot on this unholy combination of 32bit CPU and UEFI.
It's also a really good distro in general.

[–] vortexal@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

One Linux distro I'm aware of that might be worth checking out is Q4OS. It's a lightweight distro that offers an older but still supported 32bit version.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 2 points 3 days ago

I made the same recommendation. Sadly the “latest” version in 64 bit only. Unsurprising as it is Debian based.

The older release is still available and still supported though. It would be a great option though the clock is ticking on it of course.

The most “batteries included” distro that is I can think of that is not Debian based is Adelie.

[–] Babalugats@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

Thanks, I haven't ever heard of it, I will definitely add that to try, thanks.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It looks like NetBSD and OpenBSD might be good OSs for 32-bit; the next FreeBSD version is dropping support. I don’t use any BSDs, but I think a BSD is probably the best-supported modern Unix operating system for this kind of hardware as the last of the major distros drop i386.

Linux distro support is really thinning out for x86_32, so for this use case; I’m sure the distros still exist, but they’re often niche projects. Gentoo may do the trick if you want to; I can’t tell if they compile their newfangled precompiled packages for i386 though, so if they don’t, you’ll probably have to set up a cross compiling setup from a more powerful x86_64 machine, which you’d need to use every time you update.

[–] Babalugats@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

Thanks, I will definitely be giving them a try. I meant to look at FreeBSD about 15 years ago and was stumped. I have glanced at it over the years since, but never tried it again. I will definitely look at them. Thanks again.

[–] MOARbid1@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago

I had one when they launched, and it was terrible then. I can’t imagine it being better now, but I’m damn interested in that idea being tested!

[–] Peffse@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I just hit the same issue a few days ago. So Debian 12 (Bookworm) still has i386 support, but that support may end as soon as next year as they haven't confirmed i386 as an architecture for LTS.

If you do go with Debian, you can easily choose a lightweight desktop during installation.

[–] Babalugats@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Thanks I will try that. I thought Debian had stopped x86_32 builds. I will definitely try that. 👍

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago

Debian has stopped 32 but in Debian 13. He is talking about Debian 12 which is still supported.

The Debian 12 based version of Q4OS has committed to supporting 32 bit through 2028.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Gentoo

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Complinig everything on that? End me now

[–] TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

If OP is ok using "DIY" distros, there's also Void Linux. It provides binary packages and supports many architectures

x86_64, x86, arm64, armv6, armv7.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You can use bin packages and compile certain things where you'll get preformance. It would be good to have a kernel optimised for that hardware cause you need everything you can get.

You could compile on another PC and but you'd miss the -native optimisation.

For my Chromebook I did a bin kernel then compiled everything else and did bin Firefox. I tried compiling the kernel but ran out of disk space cause only 10 gb of space available.

[–] Babalugats@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

Thanks, will have a look at that option. I haven't even dipped my toes into compiling, but have looked over posts and tutorials in the past.

[–] Babalugats@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Thanks, I will add that. I thought that they had stopped support for x86_32. Happy to be wrong.

[–] nyan@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

Gentoo normally keeps arches for as long as the kernel still supports them, although package testing for some of the rarer ones may be limited. 32-bit Intel is still treated as a major arch and receives the full set of tests and package stabilizations.

Your worst problem is going to be web browsers. Chrome and derivatives don't run on 32-bit, and Firefox is supposed to be dropping support. If Seamonkey follows Firefox, that leaves you with Pale Moon as the only reasonably maintained option.