data1701d

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] data1701d@startrek.website 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

If you scroll down in journalctl, it can go later in time. Also, you can check different boots by changing the b parameter, with -b 0 being the current boot, -b -1 being the previous boot, b -2 being the boot before that, etcetera.

For UFW, I'd just try unblocking the Proton ports if it says they're blocked in Proton settings. Also, check to make sure you don't have two firewalls installed; while this once again shouldn't crash the system, my PC did some very weird things when both UFW and firewalld were installed.

2
submitted 19 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) by data1701d@startrek.website to c/quarks@startrek.website
 

Excerpts from Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Fit 11 that pretty much summarize how the AI industry really works, so long as you swap a few words.

All aboard the AI Event Horizon train. 😭

EDIT: Sorry, I set my Gitlab permissions wrong. Should be able to view now.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 2 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Alright then. That probably eliminates the lp thing. Can I ask: what journalctl command (or logging command in general, if not journalctl) did you use? I'd recommend giving the results of journalctl -b -1 -p 3 and dmesg.

Also, it'd probably be a good idea to tell us what ports are getting blocked; that shouldn't be personally identifying in any way. After doing research on what those ports are and what ProtonVPN requires, try experimenting with unblocking some of them if you can; a blocked port shouldn't crash your system, but it's worth a shot.

I might also recommend looking at a task manager, just to make sure some application isn't taking up all your memory and causing the system to freeze.

Finally, take a look at your CPU temps in case this is some kind of cooling failure.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (5 children)

I don't think it's ProtonVPN, at least not directly, as those happened over 20 minutes before the crash (I'm assuming it happened somewhere around 9:32:30)

That last one looks really odd, and I'm wondering what that kernel module is used for. I'm looking around real quick.

EDIT: Looks like it's for line printers. I'm trying to think why your kernel would randomly load that. Can we see the contents of the following?:

  • /etc/modules-load.d/modules.conf
  • /usr/lib/modules-load.d/modules.conf
  • /usr/local/lib/modules-load.d/modules.conf (if it exists)
  • /run/modules-load.d/modules.conf (if it exists)

Also, can you give us more information about your hardware, just to be sure?

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Interesting project, but not pulling me off XFCE terminal.

The name sounds like a Romulan senator, though.

You're not going to like how I-Chaya the Red-Nosed Sehlat ends...

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, not Santa.

The Red Angel suit.

At least they provide an official Flatpak now.

Also, this isn't an official repository, but https://github.com/palfrey/discord-apt works pretty good for me. If you look at the source code for the fetching script and the Github Workflows, you can see that they just pull directly from the Discord website, and comparing file hashes further confirms it. I no longer use it since the official Flatpak is an option now, but it's still useful.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

“Attempt to calculate answer to your question: Why you want dried leaves in boiling water.”

“Because I happen to like it. That’s why.”

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 1 points 2 days ago

Let’s give him a statuette of Gul Dukat called “National Award for Supreme Attainment in Bajoran Statue Nonextancy”.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 2 points 2 days ago

Although we haven’t really started it yet beyond session 0 yet, the chief medical officer I made in Star Trek Adventures campaign I have with my siblings is a Pandronian who really hates being asked about the three parts thing.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Oh, my gosh. That video is hilarious. Makes the episode 10 times funnier, and it was already beautifully campy to begin with.

And don’t forget the sequel episode in TAS, in which the planet tries to kill them because it’s depressed about its creator dying. Although it’s not as hilarious an episode as the one where Captain Kirk literally defends the human rights of Satan.

 

cross-posted from: https://startrek.website/post/32667508

Alternatively, the whales' musical sequence from the 2005 film.

 

Alternatively, the whales' musical sequence from the 2005 film.

-1
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by data1701d@startrek.website to c/tmbl@lemmy.world
 

EDIT: Switch link from icloud to gitlab.

I think they threw this on their BlueSky or something a few weeks back. If you’re a hard core TMBG fan, you’ve probably seen it elsewhere.

I moreso put this as a reminder this community still technically exists, but honestly, I’m much more active on TMBW Discord, and if you can stand Discord, I honestly recommend it as a very active TMBG fan community.

172
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by data1701d@startrek.website to c/tenforward@lemmy.world
 

cross-posted from: https://startrek.website/post/30091443

Note: I'm not casting all Republicans as a "skin of evil" here; I feel many of them are just people trying to make their way in the world whose daily struggles and fears have been amplified manipulated by the "skin of evil", an administration that constantly denies human rights and demonizes (as well as convinces its followers to partake in the demonization of) people who, for the most part, are also just trying to make their way in the world. I've known Republicans, and while the people they give their support to frighten me, most of the ones I've know aren't demons.

EDIT: To be clear, I’m not saying Republican voters did nothing wrong, that they don’t deserve consequences, or that we should avoid making them feel bad. In many ways, the “skin of evil” is their collective wrongs and the way they enabled the current horrors. The evil, however, is a subset of a person (sometimes almost the whole set, though), while the “skin of evil” is the set of evil. Also, I admit I feel a bit on the availability heuristic and that “most of the ones I know” isn’t the strongest evidence.

51
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by data1701d@startrek.website to c/risa@startrek.website
 

Note: I'm not casting all Republicans as a "skin of evil" here; I feel many of them are just people trying to make their way in the world whose daily struggles and fears have been amplified manipulated by the "skin of evil", an administration that constantly denies human rights and demonizes (as well as convinces its followers to partake in the demonization of) people who, for the most part, are also just trying to make their way in the world. I've known Republicans, and while the people they give their support to frighten me, most of the ones I've know aren't demons.

EDIT: To be clear, I’m not saying Republican voters did nothing wrong, that they don’t deserve consequences, or that we should avoid making them feel bad. In many ways, the “skin of evil” is their collective wrongs and the way they enabled the current horrors. The evil, however, is a subset of a person (sometimes almost the whole set, though), while the “skin of evil” is the set of evil. Also, I admit I feel a bit on the availability heuristic and that “most of the ones I know” isn’t the strongest evidence.

 

In the minute possibly that a TOS continuation were to happen, where should they start from?

Would they go from end of TAS in 2270, or would they start from end of TOS in 2269, overlapping in time with TAS?

In the latter case, I would hope they do it so it’s in-between star dates of TAS to avoid bungling the chronology.

This also opens up the possibility for retelling some TAS episodes; I think most TAS episodes best belong in TAS, with the TAS camp and overall continued TOS storytelling conventions being fundamental to their charm. Live action remakes of a lot of these episodes would probably serve just to strip them of their soul rather than add anything.

The main exception I can think of might be “Yesteryear”; I think having an “extended version” as a full 50 minute episode or even possibly a 2-parter could allow them to add more depth to the story in a way that doesn’t severely break canon, showing more of Spock’s family life and school life as well as Vulcan society in general. I think this is a big story well-suited to newer Trek’s more dramatic storytelling style.

I think the biggest difficulty might be how they would handle young Michael Burnham in this episode. I think the easiest thing to do would be to just say Burnham’s parents were killed in December 2236 and “Yesteryear” happened in January 2237 a couple weeks to a month before Sarek took in Burnham. While I don’t necessarily hate the idea of young Burnham, I think Spock dealing with suddenly having a new adoptive sister would unnecessarily convolute the plot, so my solution works around that. I don’t want Yesteryear to be turned from a coming-of-age and being different story to one about sibling bonding. Then again, maybe they can pull it off and make something good.

What are your thoughts on this? Any other TAS episodes you think could benefit from being adapted into a live action episode?

 

cross-posted from: https://startrek.website/post/29610115

For the two people on Earth who are both Trekkies and Team Starkid fans.

If you don't get this reference, fix yourself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IrxKX44qBJ0

 

For the two people on Earth who are both Trekkies and Team Starkid fans.

If you don't get this reference, fix yourself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IrxKX44qBJ0

 

Well, I just finished DS9 for the 3rd or 4th time, and to offset the despair of the finally, I've turned to an emotional coping rewatch of Lower Decks.

However, I don't necessarily enjoy a lot of the season 1 episodes; thus I often start at S1 E8 "Veritas". I feel like it's one of the first truly good episodes of LD, as its narrative structure is a comedic version of Star Trek's general experimentation with alternate narrative formats a la VOY:"Final Witness" or DS9:"Rules of Engangement", and the humor just generally starts to get better. I also find a bit of genius in the foreshadowing that Tendi is more than she lets on with her combat scenes.

Also, the S1 episodes after that are some of the strongest episodes of the seasons.

What are your thoughts? Where do you tend to start on an LD rewatch?

 

Once by Archer in ENT:"Carpenter Street" (though T'Pol did more of the work), and another by Paris and Tuvok in VOY:"Future'sEnd".

 

No answers like, "They're all from Earth", "They're all in some version of Starfleet or United Earth Fleet", etcetera.

My AnswerAll three have stolen a Dodge-branded car.

In fact, Paris and Archer stole nearly exactly the same kind of blue Dodge Truck, Archer in ENT:"Capenter Street" and Paris in VOY:"Future's End". I found this out while browsing the Memory Alpha facts for the Enterprise episode.


Bonus if you can think of other weird ones.

view more: next ›