this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2025
578 points (99.8% liked)

politics

26327 readers
2736 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 59 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Is anyone else sick to fucking death of reading about all the shit he gets away with? It’s all the headlines are now.

“Nation Shocked As Addled Geriatric Terrorist Does Yet More Illegal And Unconstitutional Shit.”

(Subscribe to our newsletter and get updates on how absolutely nothing is being done about any of it)

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I've been saying all year that I feel like I'm watching a crook break into a bunch of houses, steal everything, and burn the houses down while the police just stand there and say "that's illegal". Trump is on a very blatant crime spree and the people who are supposed to enforce the law are doing nothing except sometimes tell us that what he's doing is illegal

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

Taxing the non-rich to give tax breaks for the rich isn't even outrageous conservatism: it's par for the elitist course. Our own trump-loving cons still preach Pz Reagan's trickle-down theories, and want to secede because we insist they care a little about the plebes.

Paying back their rich friends for bankrolling the campaign is and has been a big part of their platform.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

The benefits of having a massive cult that literally thinks you can do no wrong.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Still waiting for the American people to do something.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They did, they elected him to the presidency.

[–] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 days ago
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

Apathy fuels the machine

[–] Embargo@lemmy.zip 70 points 3 days ago (3 children)

This guy is a genuine monster.

[–] stretch2m@infosec.pub 14 points 3 days ago

Monster doesn't seem like a harsh enough word for what he is.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Sometimes I wonder if Hitler was a similar person. It's hard to know because of how different we see leaders today. It's not just some news article you read or some speech every once in awhile. We get constant exposure and also constant exposure to so many different people talking about them in different ways.

Like, I don't think Trump is like Hitler. Not in the way we think of Hitler from the way he's taught in history. But, materially, he is creating extremely similar results. I don't see Trump as very passionate on his hatred or racism. Like, I think he's more concerned with what being racist and hateful gets him.

I don't know where I was going with this thought. But I guess my point is that it's weird to see a modern day leader implement almost verbatim the same policies and propaganda as the Nazis did. While, idk, being so incredibly, almost, apathetic about it? He seems to be so focused on only what benefits him and gets other rich people to like/respect him. Which is odd, at least in comparison to how we think of fascist leaders of the past. Most being portrayed as extremely passionate about their hatred. Maybe he's just old? His heart seems less in causing pain but more so, apathetic about it, as long as it benefits him in some way.

Edit: reread my comment later and it's obvious now that what I was trying to get to was that history is told outside of class conflict. The important part missing is that the idea of Hitler is this idea of "pure evil" in order to exclude his actions from being connected to the capitalist class and it's interests. It's to treat him as a "special case" and not understand what his material interests aligned with.

This isnt to say Hitler was less bad than portrayed. It is to point out that the great man theory of history is using him as a scapegoat for the interest of the capitalist class and it's concentration in favor of capitalism at that time. Which, well, we are seeing again today.

I think some replies here missed that. Talking about human aspects of Hitler's art or otherwise. Which could easily be said of Trump. I think what is missing is not a personal analysis. It's class analysis. Trump and Hitler's class position align.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I think he might be a worse person than Hitler. He just doesn't have the complete and total control that he did. Yet.

I know it's cliche, but Hitler painted and loved dogs. Trump doesn't have an artistic bone in his body, and by all accounts he hates pets. All pets.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It's late night Lemmy comment time. I made an edit to my comment that replies to all the comments I received in whole. But yours is the main I'd probably reply to. So just giving another response specifically if you care for the response. Can read my edit. Would respect your response. Interested in the "Hitler did human things" response.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah I don't think I can really humanize Hitler all that much lol. Tall order.

He did love dogs, was a vegetarian, and painted. That's all I really know

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

The only thing I've heard about Trump that sounds like he has an ounce of humanity is he has a good relationship with his grandchildren. His granddaughter talked about him at the national convention and he sounded like a pretty normal grandfather

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 5 points 3 days ago

Maybe believing they are passionate in their hatred is what allows us to,sleep at night. If they are blasé about it, then maybe anyone can be hitler.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 days ago

I mean, Hitler at least seemed to be coming at things from a place of misguided patriotism.

Man, I feel gross just writing that out, but I think it's true — I think I respect Hitler more than Trump.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 41 points 3 days ago

Good! The LAST thing I want my Tax Dollars being used for is POOR STARVING AMERICAN CHILDREN when there's BILLION DOLLAR CORPORATIONS that are Upset!

[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's become comical at this point, tax cuts for the wealthy and people screaming "tax the rich". It's going to break.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago

Why do it quietly?

This asshole is throwing hedonistic Gatsby parties, focusing on destroying the WH to build an Epstein ballroom, and fixated on getting a stadium named after him.

[–] webp@mander.xyz 8 points 3 days ago

A true "man of the people," as described by a poor coworker

[–] bruhbeans@lemmy.ml 22 points 3 days ago
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Then America keeps taking it up the ass

[–] n0respect@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Can I at least get a reach-around?

[–] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 days ago

Maybe a protest in about 3 to 4 months will get him shaking in his boots?

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Surely the supreme court will step in and stop this, too?

afterall, if we have to stop SNAP payments because of the debt, then surely tax breaks for the rich, which would make debt even worse, must also be blocked immediately and without hesitation..right?

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

You'd think

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Since when does her do anything quietly?