this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2025
541 points (96.2% liked)

News

35724 readers
2595 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Last Tuesday, as the strongest Atlantic storm in 90 years slammed the western coast of Jamaica with 185-mph winds, Bill Gates was downplaying climate change.

The billionaire does not appear to have publicly addressed the disaster in Jamaica, which extended throughout the Caribbean, with Melissa having killed dozens across Cuba, Haiti, the Bahamas, and the Dominican Republic. And his overall point, frankly, does not hold up to scrutiny.

Gates isn’t alone; climate change has slipped down the world’s priority list in the past few years—and it shows. Governments and corporations are shelving emissions goals, budgets are being redirected from climate initiatives to warfare, the media is pivoting away from climate journalism, and even activists are urging a softer, more “hopeful” tone. It all signals a vibe shift in how we talk about climate change, reframing it from the existential risk it actually poses to a less urgent, peripheral issue—even as the floodwaters reach our front doors.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 149 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Why respectfully? Who has Bill Gates shown actual respect for?

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 115 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 53 points 3 months ago

ok good point

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 26 points 3 months ago

Yeah. Shut the fuck up, Bill.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 77 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Gates does not need to “shut up”. He needs to testify as to what his relationship is with Epstein.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 57 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

Respectfully, Bill Gates is complicit in genocide and should be investigated for his connections with Epstein.

[–] gressen@lemmy.zip 20 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Fact Check: List of claims about Bill Gates includes falsities

Not to defend the guy but there are enough real skeletons in his closet. We don't need to spread misinformation.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 52 points 3 months ago

Disrespectfully, Bill Gates needs to shut the fuck up

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 42 points 3 months ago (11 children)

Nah, not respectfully, bill Gates is a piece of shit who has spent millions in charities to pretend he's a nice guy.

I too can pretend to be really nice by slamming millions around even though I have acted like a shit stain before.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 10 points 3 months ago

i once tried to question him when he did an AMA like a decade ago, the mods/filters dint allow it though,specifically about him money laundering.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] cycadophyta@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Fuck Bill. Let's throw him in the volcano with the other elites

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 18 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That's wasteful. Pit them against each other in death matches.

[–] cycadophyta@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

We WILL have the Zuck vs Elon match after all

load more comments (1 replies)

I LIKE THIS IDEA

[–] etherphon@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe there is hope for a world where being rich doesn't mean you are assumed to be wise and all knowing and should be consulted on everything.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean… looking at people like Neil deGrasse Tyson, you don’t need to be super rich for people to give your intelligence too much credit.

[–] etherphon@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

He's definitely a very smart man, in his field, but yeah that doesn't translate to having the answers to everything or even having common sense sometimes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 28 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

Irrespectfully most tech moguls need to shut the fuck up, especially about shit that has nothing to do with tech

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 12 points 3 months ago

he was always known to be ruthless during his ceo days, his current image is trying to reinvent, and also to soften the blow of him being associated with epstein.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Poayjay@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I remember when he did an AMA on Reddit and every comment about his Epstein connection was instantly buried.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

~~Respectfully~~, Bill Gates Needs to Shut Up

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 3 months ago

~~Respectfully~~, Bill Gates Needs to Shut the Fuck Up

[–] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 25 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Bill Gates is a monopolist whose shady business practices in the 90s and 2000s make him a very evil man.

[–] minkymunkey_7_7@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (4 children)

All billionaires are inherently evil by their own nature. Unless they literally won the lottery with take home $1 billion.

To become a billionaire you have to do some dark Machiavellian deeds whether by exteeme exploitation of human labour or manipulation of the most unethical proportions. A billion in wealth is something quite unimaginable before the 20th century, and the means to obtain that level of wealth in history has always been dark and dirty.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

This is libelous. His business practices were also shady in the '70s and '80s.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 months ago (2 children)

High-school dropout nepo-baby Bill Gates? That one?

[–] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The guy that stole IBMs UI setup and made Windows?

[–] gahedros@lemmy.today 19 points 3 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 3 months ago

But what about my good billionaire? :( /s

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Don't ask whether it's distraction from Epstein list, ask whether everything bad is distraction from climate change and wealth inequality.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hegar@fedia.io 17 points 3 months ago

Maybe he should stop raping children, aiding genocide and supporting climate deniers instead of treating philanthropy like a pre-reformation nobleman buying indulgences to get into heaven?

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 17 points 3 months ago

He never should have spoken on the first place.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Gates often gets a pass because he gives away a lot of money and "advocates" for a wealth tax. But he's still a billionaire and still hoards more resources and power than any single person could ethically possess.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Might I add, also disrespectfully.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 months ago

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

[–] harsh3466@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 months ago

Respectfully, Bill Gates is a piece of shit.

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He should only take advice from Balmer. And to be clear, the cocaine Balmer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Ladies and gentlemen and others, this is what they call "the good billionaire"!

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 months ago

Forcefully.
Permanently.
Respectfully? Don't care.

[–] setnof@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That guy that told me to sell my GameStop shares and that investing in that company is gambling? Yeah just shut the fuck up already!

[–] hanrahan@piefed.social 8 points 3 months ago

He can blather as mich as he wants, stop giving the douche air time or column inches ffs.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

~~Donny~~ Billy, you’re out of your element!

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Bill Gates now openly towing the WEF propaganda line which KurzGesagt produced for him earlier. This is so expected.

To understand the situation see https://youtu.be/ZRPcyWNfgxo

load more comments
view more: next ›