Ask Lemmy

I don't see the benefit of the extra level of indirection. Why not just hire a housekeeper to do the same work better without the unnecessary $20k telepresence platform? Sure, it might benefit the creators in harvesting subsidized motion and interaction data that they can later use to cut humans out of the loop, but what's the benefit to the customers paying for it?

Literally just slavery with extra steps. You can be damned sure those extra steps exist solely to keep the poor at a distance and the robots are gimped so they can't be used against the rich slavers.

It's the worst in everyway imaginable. I cannot comment on it's capabilities, but the fact that it records the environment and can be taken over by a remote worker is simply too much.

I'll call it an arthouse short film until I see at least one home movie/unboxing thing showing how janky any new product really is, and maybe still after that. I can't see a project like this having gotten to anywhere near that level without it being widely talked about.

Lots of fun ways for it to go wrong if it is real though. 'Pardon me while I tidy your credit cards with my camera eyes.' 'I told the robot to jerk me off and it ripped my balls off instead because it's actually some 15 year old boy in a VR headset.' 'I told the robot to clean my living room while i took a shower, but it came and stared at me naked and wouldn't let me leave, because it's actually a 15 year old boy in a VR headset.' 'I got an alert that my robot slave had to go into pilot mode because a person arrived, so I pulled up the feed and got a POV video of it object-raping my sister.' 'I told the robot to feed my hamster and my cat, but it decided to feed my hamster to my cat, which may have been because of an error in language processing or because it's actually a 15 year old boy in a VR headset.'

Wee, living on the edge of cyberpunk dystopia!

Looks like the beginning to a Black Mirror episode.

Humanoid robot is a bad engineering design anyway.

My god what a horrible ad. Everything from the people to the robot seems like bad acting. The girl trying to juke the bot out was hilarious

...is NEO anatomically correct? Can I upload my AI waifu into it?

Everything I see the robot do in this video falls into one of two categories: enabling people to be even bigger lazy, entitled pieces of shit or kind of a stretch for its level of dexterity.

I can only see this as a scam that will have no real practical use and dies out after about 2 years.

This thing is gonna start so many fires

I guess it's cheaper than a full time live in maid?

The robot in that thumbnail has already seen some horrors

The very first thought when I saw the photo of it:

I am Groot!

wow_mao did a good breakdown on this in his most recent video.

but on a more serious one: marques bownlee made a level headed video on this: he noticed only 2 basic tasks like opening the door and bringing a cup to the kitchen were done automatically in the clip, everything else shown in the clip was a remote controlled robot. it's ai needs to learn A LOT of things, like different fabrics, how to stack dishwashers, how to even differentiate forks from knives... now every household has it's individual items and so on. he compared it to teslas self driving which was actively beta tested by the users and learned this way. but roads are far less complex than a household. and tesla works because they sold millions of cars while this robot will be a 20.000$ beta test for a small amount of people and it has to learn a lot of different thinks on a significantly smaller userbase. then there's privacy: you have a walking robot in your household which records stuff and sends the data to a server outside of the user's control.

basically it's a tech bro pipedream.

nice video though.

So, i CAN'T fuck it?