Air is on fire.
...
Unless the fire was in space I suppose - which can't happen, so yeah, air is always on top of fire.
Edit: nope, I was wrong. Air is not always on top of fire :-P.
this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2025
421 points (98.2% liked)
memes
18263 readers
3532 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
What about chemicals that create their own oxygen source when burning?
The reaction propagation is always from the ignition source to the media, so the 'fire' is always on the outside. Even if the inside is in the process of quickly becoming the outside.
No, I get that. Not why I asked the question.
If you have a compound like potassium super oxide chatch light in a vacuum, does it still burn because it has it's own oxidizer?
By itself in a vacuum, no. Under gas pressure, when contacted by water it will react from the point of contact until all reactants are complete. I wouldn't consider the reaction to be 'fire' though. At least not personally. Drop some hydrocarbons in the mix and you'll get a fire as the oxygen produced gets something to react with.
Speaking from experience with Potassium Superoxide, once it goes up the flames are impressive in atmosphere.
I would absolutely expect that to be true. Generate enough oxygen, and damn near everything suddenly wants to be a gas that's paired with it.
obligatory at this point:
https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/things-i-won-t-work-dioxygen-difluoride
Nah, foof doesn't burn, it's destroys everything around it with hatred for the universe that made it exist.
Yes, that is how rockets get to space, for example. Earth's atmo is ~21% Oxygen. So that is giving flames a boost. Careful not conflate "burn" with the presence of flames. In a vacuum, the flame could only exist briefly because there isnt the available Oxygen from the air. The reaction will (or might?) still happen, but without the oxygen to produce a flame.
BTW, this has been studied in microgravity aboard the ISS.
Excellent point. I edited my comment to say that air is not always on top of fire:-D.
That's nothing, in Scandinavia it's "there is fire in things".
Maybe the dutch partly learned from the vikings because we do it the other way around: "The thing is in fire!"
Fire is the energy emitted from converting the molecules to carbon
Converting the hydrocarbons to CO2 and H2O, yes.
Also, just found out that the red and yellow "flames" are actually heated soot that's glowing, like metal glows when heated. That's why "hotter" fires glow blue, that's actually the chemical of the gasses burning and less soot is being produced. That's why it's counter intuitive why colder flames glow brighter than hotter ones.
A hot air balloon is kind of on fire, at least when the burner is running
My mum says I'm fire
Yeah but then where is shorty fire burning?
Fire blanket, it’s briefly “on” fire, until it isn’t anymore. Or until fire is on it too. Fire blankets are the liminal spaces of fire.
If fire is on my ass hair then isn’t my ass on fire?
Is fire even a thing or just, like, a symptom? Like shadow and cold don't actually exist, they just describe the absence of light and heat respectively. 🤔
Fire is essentially a name for a chemical reaction. So it's probably more accurate to say "thing is undergoing fire"
I think it would make more sense to say "thing is firing", similar to how we say "thing is freezing" or "thing is falling"