this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2025
256 points (98.1% liked)

News

36891 readers
2461 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The memo also appears to contradict the department’s shutdown plan released in late September, when it referred to the contingency fund as part of its SNAP plan.

“Congressional intent is evident that SNAP’s operations should continue since the program has been provided with multi-year contingency funds that can be used for State Administrative Expenses to ensure that the State can also continue operations during a Federal Government shutdown,” the shutdown plan said. “These multi-year contingency funds are also available to fund participant benefits in the event that a lapse occurs in the middle of the fiscal year.”

The Agriculture Department said Friday it can’t use a special reserve fund to pay food stamp benefits during the partial government shutdown because the money is meant to be used when appropriations fall short, not when the funding doesn’t exist.

I'd argue the source below is higher quality but got moderated for being substack:

https://mander.xyz/post/40669009/22934422

all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 77 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Unlimited funds to harm you, none to help you. You better believe this is class war, and we're losing badly.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 23 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Because most people either don't know the war's started, or are in denial about needing to do something about it.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well half the fuckers actually believe their on the side of the capitalists!!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 54 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So glad there is money to tackle and disappear brown people, but not money to feed people.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 22 points 5 months ago

We have plenty of money to feed everyone. Those just aren't the right kind of American these days.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago

Remember that they're splitting hairs to starve poor people here, but illegally raiding R&D money to pay the military

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 27 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Republicans really want food riots.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Their goal is anything violent to trigger the insurrection act. That’s part of why they were so pissed off that No Kings was peaceful. So now they’re going for the food.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They're gonna get it, in a serious way. I don't think there's enough troops to take on this many pissed people living in cities and such.

Most substation power transformers take years to replace, and are only protected by chain link fences.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

that's because the fence is there to protect you, not the transformer.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Bit of armor piercing isn't going to do the oil-filled housing much good..

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

But why would the gov care if you are without power? The ones they need will be well protected.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not saying it's logical. Individuals are smart, people are blah blah blah..

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well I am saying it won't deter the gov in anyway.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

At some point, if enough of the grid were damaged, the remaining bits would get overloaded.

Soldiers in unlit urban corridors should be expected to do worse in their mission, nevermind all the added chaos.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They will just use generators. I mean seriously, the military can deploy to places like Afghanistan and iraq, where I am sure they had no power until they took over the power facilities and such. They can handle power without a grid just fine.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Supply lines, drones, and how difficult powering entire city blocks off generators is..

Let's end this discussion with a simple point: several hundred dollars for a gun and AP rounds means the military is suddenly responsible for partially powering a surrounding area, with their "enemies" (we the people) made dramatically harder to see at night.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Your simple point isn't the mic drop you think it is. You seem to think this administration would care about maintaining order in every city block through the night. They would create green zones for themselves with power and such, but the rest would be on thier own each night, and probably only minorly managed during the day even. Workers and whoever they need would have to go through security to get into the green zones to work for food. This playbook has already been written and perfected over centuries.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No mic drop was attempted. Armchair debates about how things would work out are similarly pointless.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I will agree that historical data is not always an accurate predictor of future events. But in this case we are talking not about what will happen, but about would the administration's future actions be influenced by the possibility of people attacking transformers. It is reasonable to say that in the past, similar administration's didn't worry about similar things, so it is unlikely that the current administration will either.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 20 points 5 months ago

The government is doing a lot of things it "can't" do. This is one of those times I would say "do it anyway, and worry about the consequences later", because it's objectively a net help for people.

[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I originally used this source and I think its higher quality (but substack so got moderated):

https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/p/october-25-2025

Yesterday the Trump administration said it would not use any of the approximately $6 billion the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) holds in reserve to fund the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

the shutdown plan the USDA released in late September. Then, it said: “Congressional intent is evident that SNAP’s operations should continue since the program has been provided with multi-year contingency funds that can be used for State Administrative Expenses to ensure that the State can also continue operations during a Federal Government shutdown. These multi-year contingency funds are also available to fund participant benefits in the event that a lapse occurs in the middle of the fiscal year.”

Today, in yet another violation of the Hatch Act that prohibits the use of government resources for partisan ends, the USDA Food and Nutrition Service website reads: “Senate Democrats have now voted 12 times to not fund the food stamp program, also known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Bottom line, the well has run dry. At this time, there will be no benefits issued November 01. We are approaching an inflection point for Senate Democrats. They can continue to hold out for healthcare for illegal aliens and gender mutilation procedures or reopen the government so mothers, babies, and the most vulnerable among us can receive critical nutrition assistance.”

at the same time the Department of Agriculture says it cannot spend its $6 billion in reserves to address the $8 billion needed for SNAP in November, the administration easily found $20 billion to prop up right-wing Trump ally Javier Milei in Argentina.

[–] callouscomic@lemmy.zip 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They'll shuffle money to pay their fucking military though. Bootlicking twats.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Starve the poors, extra salt on the wound for farmers

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Whatever makes things worse