this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
684 points (94.4% liked)

Political Memes

11519 readers
2101 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 65 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] beejboytyson@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I think a gayer Harris would have been less repulsive.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 4 points 6 months ago

For some reason, my tired brain read DCU. And I guess it's still made kind of sense.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 30 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"You have won photograph of glorious leader. But since property is theft, you must go to jail now."

"Fair enough."

[–] dumbass@aussie.zone 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I think dogs should be the only ones allowed to be billionaires.

[–] sefra1@lemmy.zip 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

No pitbull island pls

[–] lennee@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

the real question is if we only let dogs vote would we get something better or worse than what we have now

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Depends on how you present the voting options. If it ends up being random selection of human representatives then you've just reinvented sortition and that is generally better than most of what we've got.

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I dunno, feel like its better than random. When my dog didn't like someone, there usually ended up being a good reason. Might be onto something with the dog voting system.

[–] lennee@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

yeah i would have strict rules to not wiggle treats and toys in their face but generally you should have to pass the dog vibecheck

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

Politicians will learn to take advantage of dog biases too.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I would like to leave my money to half a billionaire. Caveat: that half cannot be connected to any other half. Also I get to decide if we're talking mass, surface area, number of bones, or something else whichever is most advantageous to me.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Now THAT'S a reality-style estates sale show I could get into.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] NeilBru@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (2 children)

No lives matter and that's a fact.

  • Cthulhu
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

"Ph'nglui mglw'nafh wgah'nagl fhtagn"

[–] primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] NeilBru@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I oppose treating people as expendable in everyday life, but in the grand scheme of things, the truth is that we are mayflies buzzing about how much "our lives matter".

We only matter to the others that know us, and then, perhaps not even that much.

Time humbles all.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago
[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 6 months ago

That's the problem with leftism these days. All they do is oppose the right, saying no etc. It would be a lot stronger if instead we provide a well constructed alternative instead. Don't vote for what you don't want but vote for what you want.