A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
But its ok. We are making adults provide ID so they can access adult material theyre legally allowed to access- UK government.
Guardian minimises Israeli genocide while holding Russia to account as it should
Are we talking like actual porn on tiktok or just women dancing in bikinis? Because one of those used to be called the MTV channel, and the other was always being accessed by teens with a few clicks.
The difference I suppose is deliberately looking for it vs the algorithm feeding it to them
Daily reminder to stop using TikTok 🤗
applies to most for profit social media
applies to ~~most~~ all for profit social media
One more lever to force age verification / personal identification of users.
The problem is that they're being served adult content despite the site knowing they're underage, so age verification wouldn't help at all... If anything, this is a demonstration as to why age verification isn't a good solution.
If anything, this is a demonstration as to why age verification isn't a good solution.
Won't stop surveillance state bad actors from arguing exactly the opposite, though.
You're absolutely right, but it's not like facts matter anymore in this regard.
How about you force age responsible onto the parents? Or at least tax them.
i mean, yeah, but also kids are going to figure out how to get on the more accessible parts of the internet that we really would prefer they don't go on. there's part of me that thinks yeah, make a law but make it toothless, so you have to earn your porn. learn how to vpn or tor or whatever. computer illiteracy is a problem.
With this kind of thing there needs to be more help than that, because there isn't social consensus (yet) around keeping kids away from personalised-algorithm-controlled services. That means there is intense pressure on parents to let their kids use tiktok, instagram and so on, and if they resist that pressure they're forcing their child into isolation from the socialising that's going on on these platforms.
There are two acceptable options I see, but both require societal change which probably can't happen without top-down intervention:
(It may be that 1 is the only acceptable option but I haven't seen anything robust on the harms so far).
"Forcing age responsible" (if I understand that...) onto parents is no use if they do the right thing and make sure their kid's account is marked as under 18 but it then receives mature content anyway.
I dns block TikTok and they kids aren’t allowed on any meta properties. I expect that there will be more pushback in the next couple years.
My challenge truly is figuring out how to arm them to be able to process and critically evaluate social media without exposure to it. Truth in andvertising, and recently AI.
Increasingly I think that it’s a matter of educating them about the risks, like drugs and alcohol. As if that works, unfortunately.
Increasingly I think that it’s a matter of educating them about the risks, like drugs and alcohol. As if that works, unfortunately.
i mean just because our generations (i'm assuming you're somewhere within 20 years of me) completely fucked that up via overexaggerating risks doesn't mean we have to do that to the next ones. we can fuck up in our own special way.
Teach them mechanisms of psychological control and propaganda–how-to, so they recognize when it happens.
That’s the new MAGA feature
I'm shocked! Shocked!
Anyone remember when tiktok was called musically? It was basically a dispo for pedos
I didn't think that this needed to be said, but I suppose it does.
IT IS NOT OK TO FUCK CHILDREN,PULL YOUR DICK OUT AND DO STUFF TO THEM WITH IT OR MAKE THEM DO STUFF WITH YOUR DICK. IT IS NOT OK TO LURE KIDS IN WITH THE END GOAL OF FUCKING OR MOLESTING THEM. THIS IS VERY BAD AND YOU SHOULD NEVER DO IT. RICH WHITE PEOPLE, THIS IS MAINLY FOR YOU.
There, I hope that helps.
While I agree with your statement, that's not really what this article is about.
I do tend to get off topic.
Hentai is just Japanese cartoons, right? RIGHT???