this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2025
669 points (98.5% liked)

Science Memes

16945 readers
4147 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In the top case has it been arbitrarily decided to include space in between the would-be victims? Or is the top a like number line comparison to the bottom? Because if thats the case it becomes relevant if there is one body for every real number unit of distance. (One body at 0.1 meter, and at 0.01 meter, at 0.001, etc)

If so then there's an infinite amount of victims on the first planck length of the bottom track. An infinite number of victims would contain every possible victim. Every single possible person on the first plank length. So on the next planck length would be every possible person again.

Which would mean that the bottom track is actually choosing a universe of perpetual endless suffering and death for every single possible person. The top track would eventually cause infinite suffering but it would take infinite time to get there. The bottom track starts at infinite suffering and extends infinitely in this manner. Every possible version of every possible person dying, forever.

Bottom. Greater probability that it gets stuck in the corpses.

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I masturbate until I forget about the decision I have to make and then put off cleaning my apartment until I finally just run out, randomly pull the lever, and never think of the consequences again.

Of course by that point everyone has already starved to death which is the worst possible outcome.

[–] moody@lemmings.world 2 points 1 day ago

Ah, procrasturbation.

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

What about a time loop where only one person dies, but infinite times?

This is why it is important to only hire union trolley operators. They are trained to stop the trolley.

[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Doesn't matter, there are not enough people to try this anyway

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

Depends on the speed of the trolley.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Not with that attitude

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Imagine being the first one being killed on any of these tracks.

The probability of that is...?

Mathematicians tell me, please, because my mind is breaking.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

like the infinite monkeys with typewritters, universal limits to the rescue. Trolley's are slow. Each bump makes them slower. Some of the people in the discrete line will have long lives until an excruciatingly painful death from dehydration.

[–] CommissarVulpin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Okay, so what’s the point of “proving” that there some “infinities” are “bigger” than others? What’s the practical application here? Because an infinite hotel with an infinite number of guests is physically impossible, so I don’t see the point.

[–] carmo55@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

A practical application is for example in probability theory (or anywhere that deals with measures) such as this question:

If we generate a random real number from 0 to 1, what is the probability that it is rational?

Because we know that the continuum is so much larger in a sense than the set of rationals, we can answer this confidently and say the probability is zero, even though it is theoretically possible for us to get a rational number.

Statistics deals with similar scenarios quite frequently, and without it we wouldn't have the modern scientific method.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago

Practical application in math tends to be like three degrees of separation and half a century removed from the math at play. In this case, all of modern mathematics is based on set theory, so it's more that this stuff allows us to do other, more practically useful math while knowing what we're talking about.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Geez, disconnect the trains so you can hit both lines at the same time, obviously.

[–] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

Like everything else in this holographic universe we live in, I’d just close my eyes and believe the bodies I’m trampling are imaginary.

[–] OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Can I group the people into groups of 1, then 2, then 3 and so forth? When the trolley is done with the killing, it will have killed -1/12 people.

[–] p3n@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I do what I always do: run to the trolley, then jump up and pull the emergency stop because I hate false dilemmas.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›