506
submitted 1 year ago by Nusm@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] rustyfish@lemmy.world 122 points 1 year ago

Just to get a feeling of how fucking dumb I think you are if you actually stand behind this dumbass.

After several recent gaffes — including getting Sioux City, Iowa, mixed up with Sioux Falls, South Dakota, in a speech last week as he drummed up support ahead of the Iowa primary — Mr Trump took fewer missteps in his Florida address.

But he did again repeat that Victor Orban's Hungary bordered on Russia, which it does not. The countries are about 1,000 kilometres apart at their closest point.

In a previous speech, he said Mr Orban was the leader of Turkey.

You think that’s a great choice to lead anything? It’s not even funny to make fun of you, because you are literally mentally handicapped.

[-] lickmygiggle@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

I would bet my actual life that asshole didn’t win Massachusetts.

[-] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 29 points 1 year ago
[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

"So what you're saying is that I really won Massachusetts by 65% and they just flipped the Biden and Trump votes!"

  • Trump, likely.
[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 11 points 1 year ago

Please let him say this. I'm sure Dominion and Smartmatic would love to rehash their legal arguments with Trump as the defendant.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 72 points 1 year ago

“ I don’t get it. They say I lost but I won the most states. All the states, 53 in all. The greatest victory ever and they stole it from me, from you. The greatest victory by the greatest president!”

[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 70 points 1 year ago

It's very sad that I can't tell if this quote is real or not

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago

Yeaaah... I mean after "Defending our airports from the British in 1776" and "I was there in New York on 7/11"

Wouldn't put it past him

[-] espentan@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Haha, I had to go back and watch that one again.

After he says "our army manned the air" it for a second could seem like he realized his mistake, then he doubles down and talks about how "it took over the airports".

Source

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.de 35 points 1 year ago

ChatGPT hallucinates less than Trump.

Neurosyphilis is wild

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago

Whenever Trump utters a new completely bogus lie, I don’t think about him at all. Instead I think about his voters and wonder if there is any falsehood he could utter that would cause them to change their minds about him. It’s still hard for me to accept the idea that so many people think this is acceptable behavior in the final analysis. I know many Trump voters say that they don’t like Trump or approve of his lies, but they still claim he’s better than any Democrat due to his policies and strident action to support them. It really is a strong man appeal, and none of them seem to be able to see how letting this become the new precedent for their party will damage not just the Republican platform in the long run but the entire American political system.

I can see a future in which Gen Z or their children elect a similarly unhinged president who tries to ban organized religion or selectively deny federal funding to red states or some other nonsense. When the shoe is on the other foot, oh the cries of injustice these same Trumpers will make.

We are all so fucked. Glad my life is already 50% over. Future generations have my condolences.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Instead I think about his voters and wonder if there is any falsehood he could utter that would cause them to change their minds about him.

Exactly: the point of this kind of blatantly outrageous lie isn't actually to try to convince anybody of anything; it's to act as a fascist purity test. The goal is to force everyone either to sink deeper into the cult of personality by knowingly accepting and thus sharing in the lie, which introduces even more cognitive dissonance and makes it that much harder for them to break free in the future, or to out themselves as an enemy so that they can be purged.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

...president who tries to ban organized religion or selectively deny federal funding to red states...

Now this is a platform I can support!

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] 4am@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

wonder if there is any falsehood he could utter that would cause them to change their minds about him

“Hillary Clinton is actually a good person.”

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RubberStuntBaby@kbin.social 52 points 1 year ago

Somehow there are people who don't feel like Trump is insulting their intelligence with the whoppers he tells.

"He's saying exactly what I want to hear! Of course it's true!"

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Conservatives are not intelligent enough to have their intelligence insulted.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

What intelligence

[-] Reptorian@lemmy.zip 51 points 1 year ago
[-] TheFriar@lemm.ee 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Like…it’s been fuckin YEARS you pathetic sad sack. No one gives a fuck anymore. Even his own supporters aren’t as gung ho because…it’s been fuckin years. It’s hard to get people excited to vote for you when you won’t shut the fuck up about the election four goddamn years ago.

[-] darth_helmet@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago

To be fair, I still bitch about the 2000 election, and I’m not even Al Gore

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Truth doesn’t matter. Truth is their enemy.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 26 points 1 year ago

HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA from a state that Republicans never win

[-] NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Considering he knew exactly how many votes he needed to win Georgia, couldn't this be used against him in court?

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 year ago

I wonder at which point of his ridiculous lies Republican voters will (secretly?) clue in.

[-] ares35@kbin.social 36 points 1 year ago

no need to waste brain cycles wondering.

they won't.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RubberStuntBaby@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Rejecting reality in favor of their leader's claims, no matter how ridiculous, is how fascist prove their loyalty.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

I'd like to point out that even Ronald Fucking Reagan didn't win all 50 against Mondale. He lost Minnesota.

"Reagan won a landslide re-election victory, carrying 525 electoral votes, 49 states, and 58.8 percent of the popular vote. Mondale won 13 electoral votes from the District of Columbia, which has always voted overwhelming for the Democratic candidate, and his home state of Minnesota by a 0.18% margin."

[-] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Imagine a Republican winning Minnesota.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

He won every state as long as you don't count all of the states he lost.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] clutchmatic@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Interesting how politicians can say absolutely whatever they want even if that undermines the integrity of the country they want to rule over

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 10 points 1 year ago

could someone [in the court process] request a mental evaluation to determine if he is even competent to be found guilty? hes clearly off his rocker, and a potential danger to himself and others!

[-] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

This will happen if sentencing involves jail time.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

They already did that and he passed it with flying colors! "Person, woman, man, camera, TV."

[-] Iwasondigg@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago

Fucking delusional.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
506 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19097 readers
1138 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS