819
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 182 points 1 year ago

Thankfully no guns were hurt during the incident.

-Republicans probably

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 40 points 1 year ago

The problem is there wasn't a nearby cop that could have shot everyone, that would have sold the problem.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

This is so American. From the availability of firearms, to their immediate use upon a perceived threat, to the economic situation that would have him evicted, to the insane sentence of 100 years for a 66 year old who needs an oxygen tank. Just sad all around.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't think 100 years is insane, it's life without parol without actually saying it. He shot two people tried to shoot another and actually killed the youngest.

Other countries don't follow the punitive approach to criminal law, but rather a reformative. With the facts we are presented with it actually seems more like a failure of society instead of just one man. The sentence is absolutely ridiculous.

[-] TheGreenGolem@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There are cases to reform somebody, and I fully agree that we must try that. In some cases. Which this is absolutely not.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MudSkipperKisser@lemmy.world 113 points 1 year ago

It’s okay, just now on the news I saw that a man successfully shot and killed his 21 year old son, so the universe is now balanced.

[-] Baines@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago

clearly this 8 year old and that 21 year old should have been packing

[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago

Obviously. The solution is always more guns.

[-] weew@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

the only thing that can stop a bad senior with a gun is a good toddler with a gun

load more comments (1 replies)

Not really. Going to need a 8yo girl to shoot a boomer now

[-] Wirrvogel@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago

Will two 5 y.o. that shot their grandmothers by accident do?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 100 points 1 year ago

Why didn't the 8 year old have a gun to defend herself with? That's the only thing that could have saved her life!

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] elbucho@lemmy.world 96 points 1 year ago

So this article makes it seem like he's got dementia and was under the spell of a delusion when shooting his partner & daughter. But it's written so vaguely that it's hard to know for sure. So I found another article that seems to be much more clear about what happened:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/who-is-tony-louis-valez-father-sentenced-to-100-years-in-prison-for-killing-daughter-while-shooting-wife-and-son/ar-AA1jkw2q

TL;DR: 66-year-old man is in rough shape; has Hepatitis B, Emphysema, and COPD, and needs an oxygen tank. His partner (a much younger woman), their daughter together (8 years old), and his son from a previous marriage (18) all came to his house. The article doesn't say what happened in the conversation, but he apparently became enraged thinking they were trying to get him out of the house. My guess is that they were trying to get him to go into a care facility due to his many, many ailments.

Dude saw red, grabbed a gun, and started blasting. Shot his partner, then tried shooting his son, missed, and hit his 8-year-old daughter in the back as she was running away from him.

So it sounds much less like dementia (though that could still very well be a factor), and more like a miserable piece of shit reaching for a gun first to solve all of his problems.

[-] clutch@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago

Paradoxically he ended up in a sort of care facility. Some "care" but maybe not the care he needed

[-] kraftpudding@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Honestly, the facto that he could have had dementia and still could access a gun is not really the better option, is it?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

It can be both, though. He could be a sack of shit who is now going through dementia.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Spacebar@lemmy.world 93 points 1 year ago
[-] remotelove@lemmy.ca 81 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fuck religion, alcohol, politics, financial inequality, unaffordable health care and brain dead sports fans.

[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 28 points 1 year ago

Yes, but fuck guns extra hard.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] nl4real@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Seems kinda dangerous.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 76 points 1 year ago

wtaf?

Valez believed that two women had come to the house to evict him and he lost his temper

so… how did that relate to his partner and son?

so confused

[-] Baines@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

daughter in law and his partner were the two women maybe?

article is kinda bad

yet another shining example of the kind of quality republican needed to prove the value of the second amendment

load more comments (35 replies)
[-] ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone 62 points 1 year ago

Boomers don't need guns.

Dementia + lethal weapons. Terrible combination.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 year ago

Pretty much no one in rich countries need guns these days, no matter the generation.

[-] ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 year ago

It's really depressing. Yesterday I packed out an order for a hidden magnetic gun holder.

Like great. That is wonderful. Someone out there, possibly a paranoid deranged asshole, wants to keep a presumably loaded gun under their bedside table or desk...

load more comments (80 replies)
[-] Baines@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

don’t forget drugs, tons of drugs

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] LollerCorleone@kbin.social 59 points 1 year ago

I am confused by the way this is reported. Did he mistake his son and his ex-partner to be officers who had come to evict him and shoot at them? Or did he hold them responsible for his looming eviction?

Anyway, US really need better gun control. Looks like any nutjob can get a gun there. It is tragic to see a young life ending this way.

[-] lmaydev@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

Also the fact a mentally healthy person can snap in the heat of the moment.

If there's a gun nearby that can be all it takes.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Stanard@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

A quote from the judge according to the article:

"I just can't believe being evicted would justify picking up a handgun in that small of a space with children present"

What I find particularly concerning about this is that this implies that being evicted would justify picking up a handgun provided you're not in an enclosed space with children present. Why in the actual fuck would there be any further qualification after "I just can't believe being evicted would justify picking up a handgun". Full stop. You're being evicted. You fucked up. Firearms don't belong in that conversation at all with the only possible exception I can think of being if you are being directly and illegally threatened with a firearm.

Ugh.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 year ago

They were just listing all of the reasons why it was a bad idea, not qualifying each reason as "okay if the other ones didn't occur".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago

I can fully see your inference, but don't believe that the judge meant it that way. This was more lamenting the senselessness of the entire situation.

[-] Godnroc@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Another way to look it at is that there are situations in which picking up a handgun in a small space with children present is justified; however, being evicted is not one of them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 49 points 1 year ago

Let's be real, he intended to shoot everyone. He's dodging his intent to murder a child before being put in with inmates who will know that.

[-] wildcardology@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

He's supposed to be one of the "good guys" with a gun?

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Good thing there are guns everywhere so a momentary burst of anger turns into a permanent tragedy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

This is what libertarian thought does to a person. People lose all sense of perspective.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Meho_Nohome@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago

Valez believed that two women had come to the house to evict him

Did 2 women come to the house? Was he just hallucinating? Was he on drugs? The story is not very clear.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] skozzii@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago

Out shitty society created this situation. People need a secure place to live, and we need proper social securities in place.

And guns need to be regulated.

[-] ElBarto@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
819 points (97.5% liked)

Not The Onion

12175 readers
599 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS