this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
767 points (99.0% liked)

Television

1818 readers
610 users here now

Welcome to Television

This community is for discussion of anything related to television or streaming.

Other Communities

Television Communities

A community for discussion of anything related to Television via broadcast or streaming.

Rules:

  1. Be respectful and courteous to all members.
  2. Avoid offensive or discriminatory remarks.
  3. Avoid spamming or promoting unrelated products/services.
  4. Avoid personal attacks or engaging in heated arguments.
  5. Do not engage in any form of illegal activity or promote illegal content.
  6. Please mask any and all spoilers with spoiler tags.

Matrix Link

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

He just keeps going up in my estimation.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At the current rate things are deteriorating, I reckon Pedro Pascal has about 3 months left of being a US citizen :(

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

90% of new movie lead roles about to open up

[–] Grainne@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago

I'm a bit tired of seeing him in so much so suddenly, but if it's going to be anyone I'm glad it's someone as moral as Pascal.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Reminder that Pedro Pascal is related to Salvador Allande, democraticly elected communist whom the US overthrew and replaced with a fascist dictatorship.

The coup involved flying a plane into the Capitol on 9/11, 1971

Edit: 1973, and a plane flying missiles into the capitol building.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 2 days ago

1973 Chilean coup d'état

I assume you mean 1973.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/50CTJnPn0RC2tXg18zfcXxy/the-scots-who-stopped-air-strikes-by-a-violent-chilean-dictator

By flying a plane into the capitol you mean using military planes to fire rockets at the La Moneda Palace.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

LOL. I guess history doesn't have to be accurate.

[–] Stillwater@sh.itjust.works 133 points 2 days ago

Pedro stays based

[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Might as well just change the headline to say: "Pedro Pascal is on the right side of history" because like most others here on the federated internet he knows what's up and for him it probably started with his sister coming out.

All it takes is a little wake up call.
And now I'm thinking of the movie The Matrix again..
And if you're looking to support Pedro Pascal, may I interest you in this little (scifi-western) independent film he made with Sophie Thatcher?

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Regdok@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Give a spoiler warning next time.

[–] Scallops@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 day ago

Oh, Prospect is great!

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 90 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Remember a few months ago where there was that weird push to get people to dislike Pedro Pascal for some reason? It didn't even have a source other than "He's popular and in a lot of big stuff, so you must hate him."

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 160 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The reason was his public support of his trans sister.

[–] drcobaltjedi@programming.dev 44 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Oh, so douchebags hate him.

I know he got in a fight or something with that woman that was on mandalorian and the 1st deadpool over trans rights because he was close to someone trans. I didn't dive deeper into it since there was a clear ones a dirtbag and the other is chill.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mohab@piefed.social 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He seems like a nice dude, but you never know, honestly.

I love Conan, for example, and have been watching his show and listening to his podcast for years now, but I won't delude myself into thinking I know him or what he stands for in his personal life.

[–] shplane@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ya but Conan doesn’t stick his neck out to support marginalized people like Pascal does. I don’t know him personally, but all evidence points to Pascal being a good person.

[–] Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Now, Im not making a connection here, so dont take it that I am. Im only addressing your point.

Jimmy Saville. Put his neck out for kids for decades. Raised multiple millions over 40 years for various childrens charities and hospitals. Had tv shows, that made the wishes of children come true. Like meeting their heroes, or having once in a lifetime adventures.

The whole time, he was raping kids. 40 fucking years of being a nation hero, and as soon as he died, it all came out. Generations of people LOVED that man. And he was one of the most prolific child molesters to ever have lived.

mohab is right. You dont know any of these people. Grace Kelly once said “Hollywood amuses me. Holier-than-thou for the public and unholier-than-the-devil in reality.”. Do we really think thats changed? I mean, they all said nothing while Harvey was raping countless women. Why? Because their careers were more important. Even going so far as to praise the man in public.

You can like what hollywood people say, but you should never forget that they are always saying things to be popular. Because being popular is what gets you money in hollywood.

[–] shrodes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Saville stuff was well known in the industry I think.

See https://youtu.be/v4OzI9GYag0

(Apologies for the Piers)

It was. Theres many examples of people eluding to things, but not actually outright saying them. The reason being that the liable laws in the UK are that you need to prove what you are saying is true, rather than the American way of doing it which is that they need to prove you are lying.

And while it was an open secret, they all still went on his show, took his requests, and perpetuated the lie that was Jimmy Saville. And thats the real issue. Those who seek fame and fortune have a miserable track record of doing the right thing. They only joined the metoo thing because it was advantageous to their careers. Same with this Kimmel thing. If social media wasnt all abuzz with it, they would be keeping their mouths shout.

I will never, ever, understand why people look to celebrities to get their morality. You'd think the fact that Corey Feldman still cant name the people who raped him and Haim would say it all. Harvey was only the tip of the iceberg.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pretty sure no one said "hate him", just that he was turning up in everything. If you want to moan about the internet repeating things to a nauseating degree, you have my support. But the line for those things is LONG. And Pedro aint even at the front of the queue. "Nice" is.

[–] dditty@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

I was feeling a bit supersaturated with Pedro Pascal recently, just because Last of Us season 2 had just aired and he was in both the new Fantastic Four movie and Eddington both in theaters at the same time, but I've never had a problem with the guy and I definitely love how outspoken he is about societal injustices.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

what the fluff is up with the picture of kimmel they chose in the thumbnail??

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago

He's out of a job so he needs to look slobby and disheveled!! News articles have always gotta choose a picture that fits the way they want to portray the person's response to the situation, even if it's actually from years ago. It's one of my favorite things to see because it's just so funny.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Dude is aware of what it's like living in dictatorship in his ancestral country of Chile.

Hang on, Brazil rebuffed Trump's strong arming to go easy on Bolsonaro. And Pedro having the big balls to stand up to Trump. There seems to be pattern of two countries that suffered under a dictatorship. Who again supported the dictatorship in these countries before?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works 34 points 2 days ago (7 children)

This man becomes more and more irresistibly hansom the more he speaks.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

the only way to hurt disney is people cancelling thier disney+, espn, hulu plus subscription. it will be hard for marvel and SW fans to cancel it, since thier so addicted to the franchises. there is a reason why disney is shoveling so much MARVEL garbage to the streams, its keeping ti afloat.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 1 points 23 hours ago

Well it's not the only way, Disney was a company much before streaming services. The streaming part is low hanging fruit though.

[–] Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it will be hard for marvel and SW fans to cancel it

...You must not have seen to much of that stuff of late... Its not gonna be the Sophies choice you think it is.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yea i said those franchise wasnt good, but i feel like they have neough of "nufans to sustain them"

[–] Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They dont. No one is watching that shit, other than diehards. Its all slop as far as the eye can see. Even Andor, which has universal praise, has almost no one watching it.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 6 hours ago

nufans are pratically the diehard ones.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago

"They are" doesn't have an "i".

To conjoin those two words, you delete the "a" from "are", replace it with an apostrophe, and push them up together, getting: "they're"

They are

V

They re

V

They 're

V

They're

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Batman@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Maybe Disney didn't expect the subscription backlash and it's trying to reduce losses by asking it's spokespeople to give them a reason to "cave"

Maybe it's just Pascal being a good dude. Hard to know sadly, hope it's the 🪜.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 57 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He's spoken out on sensitive issues before I have no reason to doubt him here.

[–] Batman@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Alright, then I'm glad. Good for him saying what needs to be said. Dont follow celebrities. Probably to a fault.

[–] Kalothar@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago

Thank you, Batman

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

If you zoom in on that emoji, you can see in the background where The Undertaker is throwing Mankind off Hell in a Cell, and plummeting 16 feet through an announcer's table.

[–] dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago

Is this guy ever anything but awesome?

I don't want to see him in all the things, but I'm damn not complaining about how much he's in.

[–] etherphon@piefed.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He's already a millionaire and there are other studios....

[–] shplane@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (5 children)

You can get blocklisted in Hollywood very easily just by pissing off one studio. These tv executives definitely talk to each other.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
load more comments
view more: next ›