359
This should be an easy supreme court win, the federal government suppressing lawful free speech. But with the supreme court going 50/50 on Trump-favoring rulings who knows if actual justice will prevail.
this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2025
359 points (98.4% liked)
News
32290 readers
5054 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It amazes me that the US has no way to remove corrupt judges from the bench. Seems like a huge oversight in the US constitution.
Um, it's the second thing in there.
Impeachment is the way but that requires a bipartisan or super majority decision in congress.
Yeah. The framers of the Constitution really didn't have any experience in how political parties outside of the loyalist/patriot movements of the legislatures they came from. Even outside the US, there wasn't that much experience in how democratic governments generally create political parties; even the UK was in the throws of a century old Whig oligarchy.
A lot of the checks and balances written into the Constitution relied on each politician having a major degree of independence from each other. That political parties formed and that the system only had two big tent parties broke a lot of Congressional power.
This is no joke though... The USA is turning into one of those countries it would invade, to restore human rights and establish democracy
The USA is turning into one of those countries it would invade, to ~~restore human rights and establish democracy~~ get cheap oil and resources.
FTFY. The US has plenty of oil too, so the math checks out.
kakistocracy (/ˌkækɪˈstɒkrəsi/ KAK-ist-OK-rə-see) is government by the worst, least qualified, or most unscrupulous people.
That'll show 'em.
/s
deride - To laugh at, speak of, or write about dismissively or contemptuously. synonym: ridicule.