this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
765 points (99.5% liked)

politics

25765 readers
2732 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So I'm assuming that Sinclair will be demanding that Tucker apologize and donate and that the FCC will be threatening to cancel his podcast.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 202 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I am floored that I agree with that piece of shit, but… here we are.

What a weird time to live in.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 90 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Tucker is scared because kimmel and other media personalities are getting nuked. That's his money flow at risk, nothing else.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 50 points 5 days ago

Ya know there a principle I am rather fond of, doing good for bad reasons is still good. While Carlson may be a shitstain undeserving of his kneecaps and while he may be doing a good thing for bad reasons, well I'll take what I can get. We are effectively shrieking into the void like the banshee outside of my window, nobody hears us but they do hear Carlson.

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Probably, but it's smart to take allies where you can find them. A lot of right-wingers pay attention to Carlson, and his stance is hitting where left-leaning sources have no pull.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hector@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

He came out in opposition to the Iranian war and was given Ted Cruz the fuck you treatment calling him a dumbass on it. I think that was before Colbert got fired.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nightlight17776@lemmy.ca 25 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Similar thing for me recently. Learned musk is against collective shouts censorship. Made me really evaluate why I was against it. Still against it. Censorship limits freedom of speech but so does deplatforming the censors. Weird times

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 45 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but sometimes the enemy of your enemy is still your enemy. I agree with this one thing that Tucker said. I vehemently disagree with pretty much every single other thing he says, or has said.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] atoro@lemmy.ml 165 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Karjalan@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I was just thinking this is the perfect meme in this context.

Not only a good point... He dared to go against supreme leader, despite his much he normally licks boots, and when other more moderate people are licking boot about all this

I'm confused, but happy to see it.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 110 points 5 days ago (12 children)

What fucking bizarro world have I stepped into where fash-lite bowtie man is making sense

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 30 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Tucker's a smart guy with a clever tongue. He can lay out an exhaustive, reasoned, rationalist case for basic civil liberties. And then he can come back a day later to lay out an exhaustive, reasoned, rationalist case against them.

Just depends on which side of the line he's standing. Dude's a talk radio mercenary. He'll fight for whichever side he thinks will turn him a profit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Soulg@ani.social 30 points 5 days ago (1 children)

He's honestly been right about very niche things for a while, sometimes for the wrong reasons, and never a good person. But he's sometimes right

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago (2 children)

A broken Nazi Russian asset asshole clock is right once a day

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] krunklom@lemmy.zip 56 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

"Finally! I've finished my kill-bot. Come, gather round, as I unveil it to the world"

"But Professor Killington"

"Yes, adorable, one-legged, orphan Timmy?"

"Why did you make a kill-bot?"

"Well, so it would indiscriminately murder anything and everything that moves, of course"

"But professor, that sounds dangerous"

"Don't be a fucking retard Timmy. I know what I'm doing"

"O-okay Professor"

"Now everyone gather round as I turn on the killbot for the very first time, and be amazed as it makes me pancakes"

flips switch

"OH NO, STOP, STOP, STOP KILLING ME, KILL-BOT OH MY GOD, MY SPLEEN, OH, IF ONLY SOMEBODY COULD HAVE FORRSEEN THIS TERRIBLE TURN OF EVENTS".

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.ml 24 points 5 days ago

Timmy would go on to run for Congress on an anti killbot policy. He would lose to a bigoted blowhard who insisted on the right for all people to own killbots to make them pancakes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MangioneDontMiss@feddit.nl 42 points 5 days ago

Guess someone forgot to send tucker his check.

[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago

This man doesn't actually meaningfully believe anything that he says. That said, what he is saying here is true.

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 57 points 5 days ago

Huh, whatever happened to loving how things are done in Putinist Russia, Tucker?

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 42 points 5 days ago

Ugh Fucker Carlson making sense. I hate this world.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 45 points 5 days ago (1 children)

He just realized that he is NOT SAFE

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

Not since Trump flipped on Russia (again). Maybe he'll feel safer after another Alaska Summit.

[–] firewyre@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago

Holy shit I agree with Tucker Carlson?

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 37 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Interesting. I don't know who he is, but based on (part of) the Russian shopping video I saw of him yesterday, where he was excited at what everything a Russian supermarket has to offer, finally cumming into his pants after finding that Russia has bread, I wouldn't expect much.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I only saw a clip of that. In the piece, did he ever disclose how much a typical Russian makes in a year?

[–] Hector@lemmy.world 28 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Someone did detail that information and response and he had spent like more than a Russian makes in a month at that grocery store, which is geared for the Bourgeois there. Not a working man's store.

OMG they have Whole Foods in Russia?!?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 days ago

Nope. Too busy fucking a dark rye bagel.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 41 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So now he cares about such principles...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's something all the right wing grifters will realize at some point.

These people have no purpose if Trump forces all the news networks in the country to say whatever he wants. He no longer requires any of their services as mouthpieces.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bender223@lemmy.today 31 points 5 days ago (5 children)

They keep wanting a civil war between leftwingers and rightwingers, but seems more likely they will have a civil war amongst the rightwingers themselves. 🤦‍♂️

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago

Good for Tucker. Rare time I say it.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 days ago

Ahw fuck, why does it have to be Carlson? I hate it when dumb evil mother fuckers like him make actual good point

[–] selkiesidhe@sh.itjust.works 20 points 5 days ago

I Hate This Timeline.

I agreed with Cucker Tarlson and Marge Sporktoes on things! Wtf???

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago

Heartbreaking: The Worst Person You Know Just Made a Great Point

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 days ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Kurious84@eviltoast.org 16 points 5 days ago

Holy shit, Tucker dares to go against Trump.

[–] tgirlschierke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If he ends up getting Kirked over this, I'll gladly nudge him over the line to "on the right side of history". Won't mourn his passing though, he's peddled enough bullshit to make himself irredeemable as decent human being.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Did his funding change? Why all the sudden change? You got the fucker there.

load more comments (1 replies)

How do you know Tucker Carlson is grifting? His lips are moving. Be careful, fellas. You know who this goon is. Just because you agree with him, doesnt mean there isnt an agenda at play with this fucker.

load more comments
view more: next ›