this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
191 points (99.5% liked)

politics

25749 readers
2808 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As Donald Trump threatens legal action against his adversaries, particularly after Charlie Kirk’s assassination, he’s repeatedly talked about using one federal law: the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO.

Trump wants to bring racketeering charges against left-wing groups he’s accused of promoting violence. Some influential Republicans agree with him and have been pushing to include rioting as one of the crimes that falls under the racketeering statute, a decades-old law once aimed at cracking down on organized crime.

Kirk’s death and the resulting calls by influential conservatives to crack down on the left using the federal government’s official powers has called new attention to that push. Trump and his aides have said publicly they plan to channel the mounting conservative anger over Kirk’s killing into efforts to take on the president’s political rivals, including potentially pursuing RICO charges and seeking to designate some liberal groups as domestic terrorist organizations.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 59 points 4 days ago (3 children)

It’s so fucking stupid, because Biden could have very plausibly used the same fucking laws to forestall the fascist upwelling in the US - but no, that would have been “too divisive”.

So glad we dodged that bullet 🤦‍♂️🙄

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Next up: dodging real ones.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Better learn to dodge real fast.

[–] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Biden was too weak, that's something we can all agree with.

Last I heard he was still about 3 miles up his own ass about how good he thinks his legacy is. What a completely fucking useless tool, honestly.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Neoliberals/conservatives are imperative to fascisms success. Without them, the conditions for fascism to flourish wouldn't exist.

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 62 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Now all that's needed is redefining having a different opinion as being political violence, and America's transformation into a fascist dictatorship will be complete.

In fact, I think this approach was summarized best in Borderlands 2: "Did you know littering in [the city of] Opportunity is punishable by death? If not, you also ought to know complaining about Opportunity's laws is considered verbal littering."

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 26 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Now all that’s needed is redefining having a different opinion as being political violence, and America’s transformation into a fascist dictatorship will be complete.

How about declaring opposition to fascism to be terrorism?

Trump says he will label antifa as a terrorist organization

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 6 points 4 days ago

Just so, yes.

[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

feels like Kirk was made a martyr by his own just for this

can't even sell a dime bag on the street corner without immediate arrest but dude rifles someone in broad daylight and gets away for a whole day

whole thing sounds too wrapped up and clean not to be another narrative controller

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's just the complete incompetence of the FBI under Kash Patel.

Plenty of people are still out there selling dime bags without issues, trust me.

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 9 points 4 days ago

Plenty of people are still out there selling dime bags

And bless them too.

[–] Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm sure it's no coincidence that RICO was used against trump in Georgia when he tried to force them to overturn the 2020 election... no coincidence at all.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Yup, Trump is so simple like that.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Fathers look at what happens when you don't show love to your kids.

Don't fuck up like Fred Trump fucked up.

[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Fred fucked us all.

[–] gigachad@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Is there always some weird old law in the US you can use to justify your politics? Often I don't really get how the US legal system works. At the same time I guess this stuff is not really legal, but the broken jurisdical system makes it possible...

[–] mystik@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

There's often even some verse out of context in the Christian Bible to justify shitty behavior, in the name of God. It's turtles all the way down.