this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2025
518 points (95.4% liked)

196

4441 readers
2402 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

They are all black lol. :3

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 35 points 2 days ago (4 children)

LPT: good cops are actually hired every year, in a specific date. Bastards in the other days.

That date is the 30th of February, by the way.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 days ago

Not gonna lie, you had me in the first half!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 3 days ago

Not sure if this cross-posted correctly or not, but come join us at !acab@quokk.au if you want an anti-police community that's not moderated by the notorious JordanLund! 😊

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago

Oh, so now the tolerant left hates an equitable workplace? /s

[–] Emi@ani.social 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Honest question, what is acab about? Because in my mind you need someone to upkeep the law otherwise how do you deal with criminals? I'm probably just naive I suppose.

[–] orenj@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A good cop wouldn't tolerate the kind of systemic abuse you see in the states, and as a result, would be fired as the institution protects the abusers. All thats left is bastards

[–] glorkon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

But surely, if every good cop quits - leaving only bad cops in the police - that's not a desirable result, is it? Shouldn't good cops try to find ways to make all the bad cops quit, ultimately leading to a police that we could actually call good?

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 days ago

the american police system is sufficiently rotten that there's no realistic way to fix it, it needs to be completely dismantled and remade from the ground up.

If all good cops quit it would barely even be noticed.

[–] FearMeAndDecay@literature.cafe 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The problem with the police system in the USA is that it exists to protect capital, not to protect the people. The purpose of the police, as it currently exists, is to keep the lower classes in line. This is why the rich get away with most things. Even if a billionaire does get pulled over for speeding the fine isn’t even 1% of their income. More likely they won’t even be punished at all. Most people who genuinely want to help others either leave or get pushed out once they realize they’re only hurting the little guys. When people say acab or defund the police, they’re not saying that we shouldn’t have anyone to call, but they’re saying that we have to completely rebuild that necessary service. We need to take a completely different approach. Rather than sending in officers armed to the teeth into neighborhoods and communities they’re not a part of, we need to send people trained in de-escalation to their own communities (so that they’re actually invested in the well-being of their own community). Obviously there will be times when force is necessary, but the majority of the time, police officers don’t need a gun to give someone a speeding ticket or respond to a noise complaint. Also there’s a severe lack of accountability and punishment for bad cops which just encourages them to keep being bad and get worse, which is part of why we have such widespread, blatant corruption and police gangs

Tl;dr it’s a systemic issue that rewards bad behavior so good people either leave on their own or get forced out bc the system itself is rotten

[–] joan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

i do not deny that there is some level of corruption in the police force and restructure would help, but i think this is a vast overstatement.

I want to understand the common point of view on this platform, I see it quite often but I can never bring myself to agree with it... I don't see actual real life examples that the primary function of the police is to keep the lower classes in line. often I see people arrested and pulled over, but not subjugated. I don't think most cops are "bad cops"

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Hahahaha…sorry, a bit callous. Bad cops take power through all kinds of abuse and ganging up to bully good cops. Good cops have to deal with having empathy and the desire to avoid violence and the like so they have a harder time and the population themselves vote for center or right-wing candidates that install corrupt officials into high offices.

It’s not desireable for the people but for cops and the owner class it works out pretty fucking well. It doesn’t even work well to deal with crime but since most of that crime ends up being poor-on-poor the owner class still doesn’t give a shit. They get an army of morally bankrupt thugs and their neighbourhoods and crimes get protected so what do they care in the end?

I do not mean to insult but your comment reads like my dad voting conservative to lower taxes on the rich because he actually believes in trickle-down economics. He genuinely thinks CEOs and shareholders care about him, which is nice in a “oh he’s sweet but kinda stupid” sorta way. These people don’t care about what’s best for everyone, they care about what is best for them and as long as the system doesn’t fully crumble within their lifetimes they could not give a fuck.

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Police officers are frequently held to lower standards and allowed to commit abuses with impunity; any police officer who joins that system and isn't dedicated to police reform is just an agent of the system who should be assumed to be okay with the abuses.

[–] Robyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don’t want to imply that older systems were superior, just wanted to point out historical alternatives. Saying this beforehand because I noticed that the way I talk makes people think I’m endorsing stuff I’m not.

For most of human history there was no such thing as an institutionalized state police force, and yet law and order existed for millennia. To over simplify, you would have multiple powers that would try to mediate (or fight). As an example, in medieval Europe you’d have a local lord, guilds and the church, all with some form of guards to represent their interests. And you as an individual would likely belong to such a community. Also specifically the church would go out of its way to mediate problems of other people and prevent issues before they arise, both as community building and power projection (obviously).

The police of today are mainly here to protect property and maintain the status quo, they try to act like mediators, but in such conflicts they mainly come to pacify you so someone else can handle you. Personally my main issue is that we pretend like they’re much more than a civil suppression force. Like for some reason cops are still the main way states handle suicidal people, like jesus christ…

[–] joan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

guards implemented today to represent interests would most definitely be from mega corporations, or whoever paid the most money. I would much rather have the government enforce laws than that.

[–] khaleer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, police is a force of mega corporations. In a corrupted landscape, there is no difference.

[–] joan@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Well, directly is worse than indirectly

[–] Robyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yup, hence the disclaimer :)

I was mainly trying to point out that completely different systems are possible and that we today are COMPLETELY lacking any kind of peaceful mediation and prevention efforts or rather, to be more precise, such efforts are being actively attacked by people claiming personal responsibility (and usually advocating for more guns and or police too…).

But the state realizes we need SOMETHING, so it just sends in people with rifles who have the right to spontaneously and severely mess up your life or even murder you in cold blood with minimal consequences if any. The amount of times in the US a 911 caller got shot themselves almost immediately after the cop’s arrival always sends chills down my spine. Cops are trained to prioritize their own absolute safety over anything else, which includes the victim’s safety. They are not here to serve or protect us.

If I’m ever in a situation that would require more than just filing a report, I’m not calling the cops simply for my own survival. I would need to be in a situation with an active shooter to even consider calling the cops, where the presence of another shooter acting as a soldier wouldn’t decrease my survival rate.

[–] joan@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Your concerns are valid to some extent but I think these instances, while awful, happen much less often than you make them seem

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Shouldn't a "gay cop" be much kinkier?

[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Shouldn't a "straight cop" be beating his wife?

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's okay to say they're better off dead, this is what they do to Fred Hampton's grave.

[–] primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

For fuck's sake was killing him not enough?

I know it wasn't, and it won't be for them either.

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 7 points 3 days ago

Dr. Seuss got kinda dark in the later days

load more comments
view more: next ›