this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2025
143 points (93.3% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1491 readers
501 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/35891683

I have changed the original title of this post, as it is imo, thanks largely to discussion in this thread, with a lemmyusa mod, unnecessarily incendiary.

Original Title:

"lemmyusa.com is engaging in vote manipulation, suggest defederating unless it is addressed"

Mod Abuse:

https://lemmy.world/modlog/1432313?page=1&actionType=All

The instance has 3 active subs, it's unlikely the admins are not also the mods engaging in this.

Banning anyone who downvotes is a clear attempt to foster a chilling effect on dissenting opinions. The mods and admins of this instance are putting their thumb on the scales in order to make their ideas appear more positively received than they actually are.

Thanks for your attention to this.


I realize that doing a cross post here is... unorthodox, and this doesn't drectly involve my own interactions, and I am technically breaking a number of the rules of this comm...

... but I think this is worth the discussion and consideration of, and potential further investigation from this comm, which essentially functions as a de facto place for discussing things like this.


Further context / info I have been able to gather:

Here is a direct link to their own modlog.

https://lemmyusa.com/modlog

Their dedicated legal page:

https://lemmyusa.com/legal

Their described 'sidebar rules' appear to only be:

We're keeping it simple:

Be thoughtful, act responsibly, and treat others with respect.

No NSFW content.

Everything else seems to be in the Legal / TOS / Privacy Policy section.

My preliminary, most charitable interpretation of mod/admin activity here... is that they can and will essentially ban anyone who posts on their instance and is not a lemmyusa user, as any other user would not have agreed to their TOS.

???


Further, this instance appears to be hosting an account that is impersonating SatansMaggotyCumFart, a fairly well known, mostly parody/dedicated 'bit' account here on lemmy...

The profile description of their version of SMCF claims to be 'the only real profile!', and is using a clearly AI generated avatar/profile pic... and uh, to me at least, it seems very unlikely this is the actual SMCF.


UPDATE:


Ok.

After some conversation in this thread, I should add:

There is, and there was at the time this all started, a rule in the comm that much of these downvote bans took place in, which reads:

'No Serial Downvoting.'

Personally, I find this rather vague.

How many dowmvotes, in what timeframe, across how many comms/comments/posts, etc?

I am also still uncertain to what extent these actually are dedicated, persistent, serial downvoters, vs just a whole lot of randos seeing something on their feed and then downvoting it and moving on.

I get the intent behind trying to stem a mass wave of negativity, nobody likes a wave of mass downvotes and hostile comments...

But on the other hand, there should probably be a bit more clarity and specificity here, less heavy handed actions for less comitted and persistent behavior.

IMO, a balance has to be struck between allowing people to genuienly freely express their opinion via downvoting, but at the same time, there are clearly also cases where people or groups of people basically just downvote all comments or posts from a specific user or in a certain comm or pertaining to a certain topic, etc.

I myself am fairly confident I have managed to attract at least one person who downvotes all my posts/comments on their instance, simply because I am on their shitlist, apparently.

So ideally... we could maybe have a constructive conversation about that.


As to the SatansMaggotyCumFart profile on lemmyusa being an impersonatory account:

We've got one mod from lemmyusa here saying he really isn't sure, and personally blocked him, I think from his own user standpoint, not from the standpoint of himself as a mod.

IMO, the account still strikes me as likely another person, impersonating the actual user... I of course cannot be certain, but the profile still strikes me as very sus.


Finally, I am least personally going to strongly discourage any one reading this from popping in to lemmyusa and going out of your way to downvote every single thing on there simply because it is on that instance.

They are already in more or less lockdown mode, call that a win if you must.

I did not intend nor do I want this very post to act as an attack vector.


UPDATE 2


SatansMaggotyCumFart, the real one, has appeared in this thread and confirmed that the lemmyusa profile is indeed an impersonation, is not them.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Skavau@piefed.social 27 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Okay, so this is clearly a MAGA instance. But why did they tag it as conservative2? There's not even a "conservative" on lemmyusa.com

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

There are a number of ( lemmy ) instances that have a 'conservative' comm.

At one point, one of those was run by a genuine conservative mod... but they then abandoned it.

Then another person... it may possibly have been SMCF, but I am not sure about that... took it over and then ran it as a parody of itself, for a bit.

Then a 'conservative2' popped up as another 'genuine' comm.

All the above is my best vague recollection and should not be considered highly accurate.

Nonetheless... if something actually did play out along those lines... this fits the reddit style MO of meta-drama based naming conventions.

It would also fit with the general online right wing agitator MO of intentionally sewing confusion as to who is who and what is what.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's from !conservative2@lemmy.today (which seems to have been deleted or removed?). I don't get why the move to a new comm when they already control !conservative@lemmy.today.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

~~I'm guessing it's supposed to serve as an alternative to an identically named subreddit.~~

Just checked, conservative2 was banned from reddit 3 years ago, so probably not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 week ago (4 children)

If the users are actually serial downvoters, that's a perfectly fine reason to ban. Votes are supposed to sort the good content (for that community) from the bad, and if someone comes in and downvotes everything, that doesn't do that. They're not participating in good faith for the community's intentions. Voting isn't a Lemmywide opinion score that must be allowed to run unrestricted. It's ok for mods to say "this community is only for people who actually like its subject".

That's not to say there may not be plenty of good reasons to block the communities or defederate. They're likely going to stray into hate speech and/or host their own trolls. It's simply that banning people who are only there to disrupt it isn't itself some sort of high crime.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Donald J Musk does not want conversion in his posts, he does not want debate, he does not want to argue. He only wants adulation and praise. He goes as far as locking posts so no one can comment. The only thing you are left is block, or down vote his misinformation.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 8 points 1 week ago (14 children)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 16 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Voting isn't a Lemmywide opinion score

That is precisely what it is. I would say that browsing only a particular community's content and none other is not the most common way that people look at Lemmy.

It's ok for mods to say "this community is only for people who actually like its subject".

Dude what kind of content are people posting that is prompting any detectable number of people to run around downvoting all of it?

Personally my opinion is that if you're using multiple accounts to artificially inflate your number of up or downvotes, you're doing something wrong, but if you just don't like a bunch of content, it doesn't really matter whether "you are part of the community" or like its subject in terms of whether or not you should be allowed to enter downvotes. That's why they're there, for stuff that people don't like. You can always visit an instance which just doesn't allow downvotes, if you feel your stuff needs to be insulated from anyone being able to say that they don't like it.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

There are accounts who genuinely do go around downvoting en masse without any contributions. When I was growing my community, I caught about 5 accounts - some with no post history, and no contribution history on my community doing it. They also had a long mod log history of bans for doing it elsewhere.

So I banned them because they kept burying new posts. That is my right.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Dude what kind of content are people posting that is prompting any detectable number of people to run around downvoting all of it?

~~You must be pretty new here.~~ (Nevermind, didn't check who I was responding to)

There's around two posts a month in this very community where someone is complaining that they're expected to block a community with content they don't like instead of just downvoting everything they see from it.

AI communities are common ones, so are political comms, but there have been some postd where someone just doesn't like the memes of a certain meme community too. You're making a false assumption that people only downvote stuff for any sort of legitimate reason.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 10 points 1 week ago

Yeah if I made a metal music community, and someone who didn't like metal downvoted everything, why would I allow them to continue?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In my mind it's pretty simple.

  1. Federating or not with a MAGA instance needs to be on the basis of issues a hell of a lot more impactful than any kind of Lemmy voting misdemeanor or anything.
  2. I actually think that keeping open lines of communications with people under certain authoritarian structures does more to tear them down than any amount of "isolating" them can. It's why I don't have a problem with engaging on lemmy.ml for example. If people can never hear the counterpoint, then it's that much easier for them to continue the mental picture of whatever horribly skewed strawman counterpoint their overlords are telling them is the counterpoint. I don't think defederating from lemmyusa to "punish" them for being MAGA is the way to do it.
  3. I do think if they're going off instance and being obnoxious, then just booting them is probably the answer. No one's required to degrade their own Lemmy experience for the sake of these folks.

They're always going to be able to manipulate things on their own instance to try to interfere with strategy number 2 above. Lemmy.ml does this, presumably lemmyusa would do the same, just banning anyone from off instance that for whatever reason tries to engage with sensible stuff. But they can't ever do a perfect job at it, and I don't think other instances should be assisting them be pre-emptively shutting off that line of communication.

That is my 2c

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

For what its worth, I cross posted this, I did not write the original title, and I also agree that simply being a conservative instance is a terrible reason for defederation, muchless automatically.

What I do have a problem with is Power Tripping Bastards who enforce rules that are not stated, who have double standards, who are hypocrites.

Myself formerly being a conservative from a conservative household... I held not being a hypocrite as a higher virtue than anything else from my default worldview, and I altered my worldview instead of abadoning my integrity.

There are doubtlessly other such people, who could potentially be persuaded, as I was, by sound arguments, appeals to empathy, 'think of it from the point of view of the other'.

However at the same time... no one is or should be obligated to deal with having to argue with or try to teach hostile and aggressive people all the time.

I would personally prefer a standard of who is federated/defederated to whom be based more on the capacity of the mods and admins to have reasonable rules and also enforce those rules reasonably.

Not merely on face value political alignment alone.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It would be nice if there was an option to block vote Federation but accept content.

On the other hand, if an instance is largely acting in bad faith, maybe it’s best not to engage at all.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 week ago (41 children)

I've suggested something like that as a more advanced admin feature but they told me to implement it as a plugin, so I'm waiting until that's possible

load more comments (41 replies)
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't like conservative safe spaces but I also think serial downvoting should be ban worthy. It's essentially brigading. Hard situation, because there is a lot of room for mod abuse and it's already so easy to manipulate votes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Vote manipulation is when you organize voting, whether that's you with multiple accounts, a malicious instance just sending votes without real people, or stuff like that. Banning people isn't vote manipulation.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Suppressing votes is manipulating them.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Suppressing people who come to a community to just downvote stuff seems fine. If someone doesn't like everything the community likes they are not a good fit for the community

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (10 children)

That account definitely isn't me, I've had to register my username in every different instance because of the person impersonating me.

I only use lemmy.world and piefed.world so I'm not popping up on user's feeds who have chosen to block me.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Fascists maintain conformity by disappearing those who don't conform. PTB always.

[–] TheSilentNickel@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (16 children)

I'm a mod of the community. the reason for the bans isn't vote manipulation, it's serial downvoting which is against the commnity rules. right now there is an extreme downvoting brigading going on from lemmy.world because of this post and the cross post. feel free to go look and look who most of downvotes are from. lemmys don't like conservatives, and thats fine, but we are allowed to be on here too.

we locked the comments and the community to mods only because of teh extremist stuff happening after the charlie kirk murders. there were lemmys cheering and posting memes and laugnign about murder. if you don't like conservatives thats fine but then why are people mad if you are banned from a community that you only went to to downovte?

this seems to be a of drama over a community you don't even like. So why not just ignore and move on? i don't understand. here is screen cap of over 20 downvotes from someones post today (College conservatives reveal what Charlie Kirk meant to them and how they will keep his message alive)(https://lemmy.myserv.one/post/21138775)

I didn't block on names cuz voting record is public, all are from lemmy.world, but I can blcok them out of mod of this sub asks me to:

[–] Localhorst86@feddit.org 9 points 1 week ago (14 children)

because you're locking all topics in fear of discussion, voting is the only way to interact with your community.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›