this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
1063 points (98.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

37311 readers
1504 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] einlander@lemmy.world 233 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I don't know about y'all, but I know for sure who shot Kirk. It was the old man that lives at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW in Washington, D.C.. He is constantly using violent rhetoric and threatening anyone not white. He's scaring the neighbors. That's the guy that did it.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 73 points 1 week ago

Kirk probably wouldn't be dead right now if Trump wasn't elected, I fully believe that in some way or another

[–] calliope@retrolemmy.com 39 points 1 week ago (12 children)

You know, I was actually like “Kirk who?” for a second.

May we all move on to “Kirk who?” that quickly.

[–] sausager@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

These things happen, time to move on

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 203 points 1 week ago (10 children)

I 100% assume that the McDonald's employee who called on him is fake in some way, and they tracked him down through some kind of spy apparatus shit and just don't want to give away their methods.

I have no evidence and I don't really know how these things work, it just seems way way more plausible to me.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 125 points 1 week ago (5 children)

They didn't track him down because he wasn't the shooter.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] LilDumpy@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Ok, I'll accept this conspiracy theory and add to it:

It was actually the surveillance software in the AI drive through.

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Welcome to McDonalds
Would you like to report any serious crimes today?

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hi, I'm a near ghost that has evaded capture against all odds, would you mind holding my bag o' incriminating evidence while I order some nuggets?

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

President Not-Dead is excited about nuggies in his Huggies

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 week ago (8 children)

That could be. I'm still vouching for the "conspiracy" that Luigi actually didn't do anything but was selected as a lookalike scapegoat. The similar looks is what prompted the McDonald employee to call, and they incompetently called the police instead of the tip line.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 week ago

It's like the police always saying that they find a "passport" in the truck after some terrorist attack. They have inside informers and they don't want to disclose them.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Even if the tip was useful they can just claim to wasn't and just not pay it out. Not like there's an oversize process for it. Once they have the guy they can find the trail with whatever data they have and say they did it without the tip.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] bacon_pdp@lemmy.world 155 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Over the last 20 years for every $2000 in reward money offered by law enforcement in the United States, less than $4 has been paid.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 91 points 1 week ago (1 children)

or $1 per $500, or $2 per $1000. sorry, it was asking for fraction simplification

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 70 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I'm sorry, you're saying that only $1.214521 of every $607.2605 was paid out?

THIS IS AN OUTRAGE

[–] WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago

Finally someone spells it out in a way I can understand. That's outrageous now that it makes sense.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 week ago (16 children)

I didn't know rewards were common but have never looked into that, who reports those numbers even? They sound fun to go through

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 52 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Snitches can’t afford stitches due to duplicitous economic machinations.

[–] einlander@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Snitches can’t afford stitches due to duplicitous ~~economic machinations~~ Bitches.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Baked86@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago

he lost his job too lol bootlicker

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I KNOW WHO DID IT

points to white house

😏

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No one will get paid any reward. Some corrupt official is going to pocket that money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I swear if this guy is called Mario I'm going to lose my shit.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

From the low res photos he seems like he might be hot. Two hot shooters in a row? IDK what this means for fall and spring shooting trends, but I like it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 42 points 1 week ago

Of course not. We know how it is living in the trump times.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago

Like anyone can claim a reward for a false flag murder anyway.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you know who shot him, no you don't.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Yes I do, mr. treason with 34 felony convictions, currently illegally occupying the white house, did it

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

They used to say the rewards was for information leading to the conviction. If they don’t get a conviction, the reward is forfeit by default.

People are still gonna try though. They just have no legal recourse if the reward is not paid.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They just have no legal recourse if the reward is not paid.

To be clear, it's because while promissory estoppel and unilateral contracts are a very real thing you can sue over, sovereign immunity keeps that from being an option, particularly federally. If some private organization offered the reward you'd be fine, but when it is a sovereign immune government that hasn't waved it's immunity you're fucked.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Not only that, but one has to go through the FBI's tip line directly to be eligible. The McDonald's snitch called the police instead.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] elbiter@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

Roma traditoribus non praemiat

Rome doesn't pay traitors

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A lot of these rewards have small print that says that reward is for substantial information that leads to the arrest and CONVICTION of a suspect. The suspect has been arrested, but not yet convicted. Maybe they'll get their money at the end, if Luigi gets convicted, which I highly doubt.

Otherwise, people would just be turning in randos for the rewards. They have to be credible enough suspects that they can be convicted.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 11 points 1 week ago

Given how much information they lost during DOGE's bullshit. I don't think they bothered to record who the person was or even cared. Also they have a notorious reputation of never paying people.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Jokes on us. The taste of boot is all the reward they need.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I think it was Herschel, the Cracker Barrel Cracker that got canceled and reborn in a matter of days. He shot Charlie Kirk b/c he got canceled. Btw, that crowd in Utah was so white that mayonnaise was labeled spicy at the food court on campus. Also this, if the mf’er didn’t want to get shot, why in thee hell did he go to a school that coincidentally rolled back their policies regarding weapons/firearms on campus? There is that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

No one ever gets those rewards, or if they do, it's a couple hundred dollars for all your time they wasted.

Doesn't help to snitch to the government.

[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Soooooo…. Maybe stop looking for them?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 11 points 1 week ago

They're not looking for the culprit. They're looking for $100k.

Gonna be a lot of false arrests and fingerpointing.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You have an article about this?

[–] aramova@infosec.pub 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Here is one...

After initial news broke that they didn't dial the right number (she called 911, not the 1-800 tip line) officials walked it back and said maaaybe but we won't know until a conviction is final.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›