this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2025
201 points (93.1% liked)

> Greentext

8134 readers
88 users here now

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

He didn't win though

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 71 points 1 day ago (4 children)

My advice to my son has always been: if you’re arrested for any reason, whether you did the thing or not, you become a Pokémon named ‘lawyer’.

[–] manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 hours ago

You need to specificly say "I want to speak with my lawyer", cops in the usa have been able to deny someone saying something like 'dont I get to speak to a lawyer' isnt specific enough

[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is better advice than staying silent (at least in the US). If you stay silent, then police can keep questioning you for as long as you're silent and they want to. When you say you want a lawyer, then they're required to stop questioning you.

In other words, the act of remaining silent is not enough to invoke your right to silence. You need to break your silence in order to invoke your right to silence

[–] Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It took me a while! "Lawyer....", "law.....yer..." "laaaawyir".

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No matter the question: ‘lawyi… lawyi… lawyer!’

[–] Raxiel@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just be careful not to evolve into a LawyerDawg

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For anyone who doesn't get this, a person wanted to envoke their right to an attorney and asked for his "lawyer dawg." The police maliciously interpreted this as asking for a lawyer dog, which you have no right to, and the court agreed that that was a reasonable assumption and that the guy did not envoke his right to an attorney, so they did nothing wrong by not providing one.

[–] tofubl@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago

Lawyer?! I hardly even know her.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

That's not at all what happened. He spoke to detectives, and even allowed them to search his apartment to look for the victim (a woman he was falsely claiming he was friends with).

He was found guilty of her murder, and will be eligible for parole in 2041:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Lauren_Giddings

[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Surely someone wouldn’t just go on 4chan and lie

[–] meliodas_101@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Absolutely not, you don't say that all threads are Fake and Gay.

[–] xkbx@startrek.website 4 points 1 day ago

The gay is the best part ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

[–] EtnaAtsume@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

The judge also dismissed additional charges discovered during the investigation, including one count of burglary and 30 counts of sexual exploitation of children

Hey what the fuck

[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

When he goes on parole he can wait one year and finally play Battlefield 2042.

[–] communism@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

...the right to remain silent is literal. Don't do propaganda for cops and prosecutors. You can be completely silent; it is your right to, and you should exercise it (or reply "no comment", but literal silence falls under the right to remain silent too).

[–] MrEff@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Actually, there was a Supreme Court case about this. If you just sit there and say nothing after they give you your Miranda rights, they can make assumptions about things or simply continue for as long as they want. The case concluded with- you must declare that you understand your rights in some way and that you are invoking that right.

[–] communism@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

assuming everyone is USAmerican

The right to remain silent exists in plenty of places other than the US.

Throughline's We the People recently did an episode called, The Right to Remain Silent.

Media file