552

Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell bluntly warned Republican senators in a private meeting not to sign on to a bill from Sen. Josh Hawley aimed at limiting corporate money bankrolling high-powered outside groups, telling them that many of them won their seats thanks to the powerful super PAC the Kentucky Republican has long controlled.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] o0joshua0o@lemmy.world 129 points 8 months ago

It's hard to believe a Republican is pushing a piece of non-terrible legislation for a change.

[-] Lophostemon@aussie.zone 66 points 8 months ago

Yes! I’m confused! Hawley has always been a shithead. What’s changed!!?! I’m not complaining, just curious… and a little suspicious.

[-] DigitalTraveler42@lemm.ee 75 points 8 months ago

He's still a shit head, he just probably thinks this will limit corporate money to Dems, plus most of the Republican party takes donations from shady or compromised sources like the NRA, so it doesn't hurt them as much to limit corporate contributions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 53 points 8 months ago

He may actually be dumb enough to believe that such legislation would hurt Democrats more than Republicans.

[-] spudwart@spudwart.com 24 points 8 months ago

True believers are always a detriment to a false movement.

[-] yata@sh.itjust.works 20 points 8 months ago

He doesn't, and he won't. It is part of their culture war against woke. It will not end in any legislation, but it will be repeated ad nauseum in the press as if it was actually serious, and his voters will lap it up.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 119 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Imagine being about to die any day now, and still using your failing, literally sputtering life force to proactively stand for enduring corruption even when you're gone and will no longer profit from it, as if the corporations that bribe the Republicans and Neoliberals will be able to send the bribe checks to hell or something.

There aren't many villains, even in fiction, that lack any nuance to this degree. McConnell truly is a palpatine-esque cartoon of malevolence.

[-] Jarmer@slrpnk.net 36 points 8 months ago

He really is one of the most evil humans to ever exist in the USA. PLEASE can he die soon. PLEASE. The earth needs a win.

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago

I'm convinced he's a lich and we need to find his philactery first

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jtk@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 8 months ago

Somehow, McConnell returned.

[-] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

Jesus, I can just picture the Heritage Foundation fascist thinktank rolling a screen onto the Senate floor that's some janky McConnell LLM Max Headroom looking AI to tell the Senate Republicans what to think.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Jeff@lemm.ee 56 points 8 months ago

Let them eat their own faces. Corruption of these folks Tammany Hall level is where we are again.

[-] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago

Did you see that hawley basically wants to over turn Citizens United? That could be major!

[-] yata@sh.itjust.works 36 points 8 months ago

He doesn't though. It is all culture war posturing:

“Let’s get one thing straight,” Hawley bellowed this summer, “Corporations are not people.” The crowd, this one gathered in Washington for the social conservative Faith and Freedom Coalition summit, barely stirred. But then they erupted when the populist senator continued, “I’ve got news for these woke corporations: We are not going to surrender this nation to the cultural Marxists in the C-suite.”

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 38 points 8 months ago

This is typical conservative behavior. The moment the status quo does not benefit themselves, they become stridently progressive on that one issue.

Notice the subtext. Woke corporations and C-suite Marxists. He's opposed to corporations funding his opponents, and he finally got around to doing the math on Citizens United and realized that most corporations aren't run by fundamentalists and bigots.

Money isn't speech, and corporations aren't people. I've always said that. But the only reason Hawley agrees with me now is that the "people" are "saying" they don't want to be associated with fascists and terrorists.

[-] TheFriar@lemm.ee 19 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

But that’s…fine. Because corporationsa aren’t fuckin “woke” either. Corporations help nothing but corporations. Overturning citizens united does not change if their reasons for wanting to overturn it are stupid. These people are stupid. If they want to do the right thing for the stupidest, most incorrect reasons…it’s still getting the right thing done.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

I agree with you completely. It just seems like a lot of people are confused about being on the same side of an argument as Hawley when they know what a selfish gasbag he is. He hasn't changed in the slightest, and hasn't become a better person or principled in any way. His interests align with the greater good right now, and he'll be useful as long as that's true.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago

The cultural Marxists in the C-suite

Wtf does that even mean? It's just a nonsensical jumble of buzzwords thrown together. The crowd cheered for that?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ericisshort@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

It pisses me off that I agree with Hawley about anything, but here we are.

[-] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

I think it's always important to remember that people like him aren't evil incarnate they just have radically different worldviews, the majority of which I vehemently disagree with, but there's always some commonality out there somewhere. Cory Booker is working with Hawley on child labor prevention.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 53 points 8 months ago

McConnell's undeath can only be maintained by a constant flow of bribery cash. Nonexistent campaign finance law is where he hides his phylactery.

[-] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Okay, this needs to be the plot of an urban fantasy political thriller immediately. That's amazing!

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

He transforms into his original form of a tortoise and eats the donation cash as though it were lettuce.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 38 points 8 months ago

What's the catch? What is Hawley's new source of funds that he has and the Establishment GOP doesn't have? There's no way in hell that seditious pigfucker would cut off the money supply unless he's got a private source.

[-] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago

As I understand it, the more extreme nutcases like Hawley and MTG get much more of their funding from small donations. They make the news for saying insane shit and being controversial, spread their crazy bullshit on social media, and then get money pouring in from around the country.

I think it's clear at this point that the MAGA Republicans are willing to undermine their party as a whole if it fits their agenda. What do they care, anyone who isn't 100% loyal to their movement is just a RINO anyway, right?

[-] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

Maybe I'm being overly optimistic but it's at least possible he just thinks it's wrong. He's a grade A schmuck but like it or not he is a senator. Maybe this could create bipartisan support to over turn Citizens United.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] halferect@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago

This is confusing because Hawley is pretty fucking evil but this bill makes sense..

[-] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

I replied to another comment saying that it's important to remember that these people are not evil incarnate. Many of them just have a radically different worldview, one that I strenuously disagree with in many ways, but that doesn't mean there can't ever be compatibility. Cory Booker is working with Hawley to combat child labor. Booker disagrees with Hawley on a lot of stuff but he'll put that aside to work on something productive.

[-] halferect@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Gacy was a great member of the community and helped at hospitals and charitable event but he also murdered a lot of people and I can say he was evil. Is Hawley evil I would say yes, can he do right things sometimes? Sure but his end game is inherently evil

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] oyo@lemm.ee 13 points 8 months ago

It only applies to publicly traded companies, which tend to be beholden to the "woke, oppressive majority" of society. Private companies would remain free to funnel unlimited funds to their choice of shithead.

[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 8 months ago

sorry but i don't trust hawley he has an ulterior motive

[-] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

It would be a mistake if Democrats didn't at least pursue this behind the scenes.

[-] buzz86us@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago

I vote we have a law where politicians have to have logos of their sponsors emblazoned on all their suits

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] qwertyWarlord@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

Incredible. Do citizens united next. Full support

[-] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago

From the article:

Hawley’s new bill, called the Ending Corporate Influence on Elections Act, is aimed at reversing the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision that loosened campaign finance laws

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

Yes just keep handing our democracy over to the highest bidders and see how this all ends

[-] Unaware7013@kbin.social 10 points 8 months ago

You make it sound like that's not the express aim of the mainstream republican politicians. This isn't a bug to them, it's a feature.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] j4k3@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

Anyone resisting corruption legislation should be placed under direct investigation, prosecuted, and made into the primary benchmark example.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 9 points 8 months ago

Isn't he busy dying or something?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago
[-] Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

I've been thinking about this for awhile cause Gates has said some similar stuff in the past, I'm guessing they're scared of establishment republican PACS turning on them.

Idk though, the so called "establishment" republican elite hasn't done much against Trump and his cronies the past 8 years

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Looks like someone is afraid of the truth... Good. Let the truth out, and let it hurt.

[-] phar@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 months ago

Yertle the turtle, King of the swamp

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


(CNN) - Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell bluntly warned Republican senators in a private meeting not to sign on to a bill from Sen. Josh Hawley aimed at limiting corporate money bankrolling high-powered outside groups, telling them that many of them won their seats thanks to the powerful super PAC the Kentucky Republican has long controlled.

According to multiple sources familiar with the Tuesday lunch meeting, McConnell warned GOP senators that they could face “incoming” from the “center-right” if they signed onto Hawley’s bill.

But there’s also no love lost between McConnell and Hawley, who has long criticized the GOP leader and has repeatedly called for new leadership atop their conference.

Just on Tuesday, Hawley told CNN that it was “mistake” for McConnell to be “standing with” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, in their push to tie Ukraine aid to an Israel funding package.

Hawley’s new bill, called the Ending Corporate Influence on Elections Act, is aimed at reversing the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision that loosened campaign finance laws – an effort that aligns the conservative Missouri Republican with many Democrats.

According to a list of senators obtained by CNN, McConnell singled out a number of lawmakers who benefited from his outside group over the last three cycles: Mike Braun of Indiana, Kevin Cramer of North Dakota, Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, Dan Sullivan of Alaska, Joni Ernst of Iowa, Roger Marshall of Kansas, Susan Collins of Maine, Steve Daines of Montana, Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Katie Britt of Alabama, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Eric Schmitt of Missouri, Ted Budd of North Carolina, JD Vance of Ohio and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin.


The original article contains 474 words, the summary contains 283 words. Saved 40%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
552 points (97.6% liked)

politics

18065 readers
4308 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS