this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
328 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19096 readers
1159 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Highlights: House Republicans are proposing funding $14 billion in aid to Israel by cutting additional money for divisions of the IRS tasked with making sure wealthy people and tax cheats pay their fair share, according to a new bill filed Monday.

The bill would also eliminate a task force intended to design a free direct e-file tax return system that could wind up competing with TurboTax—a change that the company, and politicians, particularly Republicans, have fought. Advocates have said such a system could save taxpayers billions of dollars, and millions of hours of prep time, per year.

The GOP’s latest bill matches $14 billion Biden’s funding request for Israel in number—but not in its proposed approach.

The thought of—as my colleague David Corn put it in Mother Jones‘ internal Slack channel—”letting billionaires cheat to pay for bombs to drop on civilians” is jarring, particularly given the more than 3,500 children that Gaza health authorities say have been killed by the Israeli airstrikes; heartbreaking photos and videos have shown kids covered in blood and dust and collapsing while coping with living through the trauma of war and losing loved ones.

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DoomBot5@lemmy.world 139 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I have a better idea. Fund the aid to Israel by funding the IRS more, so they can investigate all these Republicans. Should be enough money there to give Ukraine a nice additional package as well.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What’s crazy is the IRS funding increase that Dems put through is basically supposed to pay for itself (unlike the fake promise that comes with tax cuts paying for themselves, which fails every time)

[–] mycatiskai@lemmy.one 48 points 1 year ago

The IRS got $122 million from just 100 tax cheats, which further funded them to investigate more tax cheats.

This is what has them so furious to cut funding to the IRS because it works and it gets money from rich people's pockets.

TYT talking about the tax cheats: https://youtu.be/wiL9Gx0ZwZ8?si=54eNALHHlYmcWfhu

[–] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 year ago

Much more than pay for itself! It will help decrease the budget defecit.

So just like many things Republicans do that they falsely claim will reduce the defecit, this "cost cutting measure" will actually increase the budget defecit.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No kidding. The IRS actually generates revenue. These jerks want it shut down because they hate paying their fair share.

[–] Igloojoe@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

The GOP is just anti-American. Sponsored by Russia.

[–] Amaltheamannen@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How many more billions does Israel need? If I was American I would be ashamed to fund a colonial ethnostate.

[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 7 points 1 year ago

Yes, many of us are.

[–] RubberStuntBaby@kbin.social 98 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How about the exact opposite? Cut funding to Israel to fund the IRS.

[–] MustrumR@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Nice, you are onto something.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Gotta clean house in there first. So many Magassholes in leadership positions in that agency.

[–] TheJims@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Republicans will never stop crippling America financially.

[–] RubberStuntBaby@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago

"the party of fiscal responsibility"

[–] Xariphon@kbin.social 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As usual, a Republican saying two things we should do the opposite of.

3 things. They also want to eliminate the free filing software for the average person.

[–] coach@lemmynsfw.com 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Remind me again why we need to fund the world's strongest and most elite military?

You all do realize each and every citizen of Israel is drafted. This allows them to select from the best in the country. Again, why are we funding this?

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Republicans don't actually know how governments get money, do they?

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They know. The GOP is anti-government. They've done nothing but gut regulatory bodies and cut taxes for the rich, with some occasional bipartisanship, for over 30 years.

[–] TechyDad@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only exceptions are things like abortion bans and laws restricting the rights of groups they don't like. Then, suddenly, the GOP are big fans of a large government.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The large government was the one stopping abortion bans until the right wing SCOTUS overturned ROE v. WADE, tho.

[–] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What? No lol. I don't think you understand how government regulation works. Stopping abortion bans was just a handful of Justice Department lawyers prosecuting lawsuits on Constitutional grounds. Enforcing abortion bans will require any number of absurd bureaucracies - auditors to review medical records, police to investigate reports of illegal behavior, prosecutors to litigate cases, some kind of agency to enforce any fines levied, more prisons.

Enforcing a ban requires massively more government intervention than filing a few lawsuits did.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Smaller Governments across the USA have banned abortions after the SCOTUS ruling, so them banning abortions is not an example of them being pro-government. It was just another example of them dismantling the federal government. A better example to make the above point would be drawing attention to the times when state lawmakers took away school district's rights to teach certain subjects, as the school districts are small decentralized governments being bossed around by the larger state government.

[–] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 0 points 1 year ago

Lmfao that is not at all what Republicans mean by smaller government. They literally mean "no government regulations of any kind"

https://theconversation.com/the-shutdown-drowning-government-in-the-bathtub-111333

"Many believe that government is at best superfluous and at worst a drag on a free market. It has long been their aim to cut taxes to “starve the beast.”

Grover Norquist, who founded Americans for Tax Reform in 1985 at the urging of President Reagan, declared in 2001: “I don’t want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub.”"

They want government taxation and regulation at ALL levels GONE (except when it's convenient for their political agenda, we see)

What you're talking about is their disingenuous pretending that they care about local government and "states' rights" to hide their real agenda.

(Funny enough "states' rights" was also used as an excuse to maintain and expand slavery before the Civil War. So never forget that bigots have always been liars because they know they're wrong and evil.

https://www.pbs.org/opb/historydetectives/feature/causes-of-the-civil-war/#:~:text=A%20key%20issue%20was%20states,Another%20factor%20was%20territorial%20expansion.)

I don't know where you got your information from, but they're wrong. I lived through the 80s; I've been listening to Republicans talk about "small government" for 40 years. They only care about being able to handicap taxation and regulations that cost corporations money.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Oh, they do. But the party gets the money primarily from the big donors, so it is important to keep them happy. The load of the taxes is on the shoulders of the middle income people, anyway, who cannot afford to bribe the politicians their way.

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The politicians generally do, the voters generally don't.

[–] Balthazar@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Blue collar crime. The only crime that exists.

/s

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Can't be anti-white collar crime or they'd be locking themselves up

[–] Szymon@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago

They're just pieces of shit, that's all.

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago

I guess we can't fund Israel then.

[–] Doorbook@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your tax money is going to a military state that you have no control over.. nice..

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

Already was

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

GOP: we made a graphic to explain our new plan.

❤️🇮🇱➕💰🔫➕🖕🇺🇲👥👥👥➡️👍✝️➕🤑🧐🎩

[–] robdor@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 1 year ago

Isn't that the cancel culture they hate?

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

The GOP is standing at the concession, plotting Palestine's oppression

[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

What wacky world did I wake up in. Last I checked GOP voters were always in the majority of the pro-Israel camp. When the heck did that change, or is it because GOP has to sign the check this time around they don't want to openly support them?

[–] KonalaKoala@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

And then it has a high possibility of turning into 'The House GOP's proposal: Gets vetoed by President Joe Biden'