this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2025
273 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

4023 readers
459 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 120 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Dipshit. Just do bad coding and leave timebombs that could be considered an accident.

[–] Elechicken@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, there's a reason he got fired and it wasn't because he's a genius...

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Yeah, name it after the boss, not yourself!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] x00z@lemmy.world 116 points 1 week ago (9 children)

For developers in similar situations, where the corporate overlords make your life miserable; use dead man's triggers Instead of a simple killswitch: manually start handling certificates, introduce memory leaks that you can easily clear, have excessive disk filling logs that you can daily clear, and all kinds of other stuff that is a perpetual dumpster fire that you extinguish as part of your job. Oh, and don't forget to forget commenting and documenting. The next developer should instantly learn the pressure they have been putting on you.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 63 points 1 week ago

Errr

That's EXACTLY why I did that in the past. It wasn't an accident at all. Nope. It was future proofing my job. Completely intentional.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd like to imagine countless instances of this that we never hear about because there just isn't anything concrete to write a news article about

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Well the guy from the article is named David Lu and added a function with the name IsDLEnabledinAD. That by itself deserves an article.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] AmazingAwesomator@lemmy.world 94 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

company ruins life of employee: stonk

employee ruin company: immediate imprisonment

edit:

Ultimately, Eaton Corp. bore substantial costs getting its network back online

actually, it did nothing to the company but cost it a few bucks. do not pass go/collect $200.

this person was not fired, he was laid off. he was not actively harming the company until the company ruined his life.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 90 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The defendant breached his employer’s trust

The company breached employee trust when they fired a bunch of people during a "realignment".

Four years is far too long. If he had run over the CEO in the parking lot he wouldn't have gotten four years.

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's because they can quantify damages that way. Because you legally cannot put a value on the life of a "human" (still unsure if CEOs are human, but legally they still are), it's just "murder" and not "you cost us eleventy billion dollars in downtime." One is more negotiable in terms of damages than the other.

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Then Ceos should be treated and charged with every crime a company commits or this is another class problem I'm going to solve. The guy who made the opiod crisis literally walked away with a billion dollar fine but should've gotten multiple live sentences for multiple murders.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] amzd@lemmy.world 56 points 1 week ago (2 children)

4 YEARS?! And gaming companies can just build a kill switch into their game and get no penalty?

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 9 points 1 week ago

Tesla build them into fucking cars.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

The difference is, the rich and powerful do their crimes with lawyers. A contractor could actually write something into their contract that allowed them to install such a kill switch. And it would be perfectly legal. No different than if you stop paying for a software license and the program stops working. But regular employees don't have the leverage to demand such a kill switch. Maybe more programmers should form unions. Write it into the contract that if the contract ever expires before a new one is signed, the union has the right to remotely activate a kill switch, shutting down crucial operations within the company. As long as this was all disclosed and signed to, it would be perfectly legal.

[–] roundup5381@sh.itjust.works 54 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Have to make an example of them lest the surfs realize they have power

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago
[–] roundup5381@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thought that didn’t look right

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're both words. Serf is the one for a person subject to someone else's rule just to live. (obvs not fully accurate definition, but dictionaries can give you the real deal)

[–] roundup5381@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago

Yea, sorry, English is my first language.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] tazeycrazy@feddit.uk 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No one reviwing his code? Sounds like a timebomb in its self.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This was my first thought. Just zero code review going on? Some random server only that dude knew about? tf kind of controls these people have in place?

Oh right, none of the shit the company should have had.

Instead of jail time, the government should consider giving this guy whistleblower status and investigating the corp for negligence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago

Gotta stay "lean".

[–] Alph4d0g@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Sounds like he could have been a bit more creative in implementing this. Having something immediately traceable back to a username is no bueno.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 week ago

What he did was brazen and stupid but 4 years sounds a bit excessive. Unless the journalist is under reporting what happened, he didn't do any long-term damage just probably knocked them offline for a day and required somebody to come in and manually reset the drsm account in the domain controller.

But in a fit of rage and passion he built out booby traps and put his name all over everything. He wanted them to know it was him, How do you absolutely denied himself plausible deniability.

All he had to do was pretend he was inept and replace service accounts with his own login. Push 90-day password resets on the account for 'security'. Set up a house of cards out of security certificates.

The company probably walked into that court with a technically competent team of lawyers and a bunch of expert testimony, he probably had a state defender.

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 22 points 1 week ago

Kinda funny. 4 years seems excessive to me but what do I know.

[–] Jimbabwe@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Kinda heroic, ngl. I think the prison sentence is appropriate, but if I was let go after 11 years, I’d harbor fantasies of doing something similar. They’d stay fantasies, though.

[–] al_Kaholic@lemmynsfw.com 21 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Prison? For shutting down the computers? How many lives were lost because of his actions, how many were saved?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hodgepodgin@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

this was stupid. A career ending move. no one’s gonna hire someone who wrote a logic bomb at their last job.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'm curious what this crowd thinks is an appropriate punishment here. No priors, found guilty, caused some lost revenue (which I have to admit doesn't mean you actually lost revenue). So, should they even be sent to jail? House arrest? Or do we just want consistency in punishments?

[–] jonesey71@lemmus.org 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He should get a corporate level penalty. He made X dollars while working for that company but did something wrong while making that money. He should have to pay back .001% of his profits as a fine and the illegal stuff he did should then be ignored/forgiven. That is what corporations get as a penalty when they break the law, I think it should be applied when they are the victims.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Good. Some one should sponsor and hire this guy.

[–] dastanktal@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

This is really well executed, too bad he didn't know enough to protect his identity.

Still, so much for that reduced cost of labor.

If more people reacted like this companies wouldn't be so fast to lay people off

[–] Florn@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago

Should have done a dead man's switch instead

load more comments
view more: next ›