this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2025
15 points (85.7% liked)

Asklemmy

50228 readers
407 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Would you approve of this for a good purpose? Just asking. Won't actually do it.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No one would starve... the impact that fast food has is on what is grown and harvested.

McDonald’s mandates a particular type of potato for thier fries with no blemishes, so the company mandates a certain insecticide that the farmers have learned to stay inside when it is applied.

Coffee growth and harvesting is a brutal business but I am not sure if that can be pinned just on Starbucks.

If the fast food places where denied product I think the long term impact might be on prices..

[–] Karl@programming.dev 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

so the company mandates a certain insecticide that the farmers have learned to stay inside when it is applied.

Why do they stay inside? Is it like a secret?

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Karl@programming.dev 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Oh, so the potatoes aren't really good for health? How is this even legal?

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

The potatoes are fine the insecticide isn’t.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just as healthy as the rest of the food you get there.

[–] Karl@programming.dev 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Dang, I thought only the product was toxic. I was gonna distribute that shit in Gaza.. In my stupid lil novel about conquering the world that is.

[–] Magnum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Karl@programming.dev 0 points 1 week ago

Nvm. I already said too much.

[–] Magnum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

Is it a secret omegalol

[–] flynnguy@programming.dev 8 points 1 week ago

I haven't been to a fast food restaurant in ages, most restaurants I do frequent are because the food is good and I want to support them. I think I'd be fine as long as there were still grocery stores.

[–] SwimmingInTheeStars@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Didn’t we find out during covid that groceries (in the US) carry about 3 days worth of food? So no.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 6 points 1 week ago

Now .. if you had asked about sysco....

Hunger is a pretty powerful motivator, so I'm sure people will find a way

Source: me snacking while I wait for my SO to get ready so we can go grab lunch

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

If that happens governments will divert resources from grocery stores to fast food and force people to buy from there. Because capitalism.

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If it happened overnight, probably a lot of people would starve. An individual not getting to eat at their favourite shit-house would just go to the shop and buy some "real food". If everyone individual couldnt then suddenly the food shops are getting hit hard and would sell out in no time. Not to mention the panic-buying that would start up. People likely getting trampled to death and all sorts, stabbed up in the car park for their eggs and stuff.

If the fast food places quietly went away over a month or two everything would be fine.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

If they were robbed of resources, so are we so yeah

[–] 200ok@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I'm sure they'd love for you to believe that

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

Nope although I think in some cases people have to get food from convenience stores like that are in gas stations.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 week ago

All of them? Yeah, I could see starvation because they supply so much physical food that I don't see the economy being able to sustain such a hit to supply.

I wouldn't support it because there are reasons why the current fast food infrastructure has been built. I feel like you'd curl the monkey paw when getting rid of fast food.

What if you engineered real food and spiced it like each of theirs, subverted the supply chain for a little bit, and gave people real food? Then you take it away in a week or so and everyone realizes that these chains have gone downhill.