this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2025
511 points (99.4% liked)

politics

25420 readers
2347 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The California Supreme Court will not prevent Democrats from moving forward Thursday with a plan to redraw congressional districts.

Republicans in the Golden State had asked the state's high court to step in and temporarily block the redistricting efforts, arguing that Democrats — who are racing to put the plan on the ballot later this year — had skirted a rule requiring state lawmakers to wait at least 30 days before passing newly introduced legislation.

But in a ruling late Wednesday, the court declined to act, writing that the Republican state lawmakers who filed the suit had "failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FundMECFS@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Abolish arbitrary districts. Towards Proportional Representation.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 days ago

This is either the beginning or the end of democracy.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Can someone explain to me how this matters? Do republicans really think they will take California? Many of the reds there already moved to Texas.

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It means fewer Republican representatives from California in Congress. They're doing it to match the number of Democratic seats Texas is going to gerrymander out of their state.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works -5 points 6 days ago (3 children)

But congress doesn’t actually do anything anymore. King Trump holds all the power and as it stands now, congress is mostly ceremonial.

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Because the Democrats are the minority. If they pick up 3 or 4 seats in the midterms, they can actually do something about it

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's going to take a lot more than a slim majority to do what needs to be done.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Reminds me of 2018

That dem majority really turned things around...

[–] BlindFrog@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Surely giving up and trying nothing will turn things around!

/s

[–] mysticalone@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

Even blocking his agenda is something.

[–] Azal@pawb.social 5 points 6 days ago

Congress doesn't do anything right now because the Republicans have so little of a majority they can't afford to lose votes.

If they go full majority it further legitimizes Trump's agenda when laws are written specifically for him.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And your counter suggestion is what, rolling over?

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The only thing that solves fascism is incredible violence. There's just no way to get enough people to act yet. It will happen when people run out of reasons to comply with laws that only apply to them, but theres going to be a lot of suffering and misery inflicted on us all before enough people say fuck it and grab a brick.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

The only thing that solves fascism is incredible violence.

That's not exactly true.

  • The deposition of the Greek junta in 1974 resulted in the deaths of 24 protestors (estimated) at the hands of a fascist tank, but no large-scale violence broke out. Infighting within the junta and the junta's invasion of Cyprus caused far more death than the revolution did.

  • The Carnation Revolution in Portugal that same year only resulted in 4-6 deaths, total, all caused by the reaction of the regime being overthrown; no one was killed by the revolutionaries.

  • In Spain, just a year later, Francisco Franco died of natural causes; and while I wouldn't call what happened over the next few years "peaceful," it wasn't quite two years from the death of Franco to the new government's first successful election, and that time wasn't marked by anything I would call "incredible violence."

  • Uruguay transitioned from a dictatorship to a democracy in the mid-1980s. It was a little over a year between the first General Strike and the inauguration of the first democratically-elected president of the new government (though some elements of democracy had been filtering back into the government for the previous few years). No one was killed by the anti-fascists.

  • Pinochet's incredibly violent rule in Chile ended with an election and a peaceful (albeit extended) transfer of power between 1988-1990.

Today, all of these countries have a score of 85 or higher on the Freedom House index.

There are other similar examples: Argentina in 1982, the Philippines and the People Power Revolution in 1986, South Africa defeating apartheid in 1994, even South Korea last December. Not all of those are great examples, whether because they didn't stand the test of time or because they weren't "quite as bad" to start off with, but it certainly seems that in the modern era, defeating fascism can be done nonviolently.

Will it be done nonviolently in the US? I don't know. All I know is, every fascist regime in history has either fallen or is in the process of falling. It's just a matter of time, and how many people die along the way.

theres going to be a lot of suffering and misery inflicted on us all

Definitely true. One way or the other, this isn't going to be a fun time.

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 168 points 1 week ago (16 children)

The supreme court denied the republican's claim that democrats didn't wait 30 days before passing the legislation.

Democrats used the technique of "editing" an existing bill by replacing all the text. Its not technically new legislation, its an edit, which doesn't require 30 days before passage. Clearly against the spirit but not letter of that rule.

Courts can only rule on things they are asked to rule on. The court declined to stop the bill based on the specific procedural issue in this case. The court did not rule on the merits of the redistricting law itself. There will surely be more judgments in future

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›