this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
362 points (93.5% liked)

History Memes

3323 readers
724 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism, atrocity denial or apologia, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Lemmy.world rules.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cjoll4@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

They had more than three sons. Cain, Abel, and Seth are mentioned by name, but they had other sons and daughters.

Adam's Descendants to Noah

GENESIS 5

This is the book of the generations of Adam. When God created man, he made him in the likeness of God. 2 Male and female he created them, and he blessed them and named them Man when they were created. 3 When Adam had lived 130 years, he fathered a son in his own likeness, after his image, and named him Seth. 4 The days of Adam after he fathered Seth were 800 years; and he had other sons and daughters. 5 Thus all the days that Adam lived were 930 years, and he died.

[–] Leather@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

God damn! I guess from the biblical perspective, It's a good thing for all of us the first three Republicans we're into Mom bod, because it seems like most of them are pedophiles.

[–] onnekas@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 day ago
[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Genes were stronger back then obviously. Not like the flaky ones we have these days!

[–] iamdefinitelyoverthirteen@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And Cain was worried someone would attack him when he was exiled. Fucking who? Ain't there only 3 humans in existence???

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 94 points 2 days ago (10 children)

I just did a quick search on answers to this, and the few literalist ones that i saw were bad. The literalist answers all seem to boil down to "some additional thing happened that wasn't written about". If you can add additional situation-altering things to what the bible actually says, then you're saying what's written isn't actually important

[–] callouscomic@lemmy.zip 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Growing up in all this (both school and church), I remember a few arguments teachers and church leaders would make:

  • Essentially there was a short period of "incest is okay to get things rolling" until it wasn't.
    • The sons had children with their mother to get that ball rolling.
    • There were tons of other kids not named and the siblings did it.
  • A theory about other people outside the garden of Eden. This is almost certainly true since some translations clearly imply the existence of other people/towns when Cain is leaving. This is also the most plausible answer.
  • We don't know cause Genesis was likely written by Moses thousands of years later from flawed oral history

Also, the same issue and questions arise again in some ways after the Flood and Noah's Ark. The resulting cousins all had kids together?

Mostly I remember these apologetics kind of discussions just got us in trouble for asking obvious questions and questioning logic.

While I massively criticize religion anymore, what I will say is that my belief was these religious scripts are possibly holding some truths, but the oral history, telephone game of it all, AND ancient peoples not knowing how to properly explain things results in what we have here, which, if taken literally, is fucking stupid.

It helps to think of the Bible and most religious texts as fables rather than history.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Sounds like the kind of thing you want to wager your soul on.

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago

A theory about other people outside the garden of Eden.

Whenever I picture religious debates and arguments, I think of this scene from Halo 2. Nay, it was heresy!

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

While I massively criticize religion anymore, what I will say is that my belief was these religious scripts are possibly holding some truths, but the oral history, telephone game of it all, AND ancient peoples not knowing how to properly explain things results in what we have here, which, if taken literally, is fucking stupid.

It helps to think of the Bible and most religious texts as fables rather than history.

Yeah, this is the only reasonable way to look at it. Once you consider how little sense it makes, and also that all religions have some sort of origin story with the same level of truthiness, but being mutually exclusive, it makes all of them obviously wrong. I'm sure there's some reason the stories exist. Some event happened in the past, or some people trying to explain things based on their understanding. However, that doesn't make it true. Some of it can still be useful though as fables with moral lessons.

I'd advise against using any religious text for morals though, or you end up stoning people for someone's wife doing something wrong, or something like that. They might have been useful at the time, but I feel we have better ways of teaching morality now. Most people don't need to think there's some guy in the sky watching them to not be evil.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Science flies you to the moon. Religion flies you into buildings.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Yeah I think it is more a lit the metaphor of 'we are all family' and less about 'fuck your siblings'

[–] violetsoftness@piefed.blahaj.zone 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

there's hundreds of english versions of 'the bible' and the most popular one was written just a few hundred years ago. They have been adding additional situations as needed the whole time, there's nothing else in there if you don't believe in divine inspiration.

[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 days ago

No! Clearly it's an unbroken line of a translations from God to now, with zero alterations. It's the only logical option possible. It's not like going from language A to language B could cause translation errors, right?

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 2 days ago (7 children)

I just figured that the people who wrote anything in Genesis couldn't be bothered to mention any unimportant daughters that were born. Eve was only a rib.

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 13 points 2 days ago

I'm fairly sure the Bible actually does allude to Adam and Eve having heaps of other children, they just aren't named.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] mateofeo85@lemmy.world 80 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] NichEherVielleicht@feddit.org 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 days ago

Any port in a storm.

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I can't believe god allowed mpreg only to patch it out later.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Maybe it hasn't been patched and we just aren't trying hard enough

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I liked genes with patches.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 57 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Nah, that's stupid.

we are all butt babies

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] plm00@lemmy.ml 41 points 2 days ago (6 children)

There are many things to nitpick, but that isn't one of them. Old Testament mentions Adam had both sons and daughters.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

That's not better, is it?

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Either was there's some incest going on.

[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Mitochondrial Eve (evolution) proves incest, so there's that.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

She was also the main villain in the PS1 rpg classic, Parasite Eve!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FardyCakes@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Uh, I’m pretty sure it was Adam and Steve.

Jeez nobody goes to church anymore.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] omgboom@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Genesis 5

This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him;

2 Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created.*

3 And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, and after his image; and called his name Seth:

4 And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Even before Seth there was Cain. Genesis 4

But the Lord said to him, “Not so; anyone who kills Cain will suffer vengeance seven times over.” Then the Lord put a mark on Cain so that no one who found him would kill him. 16 So Cain went out from the Lord’s presence and lived in the land of Nod, east of Eden.

So God made Adam and Eve who made Cain and Abel. But there are other people out there who Cain knows about and is scared of. There's also another land called Nod. Cain also found a wife and had kids.

"Everybody comes from Adam and Eve" doesn't work and is so stupid it really shouldn't be a thing anymore.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

That first part of genesis is just two creation myths in a trench coat.

[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Yeah, I mean if you think about it, if you really read it, the Bible is written to tell the Jewish people that they are the most specialist, special people on the planet. And everyone else can kinda just go fuck themselves.

Even Jesus didn't really much like performing a miracle for someone who was from Canaan

Mathew 15:22-28:

And behold— a Canaanite woman having come out from those districts was crying out, saying, “Have mercy on me, Master, Son of David. My daughter is badly demon-possessed”. 23 But the One did not respond a word to her. And having come to Him, His disciples were asking Him, saying, “Send her away, because she is crying-out after us”. 24 But the One, having responded, said, “I was not sent-forth except for[a] the lost[b] sheep of the house of Israel”. 25 But the one, having come, was prostrating-herself before Him, saying, “Master, help me”. 26 And the One, having responded, said, “It is not good to take the bread of the children and throw it to the little-dogs[c]”. 27 But the one said, “Yes, Master. For indeed the little-dogs eat from the crumbs falling from the table of their masters!” 28 Then, having responded, Jesus said to her, “O woman, your faith is great. Let it be done for you as you wish”. And her daughter was healed from that hour.

Which, like, one reading of it says, Jesus was so cool that all you had to do was have faith in him and good things would happen to you.

But on the other reading of it, Jesus is ignoring this woman as she begs for her daughter's life, and not until the woman debases herself in front of Jesus does he deign to sprinkle a miracle her way.

He literally called Canaanites dogs, and it's not like it was a huge miracle. The girl was possessed by a demon. Out of all of the people on the planet, the son of God would be the one person who could just like kind of blink in that demon's general direction and banish it. And he wouldn't spare a blink for this woman until she begged him and debased herself for him.

And I get it, to a certain degree, I obviously don't understand what it's like to be the Son of God in any way, shape, fashion, or form, but I'm sure the requirements of being Jesus, like your daily existence, must have been stressful at a level that I could only comprehend if I was actually on fire.

But this kind of makes me not really trust my local pastor, talking about how Jesus loves me when I'm farther removed from being a Jew as almost anybody on the planet, not including china.

If Jesus would barely be convinced under an incredibly public and annoying situation to send a tiny little sprinkle of blessing somebody's way because she just doesn't happen to be a Jew, then my Native American ass likely does not stand a chance in hell.

And that really sucks, because I believe in him and I've prayed to him and I've talked to him my entire life, just being realistic about it, I mean, cross-checking the number of prayers I've had versus the numbers of prayers I've had answered, and cross-checking how much I wish I was a better person, and how often I've prayed for guidance, or understanding, or wisdom, or forgiveness, or strength, or anything, to become a better person. better person and what a piece of shit I actually am in practice, and don't get me wrong, I'm not like a puppy kicker or anything. It's just there's nothing good about me at all.

And so when you cross compare everything in my life, you counterbalance that by the amount of good that exists in me, even though I'm not offensive, I'm not gonna go to the good place.

And there's a part of me that wonders if it's because I just wasn't born the right race, you know?

I mean, there's literally millions of non-practicing people who happen to have been born Jewish, who, if they could just confer their birth right on me, would change my life for the better in so many ways, because I would have been branched into God, and therefore God would have to hear my prayers or something. But I don't know any non-evil way to do that. I don't even know an evil way to do that. I don't know any way to do that at all.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The interpretation I heard was that she was essentially not only converting to worshipping Jesus' father, but also denouncing her old religion.

The Canaanites specifically were essentially enemies of God, and are all descendants of Caine*. So basically they are the exception to the rest of the world, and that's why she had to unusually defenestrate herself to receive the blessing.

Jesus does help non-Jews in other instances without such hesitation in the Bible.

*From what I remember at least

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GreenMartian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Omg. Command & Conquer was a Bible reference this whole time? (Kane was the leader of Brotherhood of Nod)

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Kane also shot his second in command, a guy named Seth, in the head in one mission intro.

C&C Renegade was probably the most explicit with the implication that he was the biblical Cain, but it was always a thread in the Tiberium games.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 3 points 1 day ago

Pretty sure Kane WAS the Bible guy. He was around when humanity was in mud huts.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I have a friend who is a priest. He refers to the Genesis as mythology.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Why does he draw the line at Genesis? Why not the entire Bible?

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›