this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
13 points (55.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

11318 readers
1378 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 37 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Nah

AI slop is excarbating climate change. Like. We're fucked even without AI, but it's like driving a car off a cliff and setting it on fire before you go over...

It's not helping and even if a few people thinks it looks cool, that fire is going to suck because and make what little time we have before the cliff even less pleasant.

[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world -4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

But not all AI output is slop, that's the point.

It does use a huge amount of energy, often for little reward, but so does social media. Facebook uses a staggering amount of energy. For what? Opt-in propaganda and ads. TikTok uses a truly enormous amount. Again, for what? 30 second videos of dances and the stupidest people of earth sharing their "life-hacks".

The slop issue isn't AI, it's humans.

[–] Melonpoly@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What is your argument here? That because Ticktock and the like use up huge amounts of energy for their slop that is fine for AI to do the same? Because I could just reply with:

"Social media isn't the issue, it's humans."

And what AI output isn't slop?

[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'm saying trying to dismiss all AI usage with the energy usage argument is disingenuous if you don't have a similar issue with social media.

The truth is that you've read someone else saying it and latched onto to it.

As for "what AI output isn't slop?", come on - literally anything can be bad, generated by AI or not. I personally use AI for spotting bugs in code - it's good. I also use AI to generate complex XSLT and regexes - it's very good at that.

Is it 100% correct all of the time? Of course not, but it gets it right on the first try far more often than a person would, in a fraction of the time.

I built a tool that generates MCQs from a given text for revision - it's extremely useful.

I use it for translations when I want to read something a different language. Is it perfect, again no, but it's better than I am, and it allows me to understand the text.

Also, AI is in everything already - your camera app, the Google suite, even your car if you have TSR.

AI itself isn't the problem - it's the people who create slop that are.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -4 points 8 months ago

But not all AI output is slop, that’s the ~~point.~~ lie

If you teach a turtle to use a skateboard it's going to think it's amazing and no one could ever need to go faster than that.

Because turtles are fucking slow.

Give a deer a skateboard, and it's not going to give a shit.

Some people are turtles, so AI seems useful and impressive.

Maybe someday AI will improve and a person of average intelligence will find AI impressive. But at this rate the human race won't last that long.

That's the main problem when AI comes up in discussion, there is a very wide gap between someone who thinks AI is useful, and someone who actually understands what it is, what it does, and what the true cost is.

So if you try to explain it with facts and logic, it has no chance of working.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago

Gross.

LGBT people: just living, don’t impact you by existing

AI: now the internet is chock full of complete and utter hallucinated bullshit, and anyone who wants to flood the zone with lies useful to their pet cause has access to a firehouse. Facebook is filled with pictures of aliens and fake versions of archeological artifacts (hell, there are slop pages that post fake Holocaust survivors)

YouTube is full of garbage “music” and top ten lists that spread horseshit about animals and historical events.

Amazon has crafting and foraging manuals that are entirely made up. Good luck foraging for mushrooms, if you’re lucky maybe it won’t just be the AI hallucinating!

Jobs are being lost because C-suite types will happily sacrifice quality and accuracy to save on salaries. Businesses that would have to pay an actual artist to work on their advertisements instead shrug and post soulless garbage.

Gen AI should not exist. The collective delusion around fancy markov chains and plagiarized pictures/videos is fucked.

[–] schmorpel@slrpnk.net 16 points 8 months ago

Yes I will fucking freak out. The planet is on fucking fire, people can't afford basic groceries, species are dying - and some idiots insist in spending water, using energy and stealing people's works using some fascist tech-bro's doombot because AI is supposedly fun or convenient. I hate AI with a passion for all the reasons reasonable people keep explaining again, and again, and again: the environment, the copyright, the dark fascist agenda behind it. Soon enough I'll lose patience with stupid AI bros who are going 'but it's just harmless fun' and just screech into their ears at full volume in a last desperate attempt to wake up their shrinking GPTchat-fucked brains.

[–] Thistlewick@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 8 months ago

Comparing people with legitimate concerns about the use of AI with conservative bigots is definitely an opinion.

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

Because once the name went from machine learning algorithms to AI a bunch of mindless zombies started pretending that it was what is now being called AGI. So companies started it putting it in everything which believe it or not bothers people

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 14 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Seriously someone here merely asked why people didn't like AI here and he had a dozen down votes before the first comment even came in. It's clearly just a trigger for some people.

[–] schmorpel@slrpnk.net 9 points 8 months ago

No, it's not just a trigger. It's just really that bad.

[–] A7thStone@lemmy.world -5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Seriously someone here merely asked why people didn't like Nazis here and he had a dozen down votes before the first comment even came in. It's clearly just a trigger for some people.

I'm not saying AI is a bad as Nazis, although a lot of it's proponents are, but maybe you can see how people might have a visceral reaction to it and not want to "discuss it's merits".

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You literally did compare it by writing that. You literally compared AI to Nazis. That is a horrid comparison.

[–] A7thStone@lemmy.world -3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

At the rate it's going to will result in the death of at least as many people. Stop your pearl clutching, and read my actual statement, or get offended and ignore what I'm saying, doesn't matter to me. Little Nazi techbros wasting massive resources on a toy that's more damaging than good doesn't deserve discourse.

[–] Ifera@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Once again, a reactionist who doesn't know that things like AlphaFold, AI assisted malignant tumor scanning and a few other very beneficial technologies are also AI. Technologies that are not slop, or "A human would do better" scenarios but true breakthroughs.

[–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

You know full well that's not what people are talking about when they are pushing AI currently. There are plenty of great tools that have been around for awhile, but these bullshit chatbots that are wasting resources are not useful tools.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 months ago

Doesn't matter whether the person described here exists or not, AI is dogshit either way