this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
27 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

39623 readers
255 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Netflix used generative AI in an original, scripted series that debuted this year, it revealed this week. Producers used the technology to create a scene in which a building collapses, hinting at the growing use of generative AI in entertainment.

During a call with investors yesterday, Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos revealed that Netflix's Argentine show The Eternaut, which premiered in April, is "the very first GenAI final footage to appear on screen in a Netflix, Inc. original series or film.” Sarandos further explained, per a transcript of the call, saying:

The creators wanted to show a building collapsing in Buenos Aires. So our iLine team, [which is the production innovation group inside the visual effects house at Netflix effects studio Scanline], partnered with their creative team using AI-powered tools. ... And in fact, that VFX sequence was completed 10 times faster than it could have been completed with visual, traditional VFX tools and workflows. And, also, the cost of it would just not have been feasible for a show in that budget.

Sarandos claimed that viewers have been "thrilled with the results"; although that likely has much to do with how the rest of the series, based on a comic, plays out, not just one, AI-crafted scene.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mgnome@piefed.social 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And in fact, that VFX sequence was completed 10 times faster that it could have been completed with visual traditional VFX tools and workflows.

Yeah, generative AI model that is probably trained on some IP that they probably do not own, will do the job faster. Duh.

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 16 points 1 day ago

Not to mention they only had to spend billions to develop and train the model instead of paying people a living wage

[–] Coolbeanschilly@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This AI approach will go the same way as computer generated special effects went. The visuals will be "glorious" and the reliance on a true story will suffer. Mass entertainment will continue to become shallower than a toddler wading pool.

This is why I'm back to only reading books for imaginative fantasy. My imagination is the only generative intelligence I need. I refuse to hand over my intellectual sovereignty to the beast.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

VFX can be amazing in bringing something to life that words alone can't convey.

The main issue here is that you need a cohesive story that would work without VFX, with the latter being additive instead of a replacement for plot. Whether it's CGI or anything else, the storyline still rules.

Let's go back some 40 years, to the Cliffs of Insanity scene in The Princess Bride (by S. Morganstern) -- the effects weren't great, but no one fucking noticed because the story itself was compelling.

[–] Coolbeanschilly@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly so. But the "creatives" in mass media are interested in money, not magic.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 3 points 1 day ago

Made today, Falk would have cut in with "Westley doesn't fall at this time."

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Huh, Netflix found a way to make its shows even worse. Business as usual, even if the tech is different.