27
this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
27 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
39660 readers
58 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This AI approach will go the same way as computer generated special effects went. The visuals will be "glorious" and the reliance on a true story will suffer. Mass entertainment will continue to become shallower than a toddler wading pool.
This is why I'm back to only reading books for imaginative fantasy. My imagination is the only generative intelligence I need. I refuse to hand over my intellectual sovereignty to the beast.
VFX can be amazing in bringing something to life that words alone can't convey.
The main issue here is that you need a cohesive story that would work without VFX, with the latter being additive instead of a replacement for plot. Whether it's CGI or anything else, the storyline still rules.
Let's go back some 40 years, to the Cliffs of Insanity scene in The Princess Bride (by S. Morganstern) -- the effects weren't great, but no one fucking noticed because the story itself was compelling.
Exactly so. But the "creatives" in mass media are interested in money, not magic.
Made today, Falk would have cut in with "Westley doesn't fall at this time."