Anecdotal but I'm not seeing his stuff as much on Instagram as I was before the primary election. Almost feels like IG tuned him down in the algorithm.
this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
697 points (99.3% liked)
politics
24791 readers
2146 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It's as if IG is controlled by a billionaire so cowardly and manipulative the far left and right hate his guts.
Is he posting as much stuff? I'm not saying you are wrong, but I wonder if he's put out less stuff if he's trying to recalibrate his campaign for the general election.
Fuck yeah! Checking in from Portland where 3 of our 12 city councillors are democratic socialist. Love this shit, go Zohran
I love his platform and his face. Look at that face.
Oh noez! This socialist communist man of the people is too popular! /s
He'd have my vote if I lived in NYC.
Let's move so we can vote for him!
The undead disembodied specters of the foul decomposing corpses of the bloated geriatric elites are assembling as we speak in vast underground chambers that reek of brimstone and sulfur.
yeah, I've read these stories countless times and the outcome has always been the same. In all honesty I think they do more harm than good. It gets it into the morons heads "oh, he's going to win, I can stay home".
In all honesty I think they do more harm than good. It gets it into the morons heads “oh, he’s going to win, I can stay home”.
I keep seeing this line printed over and over again, in every election cycle, by people who seem to think there really is this enormous body of people who are enthusiastic about a candidate but unenthusiastic about voting.
Hell, Cuomo complained about it shortly after the election. He lost because too many people liked him too much and thought his win was assured. I heard this after Brexit. I heard it after Hillary lost in 2016 and after Trump lost in 2020 and after Harris lost in 2024. We can have historic high turnouts and historic low turnouts. We can have sea changes in the composition and ideology of the voters. We can have scandals flood the papers a day before the election that throw polls into chaos and candidates who coast to victory on double-digit margins. (Incidentally, Mamdani won by 12% in an election he was projected to lose by more than that a month earlier). The "I was secretly so popular that people forgot to vote for me" myth endures.
I've got an alternative hypothesis. Maybe people turned out for Mamdani because they liked him a lot and people stayed home for Cuomo because he was a creepy sex-pest POS. It had nothing to do with their projected odds of winning and everything to do with their appeal as political leaders.
sure, until his momentum hits a very large, orange, fascist wall. let's hope that doesn't happen.
He needs to have the most supporters possible to help fight that obstacle.
I feel like that one's expected and therefore not the biggest threat. Everyone knows what the biggest threat is but only that it's spineless and makes no sense, so good luck planning ahead for it. Numbers should help, but have seem meaningless in the past.
I guess the biggest threat are the neo liberals running the party.
Hey so let’s not go ham on the pessimism just yet. There’s a lot of things that can go wrong in a lot of places, yes, but we’re seeing a lot of good things so far. Let’s not assume he and the movement he’s starting is gonna fail a priori.
sure, but may i point out you are telling me to "not go ham on the pessimism" during modern American fascism spearheaded by a would-be dictator who has a hardon for deporting legal brown citizens and SCOTUS is fine with it
Dude I’m right there with you. It’s dire. But refusing optimism when it’s reasonable only just hurts morale. This is reasonable.
i’m not refusing, i promise. i won’t reject optimism—i am, however, going to constantly remind people how difficult this is going to be because not even half of Americans understand the basics of fascism. we are in deep and the legal routes are gone. i want the stark reality to be felt and understood.
Yes so New Yorkers need to get out there and raise hell if Trump even so much as tries to touch Mamdani. Fail to do that and democracy is well and truly dead.
absolutely raise hell. nobody should be quiet in the face of tyranny. however, i believe democracy in the US has been dead for quite some time.
Having Mamdani on ballot is a sign of a sliver of hope, of whatever life left in democracy. If you wish to make this ember into a fire, everyone needs to get out and vote. Show that having a worthy candidate will make people come out and vote. Show dems that with the right policy they can win, but only if they would listen.
They know, and consider that a threat.
Depends on the size of the wave behind him. Studies have shown a wall alone isn't as effective at stopping large waves. Now when there are effective and thought out breakers further out, the wave tends to have little effect.
Thankfully, this administration is incompetent. Problem though is the amount of resources they have and a Democratic, and Nationwide resistance, that can't stop eating their boots for failure of any true effectiveness.
We need a leader. Just like the Republicans, we need a person, or person, we can rally behind. Figureheads that stand as tall as Trump. Until then, what we have are several broken fronts working loosely together against a larger, [mostly] coordinated force.
Figureheads that stand as tall as Trump
Should they also wear lifts? Or is it important that their height is natural?
It’s almost like someone needs to do something about that wall. But by all means, keep waiting for someone to come save you.
i hear ya.. i do. i am unfortunately personally unable to do the deed.
Fucking love this polling. The only shot the establishment has is either Adams or Cuomo dropping out and endorsing the other. Cuomo won't quit because he's a sociopathic narcissist. Adams can't quit because if he can't do Trump's bidding in NYC, Trump will probably prosecute him for corruption (and he is very guilty of corruption). Throw Silwa into the mix and the moderates will have to choose between two corrupt megalomaniacs and a weirdo in a beret, while anyone remotely progressive will gravitate towards Mamdani.
Aw... they did poor Curtis Silwa dirty.
Like, Mamdani all the way. But if I've got to pick between those last three, Silwa's clearly the least awful choice.
I honestly don't know too much about him except that he was a Gaurdian Angel founder and he took over the Reform Party.
I vote for Not Sure. He's the smartest man in the world.
So...Socrates?
Also to note for others: NYC only has ranked choice for mayor in primaries (or special elections), so there is no ranked choice in this general election
The only ones that don’t want Mamdani in Gracie Mansion are the rich fuckers ruining the city. There are many many many more working class people in NYC than rich fuckers.
The issue is how many "working class" people identify as "working class". How many get all their information from Fox News, Newsmax and wherever Tucker Carlson and Alex Jones are posting from today. Also, how many are completely disengaged from politics and don't even know who's Mayor, let alone who might be running in the next election? The rich may be few in number, but they're engaged and mobilized and have a lot of tools they can use.
Very fair point
That’s why they got that cunt cuomo to run independent.
Honestly at this point, because of first past the post, this probably splits the establishment vote. Which I personally think is hilarious (ranked choice being implemented would be better, of course).
Wow, I am finally glad that the worst people in the world telling you not to support them, even if some of those evil assholes are Democrats, has stopped working.
Yeah, because the Dems have been keeping him in news cycle after news cycle by attacking him so he can spread his policy ideas.
Maybe the real progressives were the Democrats we made along the way.
Somebody surly has come up with the right slogan
You don't mess with the Zohran!
Zohran the Destroyer!
Or whatever label his opponents came up with that make him sound badass
"You too!"
Tap for spoiler
fake headline duh
Mr. Mamdani, your campaign seems to have the momentum of a runaway freight train. Why are you so popular?
Keep it up!
fuck off newsweek with your clickbait bullshit, such a garbage outlet...