906
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 400 points 8 months ago

Other clips from the rally went viral as well, including Trump saying, “I’m for us. You know how you spell us, right? U.S. I just picked that up. Has anyone ever thought of that before?”

I hate this timeline so much.

[-] espentan@lemmy.world 205 points 8 months ago

I just picked that up.

More evidence he's a challenged 5 year old trapped in an old man's body.

[-] PwnTra1n@lemmy.world 51 points 8 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] penquin@lemm.ee 116 points 8 months ago

Reading this made me wanna cry. It's so fucking sad that millions of people actually voted for this man. Wow, just wow.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] 520@kbin.social 88 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Jesus. This sounds like literally every parody version of George W Bush, trying to get a laugh out of how massively exaggerated they made his stupidity.

[-] canthidium@lemmy.world 57 points 8 months ago

USA: We couldn't possibly elect a president dumber than GWB

GOP: Hold my beer...

[-] silverbax@lemmy.world 42 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Just because Donald Trump is a moron doesn't mean George W Bush wasn't incredibly stupid. Both things can be true.

Let's not forget that Bush only graduated from college because his parents donated money to keep him from being given failing grades and flunking out.

There are entire buildings on the Yale campus that only exist because W was such a poor student.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 188 points 8 months ago
[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 48 points 8 months ago

They don't usually do it in a way that would tank their own election though.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 170 points 8 months ago

“I’m for us. You know how you spell us, right? U.S. I just picked that up. Has anyone ever thought of that before?”

jfc

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 60 points 8 months ago

You know this sounds super smart to a certain group of people...

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.world 152 points 8 months ago

Sounds like another coup attempt being foreshadowed by Trump

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 46 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yeah, though I wouldn't be surprised if he legit didn't really want to be president in the first place, but the opportunity to fleece more people was too great for him to pass up so he just ran with it and can't stop now.

[-] skookumasfrig@sopuli.xyz 53 points 8 months ago

The grift is 100% there but I think he does want to be president again because he believes that that will absolve all crimes.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] qjkxbmwvz@lemmy.sdf.org 118 points 8 months ago

I'm not going to worry about voting on election night. Because I will have voted days/weeks earlier through my state's effective vote by mail system.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] thantik@lemmy.world 109 points 8 months ago

Didn't South Park already kind of pick up on the fact that Trump gives off the vibe that he doesn't REALLY want to be President, he just wants the perks of campaigning?

Mr. Garrison in like a whole 8 months of clips basically plots and plans on how he can get OUT of it, only to keep finding himself in situations where he somehow gets further in the polls.

This feels exactly like that.

[-] PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world 70 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

He just wants his name in lights. It's a personality disorder.

He doesn't want to do anything. He never has had to.

It's not talked about how just so seriously mentally ill trump is. The Goldwater rule is probably for the best, but trump is, well, just look into the DSM. Way worse than Goldwater.The wiki captures it as well.

[-] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 32 points 8 months ago

I went to a lecture of a criminal psychologist recently about psychopathy. Psychopaths are often also narcissists, and there are a number of personality traits to identify them. The more traits one has, the more likely the person is a clinical narcissist. Trump would check all those boxes, every single one.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] hogunner@lemmy.world 98 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I never knew that such a large portion of our population was so far below what I would have thought was the average intelligence until I heard they thought this man was smart. This guy is an idiot and that scares me to think what that means about his cult members’ intelligence levels.

No one dumb enough to think this guy is smart should be trusted with any adult responsibilities; not gun ownership, not voting and definitely not reproducing.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 96 points 8 months ago

Me after reading the headline: "Haha, that's hilarious! Yes, Trump voters, don't worry about voting!"

Me after reading the article: "Well, that was disturbing."

[-] yardy_sardley@lemmy.ca 96 points 8 months ago

You don’t have to vote, don’t worry about voting. The voting, we got plenty of votes.

Why does it sound like he's got a mountain of fake ballots sitting in a warehouse that he's gonna drop from a blimp or some shit.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 92 points 8 months ago

"Watch the voters"

We already have poll watchers, is he really trying to go full 1933 nazi and have his zealots "monitor" voters?

Great.

[-] MIDItheKID@lemmy.world 39 points 8 months ago

Watch them for what exactly? For... Voting for another candidate? I don't understand. Like. They are looking for fraud? What would that look like?

I don't get it. Like if I went and watched the people at my local voting center, I would see a bunch of senior citizen voulenteers handing out ballots, and then I would see people putting their ballots into the big scantron machine thing. That's what it would look like. That's what it looks like every time.

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 74 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

He doesn't want them "watching" for anything. This is a dog whistle for textbook voter intimidation tactics.

Sane people may be too scared to show up and vote because they actively fear for their safety due to threats of violence or social reprisal.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] I_Clean_Here@lemmy.world 79 points 8 months ago

It's so he can start bitching more and more after he loses again and his cult can try to overthrow the government again.

He wants to break the system, dumbasses.

[-] BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.world 38 points 8 months ago

He is prove the system is already broken. When in a democracy, voters who can read and write, who are impoverished and on avg can't even afford a $500 emergency vote for a billionaire, I'd say that is a failure of the system.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 76 points 8 months ago

Asking your supporters to engage in voter intimidation for the next election when you've been charged, and will be tried shortly, for leading an insurrection after the last election seems like a great game plan. /s

I can't imagine being this guys lawyer. You must either be eating a handful of Tums every night, or your just as loony as him and actually don't see how everything he says and does it toxic to himself and everyone in his orbit.

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 46 points 8 months ago

His lawyers are just there to drag it out, they plan on using mob violence to settle things when time runs out if he hasn't been elected.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 67 points 8 months ago

"Dont worry about voting, just intimidate and threaten the other people who are voting."

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 53 points 8 months ago

Other clips from the rally went viral as well, including Trump saying, “I’m for us. You know how you spell us, right? U.S. I just picked that up. Has anyone ever thought of that before?”

No, Donnie. No one has ever thought of this. You're the first, you beautiful genius. /s

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 52 points 8 months ago

Sounds like he's instructing his people to harass and intimidate voters. Add it to the pile of crimes?

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 48 points 8 months ago

This actually concerns me a bit. Not that I believe Trump can actually coordinate anything, mind you.

But at the same time, Trump really didn't lose the election by several million votes. He lost the election by a few thousand key votes in key swing states. Many of those states have passed dranconian laws, took over election boards, and put in rules that would allow them to just throw the election Trump's way regardless of the actual vote count. It's very possible that he's simply banking on those to carry him through the day regardless of the actual vote totals. If Trump believes (or is led to believe) the fix is in in those key areas, telling ruby-red voters in ruby-red states to stay home is no big deal.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 42 points 8 months ago

I agree, it would be a complete waste of time for they to vote

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Dizzirron@lemmy.world 37 points 8 months ago

Ya know... This is actually super wild for him to say. lol

load more comments (25 replies)
[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 36 points 8 months ago

Seems like he is calling for his supporters to swarm polling stations and scare away anyone who looks like a Democrat. He is counting on violence or the threat of it to give him a win.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] spaceghoti@lemmy.one 35 points 8 months ago

Let's game this out the way some of the comments are saying.

Scenario 1: Proud Boys and other right wing militant groups stand around polling places with open carry weapons to intimidate Democrat-leaning districts. Maybe it doesn't chase everyone away, but we know a lot of election officials are complaining about threats and have quit. So it's going to have some effect. Enough to swing the vote? I don't think that matters. It's still election interference.

Scenario 2: right wing militants show up, and so do various antifa groups to counter them. Maybe antifa show up armed, maybe not. Either way, it's an escalation. Escalating tensions with guns present significantly increases the chances that someone uses their gun, regardless of who shoots first. The first shots in a civil war? Then the right wing militants win, because they've been agitating for this for years. Who wins is immaterial to the millions of people who will suffer as a result.

Scenario 3: polling places are reinforced with police and National Guards as necessary to prevent any election interference. They can be present to "observe" but they're not allowed to intimidate anyone. This is the only scenario I can see where democracy is defended and preserved.

Agree or disagree? What am I missing? Where am I wrong?

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 46 points 8 months ago

You're missing that the police etc and the proud boys etc are the same group.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] rchive@lemm.ee 33 points 8 months ago

I think he thinks he'll lose, and he thinks a big loss is actually less believable to his supporters than a close loss, so he's trying to create a big loss, which will make more of his supporters Jan 6 2.0.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
906 points (97.5% liked)

politics

18059 readers
2638 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS