this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2025
138 points (97.9% liked)

Biodiversity

2329 readers
58 users here now

Welcome to c/Biodiversity @ Mander.xyz!

A community about the variety of life on Earth at all levels; including plants, animals, bacteria, and fungi.



Notice Board

This is a work in progress, please don't mind the mess.

2023-06-16: We invite our users to contribute resources for the sidebar.

2023-06-15: Looking for mods!



About

Biodiversity is a term used to describe the enormous variety of life on Earth. It can be used more specifically to refer to all of the species in one region or ecosystem. Biodiversity refers to every living thing, including plants, bacteria, animals, and humans. Scientists have estimated that there are around 8.7 million species of plants and animals in existence. However, only around 1.2 million species have been identified and described so far, most of which are insects. This means that millions of other organisms remain a complete mystery.

Over generations, all of the species that are currently alive today have evolved unique traits that make them distinct from other species. These differences are what scientists use to tell one species from another. Organisms that have evolved to be so different from one another that they can no longer reproduce with each other are considered different species. All organisms that can reproduce with each other fall into one species. Read more...

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Be kind and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.


Quick Links

Resources



Bypass Paywalls



Similar Communities


Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Plants & Gardening

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Memes



Find us on Reddit!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

New research on Monday contradicted the commonly held idea that males dominate females among primates, revealing far more nuanced power dynamics in the relationships of our close relatives.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I am shocked, shocked, I say!

You mean the guy selling me my leaded bone broth made an inaccurate observation about the dynamics of social hierarchies? These scientists are making claims that the accumulated lead in my brain is disputing.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

"New study says"

The author of the original "alpha" article spend fucking decades trying to tell people he was sorely mistaken and hadn't been observing group dynamics but family dynamics.

[–] solo@piefed.social 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Just to clarify, not family dynamics, but wolves in captivity.

Edit: What we call "wolf packs" are just families. They are loving and take care of each other. In the unnatural environment of captivity, wolfs demonstrate different and aggressive behaviors, and studying these behaviors lead to the alpha-male myth

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Okay that is a good point to note. Social dynamics of a family, in captivity.

Could very well compare it to how a single family acts around the dinner table (in a certain room, specific setting, all "bound" to the table or at least the house) — in comparison to say, a large family gathering. You'd have such different social dynamics, and you would sneak off with your cousins to do shenanigans while your dads aren't watching. Whereas at a family dinner kid would just be gloomy and play with his phone to which his dad would say something negative about phones during dinner.

I don't know I may have taken the metaphor too far.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

imagine being the author of that article and causing Andrew Tates. Yikes...

[–] artifex@lemmy.zip 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Those scientists are just Betas looking for an excuse.

  • Signed, a Sigma.
[–] generallynonsensical@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

A Beta wouldn't publish such a thing.

Humans and their stupid labels.

Signed, an Omega.

P.S. I don't know what an Omega male is, or if it exists. I just like the word.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm an Epsilon male, I try to be as unnoticeable as possible.

[–] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago

Nu-male here. Basically like the old school males but with baggier basslines.

[–] artifex@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] orenj@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago

I think it means you're submissive and breedable. I can't follow all these different kink labels though, so who knows.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

The title is misleading, the study doesn't say they're a myth, just not the norm. This would be like saying, "Marine mammals are a myth."

The study isn't saying "alpha males don't exist". It's saying not all primates have clear dominance across gender lines, ie. Males always dominating females. Some species like chimps and baboons do have male dominated social structures, while others have female dominated social structures like bonobos and lemur. Though for the majority, 70%, there is no clear gender that is dominant.

It doesn't say anything about hierarchy within gender though. As far as I know chimps do have a hierarchy within the males and there is an "alpha" at the top. That's not a myth and since the article does say chimps are male dominated it can be said that the troops has an alpha male who is at the top of the hierarchy.

This doesn't mean humans naturally have alpha males, as the article shows there is a lot of variance within primates, but alpha males are a real part of that variety, not a myth.

[–] solo@piefed.social 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I tend to agree with what you say but I feel like mentionning a couple of things I see perhaps differently.

I believe saying marine mammals are a myth has nothing to do with claiming alpha males don't exist. The first is about a biological classification, the latter is about observed (or projected) social behaviors within one species.

Apart from that, and to my understanding, the manosphere has taken a hold of the alpha male narrative and expanded it far beyond the scientifically debunked myth. I do not imply that the fact that the alpha male myth has been debunked means that there are no hierarchical structures in species, just that when they are present, they are misrepresented in order to promote competitive narratives. This is why primatologist Frans de Waal inadvertently popularized the term ‘alpha male.’ Now, he’s debunking common stereotypes to explain what an ‘alpha male’ really is – empathetic and protective.

[–] owl@infosec.pub 2 points 2 days ago

Spoken like a real alpha 💪

[–] saddlebag@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

This really is the “No shit Sherlock” timeline