this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2025
196 points (98.5% liked)

politics

31196 readers
1683 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Senate and House versions of the Republican tax bill would reverse efforts to modernize the energy system and reduce greenhouse emissions.

Access options:

all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pezhore@infosec.pub 52 points 1 year ago (2 children)

“You cannot have this kind of whiplash,” Etheridge said. “If every four years tax policy changes drastically like this, we are not going to be able to build anything great in this country.”

No shit.if democrats ever get a trifecta again (highly unlikely) they'd better fucking pass actual laws rather than this budget bill crap.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That means actually having 60+ votes or ending the filibuster

[–] turdburglar@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

does it tho? tommy dumb fuck tuberville single handily shut down military appointments for months. moscow mitch just decided not to have senate hearings for garland.

the dems need to kick schumer in the balls and while he’s down get some fuken things took care of. they need to figure out how to out-moscow moscow mitch.

strongly worded letters can get fucked. we need some ‘well what the fuck are you gonna do about it?’

i used to call myself a dem but that’s just embarrassing now. not sure what i am anymore, you know, aside from pissed and frustrated.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

There are things they Democrats should have been doing in addition to what they've done, but they can't actually stop budget bills like this one unless four Republican Senators join them.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 38 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Is the goal to ensure the US falls behind the rest of the world?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yes — the racism and hate are more important to them.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Those are just tools for controlling the masses. The oligarchs want control and will burn this country down to keep it.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Also trump is a traitor and a tool of Putin who only cares about his money.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

And the sweet, sweet short-term cash for the right people.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

They do no believe the world is going to last, so their plan is to squeeze every bit of juice out of it as fast as possible before the End.

[–] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No...

The goal is to obscenely enrich to the fullest extent possible any/all Fossil Fuel Robber Barons and all their "friends" (read: the ones that initiated these policies).

They simply care for nothing else like climate change, the planet, people (rank and file), etc... (unless you count working to accelerate the Biblical End Times).

🤡 🖕 💩 💩

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago

To be fair, the US has been behind the rest of the world in most things for quite awhile.

What they want is total control and fear-based loyalty.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

These fucking species-traitors are trying to speedrun the end of human civilization, and they've convinced 40% of the country to cheer them on while they do it.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Their paymasters are very unsure about wanting humanity to survive:

Douthat: I think you would prefer the human race to endure, right?

Thiel: Uh ——

Douthat: You’re hesitating.

Thiel: Well, I don’t know. I would — I would ——

Douthat: This is a long hesitation!

Thiel: There’s so many questions implicit in this.

Douthat: Should the human race survive?

Thiel: Yes.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Thiel and that freak Curtis Yarvin are some very weird and fucked up people.

The Democrats need to bring back "weird" and in a very big way. That shit was working. Shine a spotlight on these weird motherfuckers and ask the normal American voter - do you really want this?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

It's about making "liberals" (meaning anyone even slightly to the left of Ronnie Raygun, I guess?) cry for the dumbdumbs that vote for the oligarchs to sell the country off.

For the stupid base and a lot of the elites that run the conservative "movement"/Republican Party, cruelty is the point. Making a shit-ton of money is the main point for the people getting the stupid base to vote against their own interests...even if they fuck over their own descendants...

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The plan is to reduce us to third world poverty. Use the collapse as an excuse for total austerity. Then, in ride the billionaires to the rescue, and most of us will serve them, just to stay alive.

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I will happily serve the billionaires.

With a side of coleslaw.

[–] D_C@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ewww, disgusting. Yucky coleslaw!! No thank yo...Wait, is it homemade or store bought?

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

German slaw with vinegar instead of mayonnaise.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They'll ride in, but it won't be to save us. It'll be only exactly to the extent they can buy up the bankrupt economy. It's the post-Soviet Russian collapse wealth privatisation scenario.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The Republicans not only hate freedom, hate this country and most of the people in it, hate the rule of law, and hate the Constitution, they also hate humanity.

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They hate not being the ones in control. That's it. Because they can't handle being afraid.

It's fear not hate.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

So many of them spend a lot of time and money on keeping the others in their group deeply afraid of their own shadow. So it's something caused by them. They aren't born that fearful, that kind of fear has to be curated.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Except for White Jeeeeezus!

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Subsidies for coal and taxes on solar

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Freedumb!

Do you smell that? Clean coal, son. Nothing else in the world smells like that. I love the smell of clean coal in the morning. Smells like victory!

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

MAGA was all the people we hated along the way.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The term "maga" has no real meaning or guiding principles.

It's conservative Newspeak and sounds like baby-talk, which I think is no accident.

And the only thing that seems to outline what "maga" means is if it is something that makes Taco happy. Everything else is secondary, even if conservatives have completely reversed themselves on policies they supposedly held dear prior to learning how Taco feels on a given matter. The cons pretended to revere the military at one point. If Taco says those that serve are "suckers and losers", well, then, what Taco says is law, and cons have always been at war with the military, I guess. Until Taco needs a birthday parade...

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well in case you didn’t notice, I was ridiculing MAGA because everything Trunp does is worshipped by millions just because he does it - even if it’s something incredibly stupid and and/or tragic like logging National parks just to “stick it to Canada”.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, sorry, I completely noticed. None of that commentary was meant as a poor reflection on you or what you said. I was just "yes-and'ing" your comment, I guess. :)

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I wonder what the percentage is that: believe the lies/value $ above everything VS just wanting to opposite everything Dems want and just don't care they are killing people/the planet?

Like what % are actually making backroom deals and JDGAF that the planet is burning, and which are just asshole dipshits that see it as just getting fake GOP points to fuck everything because it's "sticking it to the libs!".

Edit - Also the bigger issue is that once these assholes make it easier for Big Business to fill the air/land/water full of forever chemicals and micro-plastics and all the other fun shit, good luck getting back to "healthy". It's going to take decades and $$$$$ to even turn around let alone "fix".